Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: Michael B. Smith
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
yes.
--
From: David W
yes.
From: David W. McSpadden [dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
Protocol SMTP interface Data1 (IP 10.0.10.15) on incoming connection (ICID
215625) from sender IP
How are you checking the DNS??
DNStools.net??
iptools.com???
- Original Message -
From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
On Fri, Sep
Looks like Ben is using dig.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Information_Groper
-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: 21 September 2009 14:31
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
How are you checking the DNS
thanks
- Original Message -
From: Ames Matthew B mba...@qinetiq.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
Looks like Ben is using dig.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:31 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
How are you checking the DNS??
DNStools.net??
iptools.com???
I don't like to depend on third-party web sites for this sort of
thing; you can never be sure what they're doing. I prefer to run
programs on my computer,
messge. Just said buy this service or fail to get messages.
I feel diry.
- Original Message -
From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction
.
- Original Message - From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com
I am constantly amazed that ATT remains in business. Their
incompetence is almost legendary.
-Original Message-
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 12:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
Turns
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
Turns out it is just smtp traffic to ATT cellphones.
Specifically my operators cellphones. Seems sometime on Saturday they
updated a rule that any smtp traffic sent to txt.att.net and coming
from
206.18.123.221 was to be accepted
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Robert Cato cato.rob...@gmail.com wrote:
My guess is that many/all telecom companies suffer from this same problem.
I prefer the shorter version: All telcos suck.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Specifically my operators cellphones. Seems sometime on Saturday they
updated a rule that any smtp traffic sent to txt.att.net and coming from
206.18.123.221 was to be accepted and then blackholed.
FYI, you appear
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Current: v=spf1 include:mailanyone.net include:fusemail.net ~all
Proposed v=spf1 include:mailanyone.net include:fusemail.net
include:imcu.local ~all ???
The proposed addition won't work for two reasons:
(1)
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com
wrote:
Current: v=spf1 include:mailanyone.net include:fusemail.net ~all
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
I need the following added then?
...
spf record v=spf1 ip4:206.18.123.221 include:fusemail.net
include:mailanyone.net ~all
If mail coming from the systems you operate (IronPort) will always
originate from IP address
was priceless.
- Original Message -
From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:15 PM, David W. McSpadden dav
Message -
From: Steven M. Caesare
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:17 AM
Subject: RE: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
What is this from?
This doesn't appear to be an SMTP conversation, but rather the logs from an
appliance (IronPort
Not an IronPort guy, but it sure looks like it's being delivered.
err...@imcu.com is an interesting address...
-sc
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction
You can ftp to the ironport device and check the bounce queue
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: 15 September 2009 13:53
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
Not an IronPort guy, but it sure looks like it's being delivered.
err
0 bounces.
- Original Message -
From: Fergal O'Connell
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
You can ftp to the ironport device and check the bounce queue
From: Steven M. Caesare
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:15 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Message 212050 to 3177141...@txt.att.net received remote
SMTP response 'Message received:
20090915111653.udfi13119.atledge02.cingularme@ironport.imcu.local'.
I don't know jack about IronPort, but the above looks
: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:15 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com
wrote:
Message 212050 to 3177141...@txt.att.net received remote
SMTP response 'Message received:
20090915111653.udfi13119.atledge02.cingularme@ironport.imcu.local'.
I don't know jack about
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Check the header to this email it is passing through the same Appliance to
get out of my network.
One of the many problems with Lyris (list server software used by
Sunbelt) is that it mangles headers heavily. If you
Subject: Re: Is this a good SMTP transaction?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com
wrote:
Check the header to this email it is passing through the same Appliance
to
get out of my network.
One of the many problems with Lyris (list server software used by
Sunbelt
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
One from Exchange, through the Ironport, to you.
One from a Webmail, outside the Ironport, to you.
After examining the headers, the two different messages appear to
take divergent paths.
According to Google's mail
25 matches
Mail list logo
