I prefer FSLogix as the tool, security wise, but I have had issues in the past
occasionally where I have been forced down the Browsium route. To be fair
browsium does a lot more - think compatibility for sites that need old IE
versions and the like.
Feel free to hit me up off list for more
We're having issues with our testing of FSLogix, so I was asked to get the
names of any others. Browsium was the one I was thinking of.
Thanks, James
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of James Rankin
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 7:57
It's typical to have two or more Lync/Skype servers...an Edge server on the
perimeter for external access and another internally for the backend. In
fact for external access an Edge server is required.
It's not typical to have two versions for an extended period. You'd expect
to see all the
It is typical that there would be two servers.
It is not typical that one would be Lync and the other would be SfB.
Sorry that the above wasn't clear.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 4:41 PM
To:
Thx for the feedback , im a bit confused though, in one response you said
its.typical (edge for external comms and one.for.internal) , on the other
hand.you said it could have been a stalled or broken config.
And there is no one to ask because they just hired a new "director of IT"
who
If you want external connectivity you need an edge server. It handles
connections outside the enterprise.
Internal connectivity is handled by a second server.
So yes, two servers is a typical installation (and with Lync 2010 and before,
you also had a third server - a mediation server).
There are number of configurations where this could be possible (Lync on the
Edge, SfB on the backend, for example), but none of them are ideal and would
generally indicate that a migration got stalled or broken in the middle.
I would ask that question. Doing a DR on a broken config is
I wouldn't think so, but if they are heavy phone users, etc., that might be
reasonable. We don't really do that so I can't say for sure.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
those who understand binary and those who don't.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
FSLogix and Browsium are the two I am aware of.
FSLogix can actually completely hide the old Java version from exploitation -
Browsium just hides it from the browser.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: 01
You could also use something like Citrix Secure Browser or even the likes of
Numecent Cloudpaging to achieve this, but it would rely on specific shortcuts
for the "older version" sites - FSLogix and Browsium can intercept and redirect
links and other entry points too.
From:
It's been quite a while, but there was a discussion about tools that can be
used to tell specific applications/websites, etc. to use a specific version of
Java, while everything else would use the latest version. One of the companies
doing this is FSLogix, but I need to find the other
Hmmm, I've done some executable generation in C# before, might have some
mileage.
I've managed with Stephen's idea so far (quick and easy!), but as I try to push
this into SCCM I might have to try something different.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
ok, will do
but why would something as small as 50 users require both a Lync and Skype,
they are both VM's and each has the following
200GB disc20 GB ram4 V-CPU
Is it that resource intensive that for 50 users it requires 2 servers?
From: melvin.bac...@byers.com
To:
Does it have to be a script?
You can trivially generate an executable in C# with a manifest to require
elevation, given you are using PowerShell you can certainly replicate the
functionality in C#...
jlc
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf
Confirm the versions installed on each. 2010 still says Lync. 2013 now gets
identified as Skype for Business. They are in fact one and the same product.
It's creating an unimaginable amount of confusion for us right now as we have
one of our clients who is moving to Lync / Skype for Business
Hi all,
First off excuse the cross-post , but I wasn't sure if it should be the
Exchange or NT list;
To start forgive my ignorance here, but the last time I setup an MS
communication server it was just that , 2005 Live communication server, which
brings me to my question;
I'm doing a DR plan
16 matches
Mail list logo
