RE: Ping by name tool

} $ping = $null } log $routine "Cannot ping $server. $routine failed after 5 attempts." return $false } From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R

Re: Ping by name tool

NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: Ping by name tool oh hey http://www.myitforum.com/forums/m172057-print.aspx 4th reply. Looks to be PowerShell v1 stuff but seems to have what you asked about. $Computer = "remotecomputer.domain.com" if (

Re: Ping by name tool

oh hey http://www.myitforum.com/forums/m172057-print.aspx 4th reply. Looks to be PowerShell v1 stuff but seems to have what you asked about. $Computer = "remotecomputer.domain.com" if (($Ping = Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_PingStatus -Filter "Address='$Computer'").StatusCode -eq 0) { nbtstat -A $P

Re: Ping by name tool

You could do that easily with ping itself and the FOR command Give me some time and I might be able to dig out an example, if no-one else chimes in Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY -Original Message- From: David Lum Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:

Re: Ping by name tool

The BSonPosh module has a ton of stuff similar to this you could use as a starting point http://bsonposh.codeplex.com/ Since it's a script module you can open them up and see how they work as well. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:24 AM, David Lum wrote: > I’m looking for a ping tool that will ping

Re: Ping by name tool

And now for the function... function PingServers { $readfile = get-content $SourceDirectory\serverlist.txt foreach($server in $readfile) { $Alive = get-wmiobject win32_pingstatus -Filter "Address='$server'" | Select-Object statuscode if($Alive.statuscode -eq 0) { $Server} else { } } } On Wed, F

Re: Ping by name tool

Here's a function from a posh script I run for a completely different purpose that pings all the machines listed in a source text file. Perhaps you could add the other things you need and do it all in powershell. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:24 PM, David Lum wrote: > I’m looking for a ping tool

RE: Ping?

Thanks Richard. > -Original Message- > From: Richard McClary [mailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:26 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Ping? > > Would you like something like this? I'd be happy to forward this [

RE: Ping?

Would you like something like this? I'd be happy to forward this [whatever] if you wish... [1] 2012-09-13 07:19:50 [Root]system-critical-00441: ICMP ping id=0! >From 67.217.67.245 to 63.85.204.146, proto 1 (zone Untrust, int ethernet0/2). Occurred 1 times. [2] 2012-09-13 07:19:47 [Root

Re: Ping?

We saw your post but you are not. On Sep 12, 2012 8:04 PM, "Maglinger, Paul" wrote: > Anyone getting this? I've sent 2 posts and haven't seen either. > > -Paul > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~

RE: Ping help

dward Ziots CISSP, Security +, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping help On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:07 AM,

Re: Ping help

Have you checked the IPv6 DNS records for your DCs? Do they look right? On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Glen Johnson wrote: > Need help please. > We have 3 x 2008r2 domain controllers. > We've been fighting with some unusually slow domain logins and other > flakiness for a while. > For example

Re: Ping help

> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:24 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Ping help > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Glen Johnson wrote: >> Need help please. >> We have 3 x 2008r2 domain controllers. >> We've been fighting with some unusually slo

RE: Ping help

t for testing, I uninstalled Symantec AV. Only the AV part, no network threat protection. No change. The hunt continues. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping help On Tue, Jul 3,

Re: Ping help

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Glen Johnson wrote: > Need help please. > We have 3 x 2008r2 domain controllers. > We've been fighting with some unusually slow domain logins and other > flakiness for a while. > For example navigating between OUs in active directory users and computers is > pain

Re: Ping help

This is very similar to a situation I experienced the other day. It's all in a thread over on the Exchange list ("Exchange 2010 AD Topology service weirdness"). Unfortunately, I don't have a resolution for you. In addition to the Exchange issue, I saw exactly the same thing with slow logons, slo

RE: Ping attack attempts

You could always filter the ICMP ECHO type 8 on the firewall which basically will just not respond to these requests. Might be nicer to capture the packets and inspect them to see if anything else is going on.. Z Edward Ziots CISSP, Security +, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organ

Re: Ping attack attempts

Yes - live with it. If it's only a a few dozen pings an hour, it isn't worth it. I suppose you could send an email to the owner of the block. It's most likely something like smokeping or other network measurement tool that's been set up incorrectly. Kurt On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Richar

RE: ping

That's what SHE said! -sc From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:02 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: ping Don't encourage him. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Jeff Brown wrote: I thought it was pretty damn funny! And

RE: ping

See? I was so behind on the list I wasn't even aware that messages were being delayed by several days! -sc From: Jeff Brown [mailto:jbr...@webcoindustries.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ping I thought it was pretty damn funny!

Re: ping

4:07 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: ping > > ** ** > > On Thu, *Mar 1*, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > >> Nothing at all last night... > > On Thu, *Mar 8*, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Steven M. Caesare > wrote: > > Did she use the

RE: ping

Was it simply coincidence that "the original" was posted on International Women's Day? From: Jeff Brown [mailto:jbr...@webcoindustries.com] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 7:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: ping I thought it was pretty damn funny! And I got the origina

RE: ping

I thought it was pretty damn funny! And I got the original yesterday, as I presume he did. From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: ping On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kurt Buff mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com

RE: ping

From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: ping On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> Nothing at all last night... On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Did she us

Re: ping

On Thu, *Mar 1*, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> Nothing at all last night... On Thu, *Mar 8*, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Did she use the old "headache" excuse? Your witty response would have been more impressive if it hadn't taken a week for you to come up with it. ;-)

Re: ping

rimshot! On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 06:42, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Did she use the old "headache" excuse? > > -sc > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:31 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: ping >> >> Nothing

RE: ping

Did she use the old "headache" excuse? -sc > -Original Message- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:31 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: ping > > Nothing at all last night... > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a r

Re: ping

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > [ping] On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Ziots, Edward wrote: > PONG Wow. Ping latency of 27.5 hours. I would have expected TTL to expire by then. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: ping

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Nothing at all last night... Try www.cupid.com -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.

RE: ping

PONG Z Edward Ziots CISSP, Security +, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: ping Nothing at all last night... ~

Re: Ping testing tool

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:21, David Lum wrote: > Anyone have a favorite free ping test tool? I am looking for pinging a few > hosts every 15 seconds and give me an up/down as well as response and > average over the last xx period of time. No alerting necessary. If you want to get fancy, try smok

RE: Ping testing tool

email:ezi...@lifespan.org phone:401-639-3505 From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping testing tool With PowerShell v2 you'd want to use Test-Connection PS:> test-connection -computername

RE: Ping testing tool

mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping testing tool With PowerShell v2 you'd want to use Test-Connection PS:> test-connection -computername server01, server02, server12 Of course, you'd have to build in the data c

Re: Ping testing tool

t; > *Gainesville, Fl 32607* > > *Office (352) 244-1610* > > *Cell (352) 215-6944* > > *MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP**4, VTSP4* > > ** ** > > *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:35 PM

RE: Ping testing tool

Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping testing tool This might be a good powershell project if you haven't gotten your hands dirty with it yet. On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:21 PM, David Lum mailto:david@nwe

Re: Ping testing tool

This might be a good powershell project if you haven't gotten your hands dirty with it yet. On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:21 PM, David Lum wrote: > Anyone have a favorite free ping test tool? I am looking for pinging a > few hosts every 15 seconds and give me an up/down as well as response and > a

Re: Ping testing tool

This one works pretty good. Can ping multiple hosts and has a nice interface. http://www.nessoft.com/multiping/ -- Bob Hartung Dir of I.T. Wisco Industries, Inc. 736 Janesville St. Oregon, WI 53575 Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215 Fax: (608) 835-7399 e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com

RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

doubt that port 8000 is allowed on our network. From: bounce-9313812-8239...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9313812-8239...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Stu Sjouwerman Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4 We

Re: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

>> >> What if Adblock wasn’t actually excluding anything for that page? Does it >> still do something behind the scenes that would mess it up?) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gm

Re: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

thing for that page? Does it > still do something behind the scenes that would mess it up?) > > > > > > > > *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2011 12:33 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:

RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

Still confused. It was doing it for me on Chrome too. Just checked - I don't have Adblock installed on Chrome. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:12 PM To: 'NT System Admin Issues' Subject: RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4 I guess I could fath

RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping Stu: KnowBe4 Not speaking for this circumstance, but ad-blocking can cause page load delays when something has been written incorrectly or intentionally to do so. -- ME2 On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Sam Cayze wrote: Wait, Ad-Block was causing it? I s

Re: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

gt; on your domain… > > -Sam > > > > *From:* Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2011 11:45 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4 > > > > We figured out what this was. It's a brow

RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

Wait, Ad-Block was causing it? I solved it by enabling adblock filtering on your domain. -Sam From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4 We figured out what this was. It

Re: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 05, 2011 11:17 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4 > > Looks like loading core.js, main.js, transformer.js, validator.js, and > messages.js from 2ri.static.w2l.gurl.im:8000 is timing out and delaying > the page loa

RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

c.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 11:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4 Looks like loading core.js, main.js, transformer.js, validator.js, and messages.js from 2ri.static.w2l.gurl.im:8000 is timing out and delaying the page load. From: bounce-9311516

RE: Ping Stu: KnowBe4

Looks like loading core.js, main.js, transformer.js, validator.js, and messages.js from 2ri.static.w2l.gurl.im:8000 is timing out and delaying the page load. From: bounce-9311516-8239...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9311516-8239...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Sam Cayze

RE: Ping...

@eaglemds.com> From: Maglinger, Paul [pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping... Why do you guys do this to me… I have too much to do than be distracted by this! :) From: Raper, Jonathan - E

RE: Ping...

Good idea. Glad I thought of it! -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:11 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping... On 27 May 2010 at 11:13, Maglinger, Paul wrote: > Sorry for the "ping", but

RE: Ping...

Why do you guys do this to me... I have too much to do than be distracted by this! J From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping... http://www.ugoplayer.com/games/pong.html Jonathan

Re: Ping...

On 27 May 2010 at 11:13, Maglinger, Paul wrote: > Sorry for the "ping", but I don't think I'm getting messages back that > I'm sending to the list. Either that or the message isn't making it to > the list to begin with, in which case I won't get any replies because > y'all won't see it. When I

RE: Ping...

"mean" as in that is average for me? J Webster From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Subject: RE: Ping... That's just mean.. Shook From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Subject: RE: Ping... We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! J

Re: Ping...

LOL, thanks Webster, you just made me laugh out loud!! On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Webster wrote: > We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! J > > > > > > Webster > > > > *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] > *Subject:* RE: Ping... > &g

RE: Ping...

That's just mean Shook From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping... We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! :) Webster From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Subject: RE: Ping... And the iro

RE: Ping...

We can all hope and pray Shooky Baby! J Webster From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Subject: RE: Ping... And the irony of that just kills me.. Shook From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Ping... As I recall, OOO's seem to be

RE: Ping...

mailto:nel...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping... The machine that goes Ping... 2010/5/27 Dave Florea mailto:blazer...@gmail.com>> Pong --Original Message-- From: Mathew Shember To: NT System Admin Issues ReplyTo: NT System Admi

Re: Ping...

M > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Ping... > > > > As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list... > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Manuel Santos wrote: > > The machine that goes Ping... > > 2010/5/27 Dave Florea > > > >

RE: Ping...

And the irony of that just kills me Shook From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping... As I recall, OOO's seem to be more common on the Exchange list... On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:33 PM, M

Re: Ping...

NT System Admin Issues >> ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: Ping... >> Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM >> >> Ping... >> >> -Original Message- >> From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:1

Re: Ping...

The machine that goes Ping... 2010/5/27 Dave Florea > Pong > --Original Message-- > From: Mathew Shember > To: NT System Admin Issues > ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Ping... > Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM > > Ping... > > -Orig

Re: Ping...

Pong --Original Message-- From: Mathew Shember To: NT System Admin Issues ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping... Sent: May 27, 2010 9:16 AM Ping... -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM To: NT

Re: Ping...

Tough crowd. Gotta have thick skin to play here... On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Sean Houston wrote: > I like how you don't just assume we're all ignoring you... > > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Maglinger, Paul wrote: > >> Sorry for the "ping", but I don't think I'm getting messages b

RE: Ping...

From: Sean Houston [mailto:seanthous...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping... I like how you don't just assume we're all ignoring you... On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Maglinger, Paul wrote: Sorry for the "ping", but

Re: Ping...

tabletennis ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~

Re: Ping...

I like how you don't just assume we're all ignoring you... On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Maglinger, Paul wrote: > Sorry for the "ping", but I don't think I'm getting messages back that > I'm sending to the list. Either that or the message isn't making it to > the list to begin with, in which

RE: Ping...

(CC'd you directly) I saw it on-list.. -sc > -Original Message- > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Ping... > > Sorry for the "ping", but I don't think I'm getting messages back that I'm > s

RE: Ping...

Ping... -Original Message- From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping... Pong... -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM

RE: Ping...

Pong... -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Ping... Sorry for the "ping", but I don't think I'm getting messages back that I'm sending to the list. Either that or the message isn'

RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6?

at it. -Bonnie -Original Message- From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 2:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6? Funny you mention that. I've got a friend at MS who I just asked this question

RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6?

03, 2009 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6? We disable IPv6 as part of our build procedure. Binding order shows IPv4 first. Not sure what is up here. Doesn't seem to be affecting anything, but I'd love to track down what is causing this. T

RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6?

PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6? Hmmm... ours don't seem to do that, but we've disabled IPv6 since we're not using it yet. Are you trying to run both protocols, but get it to default to IPv4? If so, have you tried changing the binding orde

RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6?

[christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6? Funny you mention that. I've got a friend at MS who I just asked this question to, and he gave me a very similar answer. It seems internally the word is "

RE: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6?

How about: C:>ping -4 MYSERVER -Malcolm -Original Message- From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 11:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: PING on W2K8 server uisng IPv6? OK so if I ping the localhost on a W2K8 box by hostname

Re: Ping Shazad: Data replication in real-time (or near real-time)

Hi Sam, I'm not using partial file updating myself but I've seen it used on 1TB file server where it was able to handle 5GB files (TrueCrypt). I would try emailing the developer as he's usually very helpful. Shazad On 23 Jul 2009, at 22:12, Sam Cayze wrote: > Are you using Partial File updat

Re: Ping?

o: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Ping? > > That's what they said the last time you were hunting and the banjo music > stopped... > TVK > > > -Original Message- > From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:18 PM >

RE: Ping?

http://www.tshirtoutlet.com/8118ny.html -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping? That's what they said the last time you were hunting and the banjo music stopped..

Re: Ping?

uly 17, 2009 4:18 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Ping? > > It wasn't American, the pitch is too high... > > Shook > > From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:56 PM > To: NT System

RE: Ping?

That's what they said the last time you were hunting and the banjo music stopped... TVK -Original Message- From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping? It wasn't American, the pitch i

RE: Ping?

It wasn't American, the pitch is too high... Shook From: John Cook [john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping? Hey, I think someone just shot a torpedo at us! John W. Cook Systems Administ

RE: Ping?

- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping? On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Bob Fronk wrote: > Give me a ping, Vasili. One ping only, please. "Most things in here don't react too well to bullet

Re: Ping?

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Bob Fronk wrote: > Give me a ping, Vasili. One ping only, please. "Most things in here don't react too well to bullets..." -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~

RE: Ping?

I'll pick them thankyouverymuch. "MilliVanilli" -sc > -Original Message- > From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:45 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Ping? > > Or misogynist > > -

RE: Ping?

That can sting. -sc > -Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:32 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Ping? > > I've been told that se-men can be surprising. I wouldn&#x

RE: Ping?

Or misogynist -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 2:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping? It changes with my mood. Now it's Miscreant. -sc > -Original Message- > From: Kim Longenbaug

RE: Ping?

It's already being used. I was working with a vendor and his tech support guy would say, "ping me when you're ready to move forward." > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:46:23 -0700 > From: drkuhl...@yahoo.com > Subject: Re: Ping? > To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-sof

RE: Ping?

Reminds me of Mr. Burns saying seamen and women don't mix. > From: michealespin...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:32:11 -0400 > Subject: Re: Ping? > To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > > I've been told that se-men can be surprising. I wouldn&

Re: Ping?

ry [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:27 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Ping? > > > > Meh.  I knew that one. > Did you know that Clancy finally found a publisher for it since everybody > else turned it down?  It turned out

RE: Ping?

I did not. Great stuff from that bunch of seamen. -sc From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping? Meh. I knew that one. Did you know that Clancy finally found a publisher for it since

RE: Ping?

Meh. I knew that one. Did you know that Clancy finally found a publisher for it since everybody else turned it down? It turned out to be the best selling book the Naval Institute Press ever had. > From: scaes...@caesare.com > Subject: RE: Ping? > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:34:40 -

RE: Ping?

It changes with my mood. Now it's Miscreant. -sc > -Original Message- > From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:17 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Ping? > > I thought it was "bing, bing bing&

RE: Ping?

I thought it was "bing, bing bing" that richochet rabbit liked to say. Yeah, Misfit, that was Snagglepus. -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 2:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping? Wasn't

RE: Ping?

Wasn't that Snagglepus? -sc > -Original Message- > From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:00 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Ping? > > Exit stage left... > - Original Message - > From: &quo

Re: Ping?

Yes.. On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Orland, Kathleen wrote: > Does anyone remember... ping Ping PING - Richochet Rabbit? > > - Original Message - > From: "Don Kuhlman" > To: "NT System Admin Issues" > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 1:46 PM >

Re: Ping?

Exit stage left... - Original Message - From: "Orland, Kathleen" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 2:55 PM Subject: Re: Ping? Does anyone remember... ping Ping PING - Richochet Rabbit? - Original Message - From: "Don Kuhlma

Re: Ping?

Does anyone remember... ping Ping PING - Richochet Rabbit? - Original Message - From: "Don Kuhlman" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 1:46 PM Subject: Re: Ping? How about as a business buzzword - I'm getting Pinged by everyone for stat

RE: Ping?

uly 17, 2009 12:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping? You'll surely know what it is if you are a diver and you be messing with Nemo when you are supposed to be topside. The transducer which we lowered from the hull of our Navy frigate was rated at 250 watts and in water th

Re: Ping?

Awesome ref... -- ME2 On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Bob Fronk wrote: > Give me a ping, Vasili. One ping only, please. > > -- > Bob > > > > -Original Message- > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:39 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Sub

Re: Ping?

How about as a business buzzword - I'm getting Pinged by everyone for status on your issue...Please Ping me when you get a chance so we can go over the plan... Don K - Original Message From: Sam Cayze To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 12:33:31 PM Subjec

RE: Ping?

Ping noun 1: a river in western Thailand; a major tributary of the Chao Phraya [syn: {Ping River}] 2: a sharp high-pitched resonant sound (as of a sonar echo or a bullet striking metal) ALSO: The funniest use of 'ping' to date was described in January 1991 by Steve Hayman on the Usenet group com

RE: Ping?

THfRO! Man I'm good -sc -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 1:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ping? Give me a ping, Vasili. One ping only, please. -- Bob -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]

  1   2   >