Does anyone know what the criteria is for the duplicate file reports in FSRM?
Is it a hash of the file? I'm trying to confirm that it's not just a filename
match.
Matthew Topper
At least they didn't make it an even $500 - that would just be too darn
expensive!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:44 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: DPM
Hi,
I have downloaded below software's to test functionality/features. Any
pros/cons you would like to share.
è Global Escape EFT Enterprise
è JScape MFT
è Solarwinds Serv-U
è Cornerstone MFT
è IPSwitch MOVEit
Regards,
Dhiraj
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
We have used Global EFT
Pretty easy to use. Tech support is pretty responsive on the few issues we
had. Can be configured to automatically block IPs that are trying to get in
after so many attempts. Log files show which accounts they're attempting to
use. You have the choice of password,
Appreciate the feedback, Paul.
Dhiraj
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul
Sent: 03 December 2014 18:55
To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Managed File Transfer Solution Recommendations
We have
We have been using GlobalScape EFT for about 8 years.
They have been able to answer all of our requests.
And they have passed all of our auditors. NCUA, Indiana State DFI, PCI, GBLA,
etc.
And they are secure and fairly cheap.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
I'm going around in circles trying to make a decision on a new Firewall and Web
filtering appliance.
We currently have the SonicWall NSA240 * 2 for HA and iPrism for Webfiltering.
We have increased our speed on Rogers fibre to 200 / 200 Mbs, the SonicWall is
only 100 Mbs. Also the iPrism can't
I can't say enough about how awesome our Barracuda is overall. The bad reviews
you see may reflect the pre 8.x version released this summer, it was a dramatic
change for that product.
Pro's
1) It's list of 'unknowns' is very manageable so you can block unknowns.
Blocking unknowns is HUGE
Cisco - I don't have first hand knowledge.Sonicwall - I've only played with
their little routers, which have basic filtering. I have not played with their
web filtering appliance.Barracuda - We use a Barracuda 610 Web Filter. It does
the two things we require of a web filter: Block content and
ROFL
From: pmaglin...@scvl.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] RE: DPM weirdness.
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:58:40 +
At least they didn’t make it an even $500 – that would just be too darn
expensive!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
We use the SonicWall NSA3600 and Barracuda Web Filter. (We used to use the
SonicWall web filtering but needed more granularity.) Both work well for
us. We have 2 K-8 schools and central office going through the Sonicwall
and Barracuda. The Barracuda is easy to manage and interfaces well with
I never required the higher end models , but have used their 2000's serires
models for about 10 years now
if you add their switch you can have 50 WAN ports (might be overkill)
http://www.draytek.us/
http://www.draytek.us/vigor-3900
From: sj...@amico.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Palo Alto. Can be expensive. When I last purchased though, it was cheaper
to buy the PA, than to replace our outdated ASAs with new versions and
renew our Websense subscription. You have to let the sales folks know you
are looking at competitive products.
It is my opinion that the PA platform
I like the PA technology, but I'm still disgruntled about the PA pricing
(and initial configuration complexity) for all but larger enterprises...
*ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker
*Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information Security) for
the
Sophos is okay, but for the money, I prefer the Fortinet devices in terms
of performance and management.
I've done lots of migrations FROM Cisco to various other products, so...
Those are the ones I can speak to from the perspective or recent experience.
Regards,
*ASB
Well Sophos is tossing in a second SG 330 for free until the end of the year
to sweeten the deal.
__
Stefan Jafs
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Andrew S. Baker
Sent: December 3, 2014 13:36
To: ntsysadm
PA is (or was) willing to negotiate if you buy direct. As soon as they
knew they could take business away from Cisco, they got very aggressive.
Like I say, replacing 2 ASA's with 2 PA's ended up being cheaper. This was
about 2 years ago.
Another trick is to get an eval unit. Then you can get a
I'm using Fortinet (smaller bandwidth, fewer people). But it has been good to
me. Works good. Support has been good, when I needed it (very seldom). Filter
works well for us also.
Mark
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stefan Jafs
Sent:
Not long ago there was a discussion about best practices for running your
DCs as VMs. Besides making sure that your PDC emulator is set to sync time
with a reliable outside time server, as you should do with a physical
server, *be sure the VM hosts have their time sync in order because VMs at
Search the vmware kb for Timekeeping, there are specific guidelines to follow.
I've not encountered an issue ever using these, how does your env compare to
their best practises?
jlc
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on
Heh. I rarely comment anything about VMWare (not my area of expertise), but I
did get into a slight kerfluffle with them in 2010 that led to them changing
their recommendations on this topic (there was quite a bit of behind the
scenes discussion that happened). See:
More importantly, that’s a very good article that you wrote.
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Michael B. Smith
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 3, 2014 4:26 PM
*To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Time Sync on
In this article, they only mention syncing with the domain hierarchy in
passing. It’s not mentioned as a best practice:
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=1318
So no we aren’t following their guidance and I see no reason to not use AD,
I have setup an ASA without a lot of Cisco background (training) and got it
pretty much correct. The only issue I had was a loop back for access to the
DMZ for a server we had out there from inside. If you have a syslog server you
can capture the logs but they can get messy and long. Once we
I was under the impression that the ‘correct’ way to do this was to have NTP
configured on your VMware or Hyper-V hosts (to sync with whatever external NTP
servers you want to pull from) and let them be authoritative in that your
virtual DC allows its clock to match the hardware, then operate
Thank you. ☺
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Charles F Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 5:27 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Time Sync on Virtual DCs
More importantly, that’s a very good article that
Please read my referenced article and the linked documents, including those
from both VMware and Microsoft.
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2010/01/29/a-brief-history-of-time-ok-ok-let-s-go-with-quot-an-introduction-to-the-windows-time-service-quot.aspx
From:
Please keep in mind that you can always request an escalation. You may not
always GET one, but you can request it.
You can also always request that you be assigned to someone who can better
speak your language. Those are always supposed to be honored.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
So it seems I’ve been doing this wrong. From reading those, it appears the
suggestion is to disable time sync in VMWare tools and let DCs query an NTP
server directly (and let members query the DC as normal)
I had been using the suggestions in this post for time sync with Hyper-V, but
I’m
That suggestion is, indeed, outdated.
It was true with early versions of Microsoft hypervisors (and early versions of
VMware hypervisors and Xen hypervisors, blah blah blah) --- but not today.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Matthew
We're currently using ASAs and Websense. Being forced to migrate to Palo Alto
within the next 6 months or so.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stefan Jafs
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:52 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
http://thycotic.com/products/secret-server/express/secret-server-express/
$10.00/year
Buy Secret Server Express now and get more users and Secrets.
Express purchases made by December 17th, 2014 are guaranteed 100 users
and 1,000 Secrets for the initial purchase and renewals.
PA pricing is an obstacle, especially the way they break out every service
- web filtering, AV/malware detection, etc - which really starts to add up.
Configuration is confusing until you get used to it, but I think it's less
complicated/cumbersome than the SonicWalls I've dealt with (which
33 matches
Mail list logo
