[Ntop-misc] Link aggregation and several nProbe instances as consumers

ed interfaces no flow log trace is shown and of course, no netflow packet emitted. Am I missing something? Best regards, Manuel Polonio ___ Ntop-misc mailing list Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Re: [Ntop-misc] Link aggregation and several nProbe instances as consumers

flow packets exported (Ok, on my test I'm writing flows to disk, but it's the same for udp exported packets). Maybe my problem could be related to my nProbe license. I don't know how to check if my nProbe license has PF_Ring support. Best regards, Manuel Polonio 2015

Re: [Ntop-misc] pf_ring and ixgbe error with hugepages

Please José, check this url: https://svn.ntop.org/svn/ntop/trunk/PF_RING/README.hugepages Best regards, Manuel Polonio 2015-02-25 14:41 GMT+01:00 Jose Vila : > Hello, > > I'm testing pf_ring with a new intel x520 network card. > > I just installed PF_RING 6.0.3 ($Revision:

Re: [Ntop-misc] Link aggregation and several nProbe instances as consumers

code version running. 2015-02-19 11:11 GMT+01:00 Manuel Polonio : > Thank you Alfredo. That's what I thought. > > Let me explain why I don't think my nprobe (compiled with pfring support) > is not working as expected. > My test is: > sudo ~/PF_RING/userland/examples/pfdna

Re: [Ntop-misc] NTOPNG NPROBE Packet Filtering

Hi Dan, I think your problem is that the BPF filter should be configured on the exporter (nProbe) and not on the collector (ntop). Hope it helps, Manuel Polonio 2015-06-24 23:28 GMT+02:00 Carlton, Dan : > Hi… > > > > I am using NTOPNG (2.0.150624) with NPROBE (7.1.150624) {PF

[Ntop-misc] nDPI master branch merging policy

Hi Luca, do you have any (time based, versioning...) criteria to update master branch? Dev branch is commonly commited to. Do you have any suggestion about which branch to use with nProbe? Thanks in advance and best regards, Manuel Polonio ___ Ntop

[Ntop-misc] Packages web repository: out of service

Hi, ntop packages web repository seems to be out of service this morning: http://www.nmon.net/packages Best regards, Manuel Polonio ___ Ntop-misc mailing list Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

[Ntop-misc] Using Java/Scala apps with PF_Ring

protocol stacks and I think that it would be an unbridgeable drawback. Any reference, suggestion or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance and best regards, Manuel Polonio ___ Ntop-misc mailing list Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it http://

[Ntop-misc] PF_Ring .gitignore file

Hi guys, attached you may find a .gitignore file for PF_Ring project. I found a little annoying having hundreds of untracked files everytime I run a make command on the project. It would be great if Alfredo would add it to the repo, but this is a preliminary version reforged from the one I use on

Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_Ring .gitignore file

00 Alfredo Cardigliano : > Hi Manuel > thank you, the only thing I am concerned is about keeping updated manually > this file over time. > > Alfredo > > > On 22 Oct 2015, at 10:28, Manuel Polonio > wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > attached you may find a .gi

Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_Ring .gitignore file

Ok, I'll check how to do a pull request and send it to your repo asap. Best regards, Manuel Polonio 2015-10-25 21:02 GMT+01:00 Alfredo Cardigliano : > Hi Manuel > ok, please send a pull request. > > Thank you > Alfredo > > On 25 Oct 2015, at 18:08, Manuel Poloni

Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_Ring: pfsend much more slower

using ZC, did you prepend the "zc:” > suffix to the interface name? > > Alfredo > > > On 29 Oct 2015, at 08:04, Manuel Polonio Torrellas < > manuel.polo...@bitmonlab.com> wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > previously (PF_Ring 5.6.1 version), I was

[Ntop-misc] zsend options

't include this option. Is there any technical constraint that avoid this feature to be implemented on ZC or may I file a request for this feature to be added? Thanks in advance and best regards, Manuel Polonio PS: By the way Alfredo, on the second test environment I get a decent 7Gbps (4 core

Re: [Ntop-misc] zbalance_ipc Hash Mode 4 Sending Packets to Multiple Apps

Hi Jim, I faced a similar problem with the same NIC some time ago. I found the same upper bound in a 32 physical-core (64 cores with HT) server. The point is that this server had two different CPUs (with 16 physical cores (32 cores with HT) each one) and, maybe I'm wrong, but I seem to remember th

[Ntop-misc] PF_Ring: pfsend much more slower

poor performance, and let you know my results and conclusions. Thanks in advance and best regards, Manuel Polonio ___ Ntop-misc mailing list Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc