Hi,
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 09:29, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 07:02, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> >
> > host seems to be down.
>
> Thanks a lot for the notification.
>
> The machine isn't reachable over ssh either.
> I'll try to reach the people in the computing centre to take a look
Dear Vladimir,
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 07:02, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>
> According to page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone to install
> ConTeXt standalone (I assume MkIV) one has to download first-setup.sh script
> (Linux,Mac,*BSD) from contextgarden.net (minimals.contextgarden.net
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 13:56, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> Question for mojca: will the garden eventually move to your new context
> server?
That depends on the main maintainer. We have 2TB disk space. I cannot
speak about uptime yet, but the admins are sometimes willing to run to
institute at 3am when
On 18-12-2010 12:14, Daniel Grycman wrote:
It's not so much about doing regular server maintainance (which is
very low once the server is set up), but about implementing new
creative ideas. Improving application for modules, implement new
features on wiki, creating some safe environment to enab
> It's not so much about doing regular server maintainance (which is
> very low once the server is set up), but about implementing new
> creative ideas. Improving application for modules, implement new
> features on wiki, creating some safe environment to enable running
> mkiv on the server, maint
2010/12/18 Mojca Miklavec
> creating some safe environment to enable running
> mkiv on the server,
I'm actually working on this specifically. It will
Python/Django/PostgreSQL-based and it will (hopefully) be ready before
summer semester starts here, which is 1.3.2011. We will use it inside of a
On 12/18/2010 10:36 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I don't know what sourceforge supports and what it doesn't, but I
don't believe that I could get ssh access, consume 40 GB of disk
space, run arbitrary cronjobs and offer rsync access to start with
(all needed for minimals).
And on top of that all,
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:12, Vnpenguin wrote:
>
> Why not move all to Sourceforge.net ?
Apart from being ugly, sourceforge doesn't even come close to the
desired functionality of contextgarden.net. The garden is in
suboptimal state, but moving to sourceforge wouldn't simplify the
things in any s
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:26, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have mentioned it at the last context conference: I am looking for a person
> (or a group) to take over the server contextgarden.net. Not only the wiki or
> the modules section or ..., but the complete server.
>
> I have started
Hi Patrick,
hi list,
I would be interested but only as part of a group. Anyone else interested?
Daniel
Am 17.12.2010 um 11:26 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
> Hi,
>
> I have mentioned it at the last context conference: I am looking for a person
> (or a group) to take over the server contextgarden.
10 matches
Mail list logo