]
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 19, 2010 7:58 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
So did the script I posted make it to the list? I'm starting to wonder if
some filter may have blocked the e-mail since I just pasted the code in the
body
...@prufoxroach.com
From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 6:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
First, thanks for all of the feedback. Some interesting opinions out
there. I've always been open
hic! thso fwaht?!
--
ME2
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Script lush!
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
Its always welcomed to share useful scripts!
--
ME2
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at
As promised. IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent. The
script relies on a text file with server names. I'm sure there will be
questions as to why it was written the way it was so I'll do my best to
answer those as they come up.
By the way, I can't take any credit for this one. My co-worker put it
together.
- Sean
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote:
As promised. IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent. The
script relies on a text file with server names. I'm sure
Nice little script...
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 13:11, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
As promised. IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent. The
script relies on a text file with server names. I'm sure there will be
questions as to why it was written the way it was so
Yes, it did.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 7:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
So did the script I posted
Thanks for the input Ben/Jon. I'll take a look at the Microsoft Script
Center and then maybe I'll have a better idea what Ben was talking about.
Jonathan, I'd say that's definitely food for thought. I'd have to discuss
with my peers if there's any specific reason all servers are configured
+1
If you are going to do the work of manually configuring specific IP
addresses, why not do it in a way that is centrally manageable?
Although you did say servers... I would still go with DHCP possible.
--
ME2
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
11:52
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
+1
If you are going to do the work of manually configuring specific IP
addresses, why not do it in a way that is centrally manageable?
Although you did say servers... I would still go with DHCP possible
will be a non-trivial
operational workload in a dynamic data center.
-Malcolm
*From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:52
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
+1
If you are going to do
Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
So I've heard and have worked in similar environments, but, I have never
heard a convincing argument for it as a security concern.
It can be quite easy in a properly planned and operated environment. I
honestly dont take any aspects
Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 13:35
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
So I've heard and have worked in similar environments, but, I have never
heard a convincing argument for it as a security concern
You could also statically assign an IP address to a server in DHCP. Best of
both worlds? J
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
Centralized = good; I'm with you on that!
-Malcolm
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 14:53
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
Not often at all. There is definitely a case for either way
reasons. Also, managing DHCP reservations will be a non-trivial
operational workload in a dynamic data center.
-Malcolm
*From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:52
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Scripting IP Changes
*From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:52
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
+1
If you are going to do the work of manually configuring specific IP
addresses, why not do it in a way
:* Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
+1
If you are going to do the work of manually configuring specific IP
addresses, why not do it in a way that is centrally manageable?
Although you did say servers... I would still go with DHCP possible.
--
ME2
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3
// (Cell) 503.267.9764
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scripting IP Changes on remote devices
Which leads back to what your environment is like, how it is segmented, how it
is controlled, etc
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
What are some of the pros/cons of using DHCP for servers...?
For an environment like you describe, with hundreds of servers, I
would recommend DHCP for all but critical network infrastructure
servers. I'd use manual
First, thanks for all of the feedback. Some interesting opinions out there.
I've always been open to change so it's good to hear all of the
positives/negatives regarding which route to take. It sounds like DHCP would
be the way to go with the majority of our servers, excluding the
infrastructure
Its always welcomed to share useful scripts!
--
ME2
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
First, thanks for all of the feedback. Some interesting opinions out there.
I've always been open to change so it's good to hear all of the
positives/negatives
Script lush!
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
Its always welcomed to share useful scripts!
--
ME2
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote:
First, thanks for all of the feedback. Some interesting
Have you looked on the Microsoft Scripting Guys site yet? I seem to
remember seeing some mention of one there at one point in time.
Jon
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Good Morning/Afternoon,
I'm looking for a little assistance with automating IP
This is fairly easy to do with WMI. You just want to iterate through the
IPEnabled adapters collection and there are methods to stamp WINS and DNS
servers. I'd suggest inspecting the current settings and using that data to
decide whether you stamp or not.
WINS is a simple primary/secondary
Any reason to have static? Consider DHCP with reservations so this
kind of transition could be managed centrally in the future? As long
as your rolling out the script you could have it switch from static to
dynic and be done. Of course all this is predicated on not having a
major reasons to be
26 matches
Mail list logo
