Hi all,
I'm resurrecting an old thread and top-posting... For details, see
the post below. The problem was that the content of itemizations
sometimes disappeared in xml processed by mkiv. I emphasize
sometimes: now you see it, now you don't... I can't really post a
minimal example
Am 14.07.2008 um 16:45 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi all,
I'm resurrecting an old thread and top-posting... For details, see
the post below. The problem was that the content of itemizations
sometimes disappeared in xml processed by mkiv. I emphasize
sometimes: now you see it, now you
On Jul 14, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you test the following definition for item a while:
\startxmlsetups xml:item
\startitem
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopitem
\stopxmlsetups
Regards,
Wolfgang
I have something very similar in my environment:
\startxmlsetups xml:item
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current
Hans
Thanks Hans! You're right; I worked on a minimal example for a long
time and got confused. I tried again; this example demonstrates the
behavior (I tested on two different computers
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current
Hans
Thanks Hans! You're right; I worked on a minimal example for a long
time and got confused. I tried
On Mar 25, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current
Hans
Thanks Hans! You're right; I worked on a minimal
Thomas A. Schmitz schrieb:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current
Hans
Thanks Hans! You're right;
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
your original example works here too. today's context and latest
luatex.
hth, peter
Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example I
posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled, because I
get something
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I played some more with the new mkiv xml mechanism and am beginning to
see the light: some things that turned out to be very difficult (at
least for me) with the old mechanism are easy now. However, I still
Thomas A. Schmitz schrieb:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
your original example works here too. today's context and latest
luatex.
hth, peter
Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example I
posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled,
On Mar 25, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example
I posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled,
because I get something like this
see yourself and beleave ;)
Hey, I'm quite willing to believe - but now I
Thomas A. Schmitz schrieb:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example
I posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled,
because I get something like this
see yourself and beleave ;)
i belIEve my
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
your original example works here too. today's context and latest
luatex.
hth, peter
Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example I
posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
I played some more with the new mkiv xml mechanism and am beginning to
see the light: some things that turned out to be very difficult (at
least for me) with the old mechanism are easy now. However, I still
have a couple of questions:
works here, just
14 matches
Mail list logo
