Hi,
> On 9 Jun 2021, at 16:41, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
>
> Only mupdf-gl sees the signature annotation after signing it. Acrobat,
> Evince, Okular and xpdf cannot deal with the signature.
Just FYI:
On the Mac, I can sign the processed example using Adobe Acrobat Reader DC,
and it can save a
On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 16:41 +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 6/8/21 11:07 PM, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 17:41 +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Try to open a PDF document signed with mupdf-gl in Acrobat
> > > (Reader or
> > > not). You will see
On 6/9/21 12:28 PM, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 23:29 +0100, Adam Reviczky wrote:
>> Not sure how good it is, but in the poppler discussion this site was
>> mentioned to verify the signature details:
>> https://validator.docusign.com/
>
> Oh, that's a great tool,
On 6/8/21 11:07 PM, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 17:41 +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Try to open a PDF document signed with mupdf-gl in Acrobat (Reader or
>> not). You will see that the signature is wrong.
>
> Hm, I tested with Okular, Firefox and MasterPDF
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 23:29 +0100, Adam Reviczky wrote:
> Not sure how good it is, but in the poppler discussion this site was
> mentioned to verify the signature details:
> https://validator.docusign.com/
>
> I have tried using with poppler's pdfsig and Okular.
>
Oh, that's a great tool,
Not sure how good it is, but in the poppler discussion this site was
mentioned to verify the signature details: https://validator.docusign.com/
I have tried using with poppler's pdfsig and Okular.
Adam
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 10:14 PM Leonard Janis Robert König
wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08 at
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 17:41 +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 6/7/21 10:43 PM, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote:
> > Hi Adam, Hi Pablo,
> >
> > I just noticed your replies, sorry for the late answer!
> >
> > I could sign forms with both okular as well as mupdf just fine,
> > although the
On 6/7/21 10:43 PM, Leonard Janis Robert König wrote:
> Hi Adam, Hi Pablo,
>
> I just noticed your replies, sorry for the late answer!
>
> I could sign forms with both okular as well as mupdf just fine,
> although the behavior is different. The former assumes that the field
> is already an
Hi Adam, Hi Pablo,
I just noticed your replies, sorry for the late answer!
> On the viewers, I cannot recall exactly what I've done earlier in the
> year,
> but indeed, most likely I have tried evince after signing it from the
> command line. From
>
Hi Pablo,
First of all, my bad, the test suite example works just fine in Adobe,
including with ConTeXt latest.
I have messed up my form by overriding the PDF version to 2.0, shouldn't
have done that.
On the viewers, I cannot recall exactly what I've done earlier in the year,
but indeed, most
On 5/2/21 12:20 AM, Adam Reviczky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot get the signature working either, but almost certain it did
> work in February this year, as I have done some with MKIV.
> [...]
Hi Adam,
I’m on a Linux computer, so I’m not able to check this now.
If the signature isn’t working, you
Hi,
I cannot get the signature working either, but almost certain it did work
in February this year, as I have done some with MKIV.
>From the test suite:
fields-007.tex
\nopdfcompression
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\definefield[x][signature]
\field[x]
\stoptext
Using the
12 matches
Mail list logo
