Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 06.12.2013 um 21:04 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:

 \define[1]\ChapterListNumber
  {\simplealignedbox{\listparameter{width}}{flushright}{#1}}
 
 \setuplist[chapter][width=2em,distance=1em,numbercommand=\ChapterListNumber]
 
 This now gives a toc looking the way I like.
 May I lay at your foot a plea for a change/additional parameter here? 
 \setuplist[][itemalign=left/right] or something in that sense.
 For numbered chapters I consider an alignment as below most natural, although 
 opinions may differ.

When there would a key for this it should be named numberalign.

 By the way, the \define[1] eludes me. Why this particular [1] there?

You specify the number of argument for the \define command with the number, e.g.

\define\command{…} is equal to \unexpanded\def\command{…}

and

\define[3]\command{…} is equal to \unexpanded\def#1#2#3{…}


When you want to create a command which is similar to \def (without 
\unexpanded) you can use \defineexpandable[number]\command

 Why do you think lists use the itemgroup/itemize mechanism?
 
 I didn’t think that exactly, but just tried it in despair and having the idea 
 that toc items are set as an itemized list (it looks that way, isn’t it?).

No, they are unrelated but both mechanism use the same low level commands for 
the indentation of the text.

Wolfgang___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 06.12.2013 um 13:53 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:

 In the table of contents my items are numbers 1, 2, etc. At the number the 
 aligning is wrong, the tens are shifted to the right. I tried to remedy with 
 a setup:
 \setupitemgroup[itemize][each][5,autointro][…]
 But changing width, distance, textdistance, itemalign do not have effect on 
 the toc.
 How to accomplish?

Where is the problem, in your table of contents which is controlled by 
\setuplist or in your itemize which is controlled by \setupitemgroup?

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread H. van der Meer
The table of contents results from:

\startfrontmatter
\input front
\let\ChapterTOC\relax   % Only then chapters typeset !?
\completecontent
\stopfrontmatter

The table of contents is typeset from the completecontent, so I guess the 
answer to your question will be \setuplist.

There I have set

\setupcombinedlist[content][list=chapter]%  [list={chapter,section}]
\setupcombinedlist[section][list=section]

Why I have to use \let\ChapterTOC\relax is a riddle to me. I want the main toc 
giving the chapters, whereas in the seperate chapters the sections therin 
should appear in their own toc.

Hans van der Meer



On 6 dec. 2013, at 14:44, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 Am 06.12.2013 um 13:53 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:
 
 In the table of contents my items are numbers 1, 2, etc. At the number the 
 aligning is wrong, the tens are shifted to the right. I tried to remedy with 
 a setup:
 \setupitemgroup[itemize][each][5,autointro][…]
 But changing width, distance, textdistance, itemalign do not have effect on 
 the toc.
 How to accomplish?
 
 Where is the problem, in your table of contents which is controlled by 
 \setuplist or in your itemize which is controlled by \setupitemgroup?
 
 Wolfgang
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!
 
 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 06.12.2013 um 14:59 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:

 The table of contents results from:
 
 \startfrontmatter
   \input front
   \let\ChapterTOC\relax   % Only then chapters typeset !?
   \completecontent
 \stopfrontmatter
 
 The table of contents is typeset from the completecontent, so I guess the 
 answer to your question will be \setuplist.
 
 There I have set
 
 \setupcombinedlist[content][list=chapter]%[list={chapter,section}]
 \setupcombinedlist[section][list=section]
 
 Why I have to use \let\ChapterTOC\relax is a riddle to me. I want the main 
 toc giving the chapters, whereas in the seperate chapters the sections therin 
 should appear in their own toc.


Which numbers are wrong, the section numbers or the page numbers?

\starttext

\title{Table of contents}

\placecontent[list=chapter]

\dorecurse{20}
  {\chapter{Chapter #1}
   \placecontent % lists are local unless you use criterium=all
   \dorecurse{5}
 {\section{Section #1.##1}}}

\stoptext

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread H. van der Meer
Which numbers are wrong, the section numbers or the page numbers?The chapter numbers. See the jpg below. The 10 with its separator is too far to the right.
Hans van der Meer


On 6 dec. 2013, at 15:13, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:Am 06.12.2013 um 14:59 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:The table of contents results from:\startfrontmatter	\input front		\let\ChapterTOC\relax	% Only then chapters typeset !?		\completecontent\stopfrontmatterThe table of contents is typeset from the completecontent, so I guess the answer to your question will be \setuplist.There I have set\setupcombinedlist[content][list=chapter]%	[list={chapter,section}]\setupcombinedlist[section][list=section]Why I have to use \let\ChapterTOC\relax is a riddle to me. I want the main toc giving the chapters, whereas in the seperate chapters the sections therin should appear in their own toc.Which numbers are wrong, the section numbers or the page numbers?\starttext\title{Table of contents}\placecontent[list=chapter]\dorecurse{20} {\chapter{Chapter #1} \placecontent % lists are local unless you use criterium=all \dorecurse{5} {\section{Section #1.##1}}}\stoptextWolfgang___If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-contextwebpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.netarchive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/wiki : http://contextgarden.net__
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 06.12.2013 um 17:32 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:

 
 Which numbers are wrong, the section numbers or the page numbers?
 
 The chapter numbers. See the jpg below. The 10 with its separator  is too far 
 to the right.

This is normal because the numbers are aligned on the left margin, when the 
space for the number
is too narrow you have to increase the width value, e.g. 
\setuplist[chapter][width=3em].

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread H. van der Meer
Indeed, \setuplist[chapter][width=3em] makes the chapternumber set in a wider 
field.

But the alignment is as bad as it was: flushleft, i.e. the 1 of chapter 10 
still aligns with the units from the lower chapters instead of aligning to the 
zero.

I looked up \setuplist in the command catalogue but cannot find a parameter to 
align this number, either to the right or to the left. It just seems to stick 
with the builtin default.

I tried something like \setupitemgroup[chapter][][][itemalign=left (also tried 
right)] but to no avail.

 Hans van der Meer



On 6 dec. 2013, at 17:41, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 Am 06.12.2013 um 17:32 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:
 
 
 Which numbers are wrong, the section numbers or the page numbers?
 
 The chapter numbers. See the jpg below. The 10 with its separator  is too 
 far to the right.
 
 This is normal because the numbers are aligned on the left margin, when the 
 space for the number
 is too narrow you have to increase the width value, e.g. 
 \setuplist[chapter][width=3em].
 
 Wolfgang
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!
 
 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 06.12.2013 um 20:20 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:

 Indeed, \setuplist[chapter][width=3em] makes the chapternumber set in a wider 
 field.
 
 But the alignment is as bad as it was: flushleft, i.e. the 1 of chapter 10 
 still aligns with the units from the lower chapters instead of aligning to 
 the zero.
 
 I looked up \setuplist in the command catalogue but cannot find a parameter 
 to align this number, either to the right or to the left. It just seems to 
 stick with the builtin default.

\define[1]\ChapterListNumber
  {\simplealignedbox{\listparameter{width}}{flushright}{#1}}

\setuplist[chapter][width=2em,distance=1em,numbercommand=\ChapterListNumber]

\starttext

\title{Table of contents}

\placecontent

\dorecurse{20}{\chapter{Chapter #1}}

\stoptext

 I tried something like \setupitemgroup[chapter][][][itemalign=left (also 
 tried right)] but to no avail.

Why do you think lists use the itemgroup/itemize mechanism?

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] wider item numbering in toc

2013-12-06 Thread H. van der Meer
 \define[1]\ChapterListNumber
  {\simplealignedbox{\listparameter{width}}{flushright}{#1}}
 
 \setuplist[chapter][width=2em,distance=1em,numbercommand=\ChapterListNumber]

This now gives a toc looking the way I like.
May I lay at your foot a plea for a change/additional parameter here? 
\setuplist[][itemalign=left/right] or something in that sense.
For numbered chapters I consider an alignment as below most natural, although 
opinions may differ.
 8
 9
10
11
instead of
8
9
10
11

By the way, the \define[1] eludes me. Why this particular [1] there?

 Why do you think lists use the itemgroup/itemize mechanism?

I didn’t think that exactly, but just tried it in despair and having the idea 
that toc items are set as an itemized list (it looks that way, isn’t it?).

Hans van der Meer



On 6 dec. 2013, at 20:36, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 Am 06.12.2013 um 20:20 schrieb H. van der Meer h.vanderm...@uva.nl:
 
 Indeed, \setuplist[chapter][width=3em] makes the chapternumber set in a 
 wider field.
 
 But the alignment is as bad as it was: flushleft, i.e. the 1 of chapter 10 
 still aligns with the units from the lower chapters instead of aligning to 
 the zero.
 
 I looked up \setuplist in the command catalogue but cannot find a parameter 
 to align this number, either to the right or to the left. It just seems to 
 stick with the builtin default.
 
 \define[1]\ChapterListNumber
  {\simplealignedbox{\listparameter{width}}{flushright}{#1}}
 
 \setuplist[chapter][width=2em,distance=1em,numbercommand=\ChapterListNumber]
 
 \starttext
 
 \title{Table of contents}
 
 \placecontent
 
 \dorecurse{20}{\chapter{Chapter #1}}
 
 \stoptext
 
 I tried something like \setupitemgroup[chapter][][][itemalign=left (also 
 tried right)] but to no avail.
 Wolfgang
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___