Re: [NTG-context] Nested modes and itemizations

2016-11-17 Thread Christoph Reller 
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 13:14:49 +0100 Hans Hagen  wrote:

>
> On 11/17/2016 11:21 AM, Christoph Reller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the following minimal not-working example:
> >
> > \starttext
> > \startitemize
> > \item One
> >   \startmode[modeA]
> >   \item Two
> > \startitemize
> >   \startmode[modeB] % <- this
> >   \item Two A   % <- does
> >   \stopmode % <- not work
> >   % \doifmode{modeB}{\item Two A} % <- this works
> > \item Two B
> > \stopitemize
> >   \stopmode
> > \stopitemize
> > \stoptext
> >
> > Note that both modeA and modeB are not defined and hence not enabled.
> > When compiled with the latest version of ConTeXt MkIV, I get: Missing
> > number, treated as zero.
> > However, If I use the inline version \doifmode instead of the
> > environment version \startmode \stopmode, then the example compiles
> > without problem.
> >
> > I am afraid but this may be a bug.
>
> No, just the way tex parses, \stopmode is a delimiter so the inner
> \stopmode ends the outer \startmode.
>
> Using the \doif variable doesn't have that problem.
>
>
Oh, of course! Thank you and sorry for the noise.
Christoph
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Nested modes and itemizations

2016-11-17 Thread Hans Hagen 

On 11/17/2016 11:21 AM, Christoph Reller wrote:

Hi,

I have the following minimal not-working example:

\starttext
\startitemize
\item One
  \startmode[modeA]
  \item Two
\startitemize
  \startmode[modeB] % <- this
  \item Two A   % <- does
  \stopmode % <- not work
  % \doifmode{modeB}{\item Two A} % <- this works
\item Two B
\stopitemize
  \stopmode
\stopitemize
\stoptext

Note that both modeA and modeB are not defined and hence not enabled.
When compiled with the latest version of ConTeXt MkIV, I get: Missing
number, treated as zero.
However, If I use the inline version \doifmode instead of the
environment version \startmode \stopmode, then the example compiles
without problem.

I am afraid but this may be a bug.


No, just the way tex parses, \stopmode is a delimiter so the inner 
\stopmode ends the outer \startmode.


Using the \doif variable doesn't have that problem.

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] nested modes

2009-09-16 Thread Hans Hagen 

Peter Münster wrote:

Hello,

Here is a problem with nested modes:

\starttext
no mode
\startmode[mode1]
  mode1a
  \startmode[mode2]
mode2
  \stopmode
  mode1b % this is printed, but it should not
\stopmode
no mode
\stoptext


indeed, will never work, when nested use \startlocalmode or \doifmodeelse

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___