On 10 Nov 2010 at 15:22, Joseph Heaton wrote:
Bad weather event? wow, the rivers would have to be really over the banks
for that to happen here in Sacramento. No snow, no tornados, man we don't
get any of that fun stuff.
Earthquake upgrades force temporary move for Sacramento's St.
Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache for
one day.
We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay, while
us techs moved and setup all the workstations/servers/etc... We talked about
having
have is TS Gateway. I think I can get there in 3-4 weeks
and have some testing time, but we'll see...
Dave
--
*From:* Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:58 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Terminal Server
Issues
*Subject:* Re: Terminal Server or VPN?
Sometimes you don't really have a choice, as it makes good business sense
to allow it.
A VPN can be configured to allow appropriate-only access. It does not
have to be synonymous with a free-for-all connection.
The TS solution has licensing
Yep that’s one item I am checking out now, thanks!
Dave
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too
Have you looked at the TS / RD Gateway feature? It's
Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache
for one day.
We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay,
while us techs moved and setup all the workstations/servers/etc. We talked
about having employees, like data entry, work from home.
Likewise 400 miles south on the I5 ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
Bad weather event? wow, the rivers would have to be really over the banks
.
Of course, the two guys heading up VRX are fellow CTPs! J
Thanks
Carl Webster
Citrix Technology Professional
http://dabcc.com/Webster
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too
Andrew this is actually my thinking
Excellent reference point, thanks Carl!
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN? Now TS on VM Q's too
I am not a TS person and have only ever setup 1 pure TS in my career. I would
Did the 'talent' get the day off with pay too? :-)
On 11/11/10, Jacob ja...@excaliburfilms.com wrote:
Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache
for one day.
We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay,
while us techs moved and
Did the 'talent' get the day off with pay too? :-)
On 11/11/10, Jacob ja...@excaliburfilms.com wrote:
Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a headache
for one day.
We had to move back in April. We gave the employees Friday off, with pay,
while us techs moved and
Their work is already in the can, as it were.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Did the 'talent' get the day off with pay too? :-)
On 11/11/10, Jacob ja...@excaliburfilms.com wrote:
Just one day.. I would just give them the day off. Too much of a
I think they're on a break. Probably having fluffernutters.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Their work is already in the can, as it were.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Did the 'talent' get the day off
Might be a good chance to get up to speed on TS. We have a TS 2008 farm
here, but I'm moving those servers to XenApp. It worked fine, although
I had some issues with wildcard certificates. I think that was an issue
with the version and is not presented in 2008 R2 from what I understand.
Use
I would never, ever, allow non-company-managed PCs to connect to our VPN. As
you think, that's just asking for all kinds of trouble.
Since most of your home users won't have MS Office on their home PCs,
they'll get more done if you give them TS access to your standard corporate
suite of
If their PCs are available for remoting into, just use TS Gateway on the
2008 terminal server. (I think it's called RD Gateway on R2). It's really
easy to configure and there's nothing else to do.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Malcolm Reitz malcolm.re...@live.comwrote:
I would never, ever,
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
I would never, ever, allow non-company-managed PCs to connect to our VPN. As
you think, that's just asking for all kinds of trouble.
Since most of your home users won't have MS Office on their home PCs, they'll
get more done if you
My preference would be for a good web-based SSL VPN solution. For your
size of environment, SonicWall has some nice appliances that allow
ActiveX and Java apps (so that even folks with Mac and *Nix boxes can
get in) that provide a great RDP session interface in a web browser,
as well as file
Have you considered something like LogMeIn for remote access? Perhaps a
trial during the month of December so you can cover that one day.
Roger Wright
___
Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what
you do today might burn your butt tomorrow.
On Wed, Nov
Sometimes you don't really have a choice, as it makes good business sense to
allow it.
A VPN can be configured to allow appropriate-only access. It does not have
to be synonymous with a free-for-all connection.
The TS solution has licensing implications, as well. Hopefully, 5 weeks is
enough
this
opportunity to treat it as a bad weather event to simulate the weather being
too bad for 95% of the folks to get into the office.
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
I
Yours are mostly economic events!
Webster
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
Bad weather event? wow, the rivers would have to be really over the banks
for that to happen here in Sacramento. No snow
a decrease in the amount lost seems like a raise...
Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com 11/10/2010 3:33 PM
Yours are mostly economic events!
Webster
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
Bad weather event? wow, the rivers
: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
I would never, ever, allow non-company-managed PCs to connect to our VPN. As
you think, that's just asking for all kinds of trouble.
Since most of your home users won't have MS Office
to simulate the weather
being too bad for 95% of the folks to get into the office.
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Server or VPN?
I would never, ever, allow non-company-managed
I'd go with the TS/RD Gateway option. It is very very easy to configure and
just works imo. TS/RD Gateway can be configured to allow members of security
groups to only be able to rdp to certain machines etc.
We don't allow any VPN access as it just isn't necessary.
From: David Lum
, but we'll see...
Dave
From: Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Terminal Server or VPN?
Sometimes you don't really have a choice, as it makes good business sense to
allow it.
A VPN
I can get there in 3-4 weeks
and have some testing time, but we'll see...
Dave
--
*From:* Andrew S. Baker [asbz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:58 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Terminal Server or VPN?
Sometimes you
28 matches
Mail list logo
