Title: RE: Repetitive posts
It is hard to tell when a question has been answered. I sent a response to a question early this morning, but my response didn't hit the server for quite a while. By the time it did hit, there had already been several responses from other list members. (Which I
'Zactly. Let's leave the moderating to Stu.
-Original Message-
From: Richard McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Repetitive posts
Just one problem with this - email delivery is not instant. I often get
Just one problem with this - email delivery is not instant. I often get
many follow-up postings before I receive the original question.
Sure, there are some sloppy folks out there (and I have seen several folks
say Do this... when the frustrated poster has already mentioned that
this did not
This list is high volume. But much of that can be cured by people reading
the rest of the posts to see if the question's been answered already -
before they post their answer.
Case in point: there must've been 20 Memphis responses to the Win98 Code
name question and a similar number of
by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.
-Original Message-
From: Richard McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Repetitive posts
Just one problem
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dewar Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 25, 2001 11:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Repetitive posts
'Zactly. Let's leave the moderating to Stu.
-Original Message-
From: Richard McClary [mailto
You're absolutely right and I think that the lack of bandwidth and/or
processing power of the list server is only contributing to the high volume
as a result (my last 2 posts took 3 hours), unless the delay is due to
moderation.
As much as I appreciate this list, it seems clear that Sunbelt
