On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:13 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote:
So I have to take ownership and is not a problem.
As the numbers of files and folders are a lot is there a way to enumerate
them in a way I dont have to visit them one by one ?
There's a checkbox at the bottom of the Owner tab
Thank you bat I can't do that
I have to put permissions not inherited by the main folder ,just by some
sub-folders, so my need is to enumerate them and visit them
GuidoElia
HELPPC
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 8.44
I just record who was in a group (net group command), remove all the users
from it, mark it as DEPRECATED in the description, and wait.
If anyone calls up complaining, it was still in use - roll back. If a few
weeks / months / years (delete as necessary for your environment) pass
without issue,
Why would you consider the smallest ASA 5505 as overkill compared to the
SonicWall ?
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
-Original Message-
From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3
machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet
via an ADSL router, and ping hosts on the internet via hostname and IP
address. However they are unable to browse web pages using any browser.
Sorry for the time warp, didn't notice the OP date before responding
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19,
Have you checked the hosts file in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc?
On 19 August 2010 10:29, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.org wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can help please? I have an issue on a clients XP SP3
machine in that they are able to successfully connect to the internet
Oh yes, sorry I forgot to mention that I'd checked this and it only had
the loopback address listed which seemed fine. I could always lift a
copy from another XP machine and copy it over the top I guess just to be
sure...
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 19 August 2010
Are you sure the problem isn't with the router? (probably unlikely, but you
never know)
Cheers
Ken
From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org]
Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Port 80 blocked?
Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can help please? I
Yep, I have other machines connected to the same router than can browse the web
no problems...
From: Ken Schaefer
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Aug 19 10:55:05 2010
Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked?
Are you sure the problem isn’t with the router?
Excuse the IIS-noob question, one of our developers just asked me if there
was any way to determine how many users are connected to our external
website at any given time. It runs IIS7 on Windows Server 2008. Do any of
the MS tools or logs allow you to view this, or would I need some sort of
For a very basic and free solution you could use netstat.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:19 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Excuse the IIS-noob question, one of our developers just asked me if there
was any way to determine how many users are connected to our external
website at any
Not saying this is the easiest or most accurate but perfmon will give you
current connections. If you are wanting live just start perfmon on the server
and I think it is under the webservice current connections. I use it on
occasion for special events.
From:
Does 'any browser' include non-installed browsers such as those from
Portable Apps?
http://portableapps.com/apps
http://portableapps.com/apps
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.orgwrote:
Yep, I have other machines connected to the same router than can browse the
Thanks guys
The developer in question seems happy to pick the bones out of perfmon and
netstat
Cheers!
On 19 August 2010 11:20, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.us wrote:
Not saying this is the easiest or most accurate but perfmon will give you
current connections. If you are wanting
Did you try to create another account on the fly ?
Da: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 11.55
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Port 80 blocked?
Are you sure the problem isn't with the router? (probably unlikely, but
A user account? Yes I created a admin account but this account still
had the issue...
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: 19 August 2010 11:41
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Port 80 blocked?
Did you try to create another account on the fly ?
Errr, no! When I said 'any browser', I actually meant three! The full
versions IE 7, IE8, Google Chrome and Firefox...
I will try one of these portable apps though, thanks for the tip.
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 August 2010 11:25
To: NT System Admin Issues
Then use ICACLS, or FILEACL or SUBINACL or
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote:
Yeah, I thought maybe you had multiple nics in a team/trunk from the vm's
vswitch to the physical switch.
Sorry, no idea:(
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 7:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The
Isn't a problem with how to do it
I need a GUI software that shows me where subfolders with unknown owner are, in
a formatted way all at once !
Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Inviato: gio 19/08/2010 13.03
A: NT System Admin Issues
If it was me, and I had a couple of ESX hosts, I would VMotion everything off
one, run update manager to remediate the patch level, and then move everything
the other way and do it to my other hosts.
I always take a screenshot first so I can put everything back the way it was.
I can honestly say
Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see
which one breaks DNS?
That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:53 AM
To: NT System
well, then try changing the IP address of your problem system to that of a
known properly working system and see if there is an IP block in place
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Mark Robinson mark.robin...@cips.orgwrote:
Yep, I have other machines connected to the same router than can browse
And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks.
On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see
which one breaks DNS?
That might give you (and us) a clue on what to drill down on
Cheers
Ken
YES!
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The arrrgghhhness of it all...
And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks.
On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer
Hmm. have you done a malware scan with something like Vipre Rescue and/or
Malware Bytes and/or SpyBot SD? I've seen something similar happen when a
machine was infested with Malware.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010
Hey Folks,
Anyone on this list (or know anyone) that has performed GroupWise -- Exchange
migrations? We are considering moving to Exchange. GroupWise is a fine
product but Exchange has direct integration with Great Plains and a our
soon-to-be-new electronic medical records system.
I've
Snapshots rule. Unless (like I've had) you get some idiot using them to do a
restore on a virtualised DC, in which case you may hear a lot of *NO*
On 19 August 2010 13:41, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote:
YES!
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Link
I have used 'HiJackThis' and also a lesser known spyware scanner and
resolved all issues / deleted all bugs that were raised by these
programs. I will download Vipre Rescue, thanks for the advice.
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: 19 August 2010 13:45
To: NT
Another option is CurrPorts ( www.nirsoft.net ). Nice free utility.
--
Bob Hartung
Wisco Industries, Inc.
736 Janesville St.
Oregon, WI 53575
Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215
Fax: (608) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
_
From: James Rankin
Wow McCrap on a chip. 7.68B? Their worth that much? Surprise is not the
word.
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Here is a surprise...
I'm guessing that the bigger surprise is still to come. Ask yourself this -
what would a chip company need with security software?
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
If you want to GUI, then get SecurityExplorer.
http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/security-explorer/
However, it is easy enough to get this via the CLI:
*subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner*
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for
Yow!!!
Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about:
-- That Intel feels it needs integrated security solutions
-- That it feels that McCrappy was the best organization to purchase to get
that capability
-- That we might have integrated McCrappy on our systems whether
AMD to get Symantec Endpoint Protection integrated on their chips next then.
Imagine the speed of those babies.
On 19 August 2010 14:16, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Yow!!!
Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about:
-- That Intel feels it needs
Maybe putting them on firmware is the only way to make them fast. LOL
Of course, the die size will be massive.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install
On
On that last one, does that mean AMD will acquire Symantec? Or, perhaps,
AVG? :)
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Yow!!!
Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about:
-- That Intel feels it needs integrated security
Mr. Alex E.,
If you're lurking, I'd love to hear\read what you think
Shook
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Yow!!!
Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not
Just what my Intel stock needed.
John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Here is a
You're welcome. Not saying that's the problem, but I've seen that sort of
problem cause the symptoms you're describing.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Port 80
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20014082-92.html?tag=nl.e498
Surprising indeed.
Intel got into and out of that business at least once before.
Symantec's corporate anti-virus product used to be Intel LANDesk Virus
Intel owning a security product is NOT a new concept ... remember Intel
LanDesk and LanProtect Antivirus ?
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Yow!!!
Now that is a huge surprise. I'm not sure what to be more scared about:
-- That Intel feels it needs
Hi Folks,
Just wondering if anyone here uses Extreme Kit?
If so what do you use for loop detection.
We have EAPS setup and EAPS does not work with STP
Any thoughts?
Regards
Fergal O'Connell
ICT Support
Cúram Software
Emailto: foconn...@curamsoftware.commailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com
The
It's more important now than it was then. Look for this to impact mobile
devices more than desktops/laptops.
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Intel owning a
This is what I was looking for,although the have a very curious way of licensing
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 15.14
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: Re: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
If you want
Remember that they left that market?!?
I'm not saying that Intel has no business with security. I'm saying that
swallowing a $7.7B pig to get back into that game is surprising.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Google is your friend.
For what seems very much like one-time use, the CLI is far more
cost-effective. But hey...
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install
Is there any better way to export Group Policy Objects rather than just
using the Back Up function? I am moving jobs and want to take copies of some
of the more useful and/or complex GPOs I've come up with while I've been
here (yes, I do have my boss's blessing for this). The Back Up function just
Also time is money!
If I have (what I made really now) to read all options of the command, to type
and retype for unwanted wrong input(you know , keyboards) and having an output
file practically unreadable because lines too long
Thank you and kind regards
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
H. Maybe that explains the McCrappy customer service we've been
getting from them.
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Here is a surprise...
Have you tried exporting it to CSV and manipulating in excel?
IE. subinacl /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner /file abc.csv
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: R: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
I trust Kurt's good sense to not try a snapshot restore on a DC.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:46 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Snapshots rule. Unless (like I've had) you get some idiot using them to do
a restore on a virtualised DC, in which case you may hear a lot of *NO
*
/file reports error .Why?
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 16.34
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Enumerate sub-folders with wrong permissions
Have you tried exporting it to CSV and
So.. Intel going to put McCrappy AV on their chips? Guess I will be looking
at AMD now.
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Wow McCrap on a chip. 7.68B?
What do you mean by complex? Have you developed a lot of adm templates to
perform different functions? You could just take those. In the GPMC, when
viewing the settings for each policy, you can 'show all' and right-click
/ Save Report to html file.
- Sean
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, James
LOL, U have stock? Fear... Tech is ebil these days...
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010
Tom,
We're in the planning stage of migrating from Groupwise 7.0 to Exchange 2010
right now. We have around 2800 users, at least 1200 of which are not connected
to the network on a regular basis. We're looking at Quest tools and Messaging
Architects tools to do the migration to an archive
Well, my Apple stock has done quite nicely-I definitely have no complaints
there. :)
Intel, though, is another story. But I do continue to have confidence in their
future, so I've held my shares.
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:32 AM
To:
Thanks Joe. At some point I may contact you off-list.
I don't really mind doing the migration, I'd just prefer not too. Mail is so
political. I am finishing a migration from Netware/eDirectory to
Windows/Active Directory. Users could care less as long as they can get their
files. Mail
Heh... EVERYTHING is easier in a controlled, classroom environment. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A bit OT: e-mail migration
Tom,
We're in the planning stage of
Really? We are implementing a mobile device AV/malware product (at great
expense), but what's the real threat landscape? Enterprise products (WinMo,
Blackberry) already include the ability to lock down what can run on the
device. Unless Intel is planning to hawk a product to SOHO markets (which
I've quickly implemented a GPO to hide the icon again, but I'm slightly
concerned that a user with standard privileges could initiate an installation,
and a restart, to boot.
That's a pet peeve of mine, but there is a more secure solution than yours,
sorry I don't
have the time to find the
Consider that Intel could hawk to the wireless providers or phone
manufacturers, or both.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Really? We are implementing a mobile device AV/malware product (at great
expense), but what’s the real threat landscape?
Everything is about a mobile device play these days.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel to buy McAfee for $7.68 billion
Consider that Intel could hawk to the wireless providers or
Because that's not the right parameter to use.
Try:
*subinacl /outputlog=C:\Output.LOG /subdirectories C:\Temp\ /display=owner
*
Assuming, of course, that all these folders exist.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Which version of Windows?
I have scripts for backing up GPOs in 2003. I haven't tested under 2008,
but I suspect they won't work there.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Signature powered by WiseStamp
There are some little gotchas with DAG administration, most of which will be
addressed in SP1 (I say most because I'm sure I don't know all of them - but
those I've run into are scheduled to be fixed).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
If I had vmotion, I would do exactly that.
I don't believe I'm updating drivers - none of the optional updates
are for hardware.
Kurt
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:26, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote:
If it was me, and I had a couple of ESX hosts, I would VMotion everything off
Excellent idea.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:21, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
And use snapshots to revert back when it breaks.
On Thursday, August 19, 2010, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Try installing the second set of patches one (or a few) at a time, and see
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote:
type and retype for unwanted wrong input
Suggestion: Put your stuff in batch files, so if you do need to type
something, you only have to type it once.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the
dreaded cursor corruption with dual monitors bug. That has been around for
about 10 releases now.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:46 PM
To: NT System Admin
Thank you. It works but, as I told you, for big folders with a lot of
subfolders and files ,you have to read line by line . I need something that you
can see at a glance like Windirstat
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Inviato: giovedì 19
Hmm... have dual mons and no cursor issues... but using the Win7 drivers
for the moment.
-sc
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: admin_m...@ultratech-llc.com
Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on
Where did you get thoseI don't need fancy graphics on a work box. Generic
would be awesome. This cursor is killing me.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Good suggestion , but with all the things to batch is a hard job (and
eventually many of them used once only)
GuidoElia
HELPPC
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 18.54
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: Re: Enumerate
If you have GPMC installed on 2003 server, there should be some scripts
available that might help-I think it's \program files\GPMC\Scripts. If you're
on 2008 or higher, the old 2003 GPMC scripts were not included, but can be
downloaded separately.
What gotchas are those Michael?
Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com 8/19/2010 9:45 AM
There are some little gotchas with DAG administration, most of which will be
addressed in SP1 (I say most because I'm sure I don't know all of them - but
those I've run into are scheduled to be fixed).
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:02 PM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote:
(and eventually many of them used once only)
If you use them only once, it still makes it easier to prep the
command line. And two years from now when you need to do almost the
same thing again, you can go back and change one thing
What do you mean by cursor corruption? I'm running dual monitors on a Radeon
X1300/X1550, using the drivers that Win7 installed when I built the box.
Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 9:54 AM
Put them in mine yesterday no problems but it is a 4550 on x64. Still have the
MS's. The default ones detected, and the next Windows Update grabbed
another set from MS...
-sc
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Where did you get
Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to
the other the mouse inflates itself into this giant pixelated 'thing'. Usually
have that crappy mouse on one monitor and the regular mouse on the other. Only
current workaround is to leave magnification turned on and
15 DNS Domain Name
Should it be just domain or domain.local?
Or does it not matter?
My win clients don't have any issues but I have a terminal client that
can ping it's management server by the FQDN but not by machine name
alone. And of course it won't work unless it can find it's management
Have you tried going into the WIN display control panel, Troubleshooting,
and playing with hardware accelaration?
--
Richard D. McClary
Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group
ASPCA®
1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36
Urbana, IL 61802
richardmccl...@aspca.org
P: 217-337-9761
C:
weird. I've never had that happen to me, and I use both monitors extensively.
I am using Win7 32 bit though, so maybe that's why.
Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:13 AM
Hits dual monitor users. Random but frequent...as you move from one monitor to
the other the mouse
Yep, it is a 64 bit only thing.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
weird. I've never had that happen to me, and I use both monitors
Oh yea, every checkbox, slider and mouse option has been tested.
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Have you tried going into the WIN display control
Option 15 in DHCP should be domain.local
GuidoElia
HELPPC
-Messaggio originale-
Da: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Inviato: giovedì 19 agosto 2010 19.15
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: DHCP Scope Option
15 DNS Domain Name
Should it be just domain or domain.local?
Or does it
I just tried switching it to that and it fixed the problem. All my other
scopes were domain.local. Guess I've just been lucky that nothing to this
point has cared in the past 7 years.
-Original Message-
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:28 PM
Have you tried uninstalling the drivers, uninstalling the adapter and letting
Windows redetect on a reboot?
Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org 8/19/2010 10:22 AM
Yep, it is a 64 bit only thing.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday,
Yep. However I just used the generic Windows ATI driver and it might be ok
nowfingers crossed.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ATI Catalyst drivers on Win7x64?
Have
Actually there is a quite a threat landscape on mobile devices, and its
only going to get worse, because of the lack of controls on them. Think
a remote wipe of a mobile device ( phone, BB, Iphone, Android, etc al)
is forensically sound... think again it isn't and the remote-wipe is
easy to
Generally little stuff - like you get different behavior when creating a DAG
depending on whether you create the DAG on a member server in the DAG or not.
Like in RTM you can't enter a fixed IP address from the GUI, you have to use
EMS. Like DAC occasionally gets confused about which is the
How much would Norton be sold to AMD for ???
--
Justin
IT-TECH
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Can AMD afford to purchase Symantec? Probably not...
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
Signature powered by WiseStamp http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, justino garcia
Then keep searching and let us know when you find it.
I'd rather spend 10 minutes with a script or scriptlet that I can get one or
more uses out of (and is easily transferable to other situations) than
paying for commercial software each and every time I need something --
especially if it turns
Wouldn't give two cents for either...
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:52 PM
To: NT System
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote:
Thank you. It works but, as I told you, for big folders with a lot of
subfolders and files ,you have to read line by line . I need something that
you can see at a glance like Windirstat
How do you propose to reduce hundreds of
Anyone know a website like nextsprocket.com but obviously with some
successful results where I can post a job request?
For anyone interested, I need a web based interface that can access
the live feed from this camera and interact with the Audio, specifically
we need to be able to communicate
symc is about twice the size of amd in terms of market cap, revenue, cash and
employees etc so not likely
From: Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 1:53:59 PM
Subject: Re:
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
