Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 12.05.2009 um 19:07 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Only footnotes in section titles don't work - should they?
[...]
I couldn't construct a minimal failing example - any hints?
No solution but here is a test file:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
Am 12.05.2009 um 19:07 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Only footnotes in section titles don't work - should they?
[...]
I couldn't construct a minimal failing example - any hints?
No solution but here is a test file:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\section{foo\footnote{bar}}
Am 2009-05-10 um 18:44 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
But it doesn't work, it's always bytext, i.e. numbering runs
through from start to end.
And the marks still don't show up in the text!
(Latest minimals beta, 2009-05-10 18.30 MESZ)
I find this is fixed now (Beta 2009.05.12 17:37). Great,
Yanrui Li wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Yanrui Li wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:17:38 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still strugling with defaults (it's
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 23:17:38 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still strugling with
Am 2009-05-06 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi Hans,
so you're back from Bachotek and ready to attack the bugs? The beta
you uploaded today is still badly broken. Most of this has been
reported before; I just collect it here for your convenience :-)
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
On May 7, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-06 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi Hans,
so you're back from Bachotek and ready to attack the bugs? The beta
you uploaded today is still badly broken. Most of this has been
reported before; I just collect it here
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and ToC, but I guess that's
only in my setup; couldn't reproduce it in my minimal example.
BTW (1)
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
BTW (1) font problems:
I'm using TeX Gyre and some Type1 fonts with MkIV nearly without
problems; didn't need to copy any files like you.
looks like an engine problem; we'll look into it
-
Am 07.05.2009 um 10:31 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are probably
because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Wolfgang
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and ToC, but I guess that's
only in my setup; couldn't reproduce it in my
Am 2009-05-07 um 13:38 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are probably
because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Hä? Was soll das?
I don't want to \type some command, but just to
Am 2009-05-07 um 14:44 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and ToC, but I guess
that's
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 14:44 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-07 um 10:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Sorry Thomas, but you forgot one:
We'd be incredibly lucky if there's only one that I missed :-)
Well, ATM I've some problems with headers and
Am 07.05.2009 um 15:08 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Am 2009-05-07 um 13:38 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are
probably because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Use
Am 07.05.2009 um 15:51 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 15:27:35 Hans Hagen wrote:
when i mention beta, i mean the one on the website ... the minimals
lag
upto an hour behind
Please, I am confused: which one on which website?
http://www.pragma-ade.nl/download-1.htm
contains
On Thursday 07 May 2009 15:56:19 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 07.05.2009 um 15:51 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 15:27:35 Hans Hagen wrote:
when i mention beta, i mean the one on the website ... the minimals
lag
upto an hour behind
Please, I am confused: which one on
Am 2009-05-07 um 15:28 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
My minimal example shows some more problems, but these are
probably because \recurselevel isn't expanded at the right time...
\dorecurse{1000}{Use \type{\expanded{...}}\par}
Use \expanded{...}
Use \expanded{...}
...
Hä? Was soll das?
I
Am 07.05.2009 um 16:32 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Unfortunately it is critical, where to put \expanded, and I tend to
take always the wrong place...
Therefore the minimal example is fixed; header and toc handlings
seems right, as I presumed.
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2009-05-06 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi Hans,
so you're back from Bachotek and ready to attack the bugs? The beta
you uploaded today is still badly broken. Most of this has been
reported before; I just collect it here for your convenience :-)
Sorry
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from http://pragma-ade.nl/context/beta/cont-tmf.zip
Am I alone in seeing this?
i'm still strugling with defaults (it's not so much a matter of not
working but more of how to set
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Yanrui Li liyanrui...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I still get a major sectioning bug using the new beta mkiv
1. minimals from the garden
2. beta from
Am 06.05.2009 um 21:58 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
2. The new structure code doesn't expand xmlflushes in sections.
Here's an example:
\setuphead[section][expansion=yes]
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of
On May 6, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
2. The new structure code doesn't expand xmlflushes in sections.
Here's an example:
\setuphead[section][expansion=yes]
Wolfgang
Thank you, that works! This is new, right?
Thomas
Am 06.05.2009 um 22:25 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On May 6, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
2. The new structure code doesn't expand xmlflushes in sections.
Here's an example:
\setuphead[section][expansion=yes]
Thank you, that works! This is new, right?
Yes it is.
Another
27 matches
Mail list logo
