Yeah, that appears within 2 seconds now.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Za Vue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Vista SP1 Bug Already?
I hope to solve my
For me - it made a major difference. I'm very glad I was on the beta.
Other people report little or no impact.
I'm one of the weird ones though J I like Vista anyway.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Christopher J. Bosak
I implemented this last year - it worked well and we liked it except for the
lack of security (that is, there was no tie-in to Windows groups) and the
like of a WYSIWYG editor. This is what we used before we went to WSS 3.0.
Perhaps they've corrected those issues.
Regards,
Michael B
There are TOCs and auto-linking. It supports SharePoint templates. And
category-wise, it supports group-based security.
Perhaps it isn't a wiki for purists - but it does a lot.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben
I didn't run into any compatibility updates and it recognized a piece of
hardware that it never had before (a video capture card).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Butts, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Bah.
It's just about automation. I don't believe in repeating things time after
time after time after.well, you get the idea.
SCE does everything I ever wrote, and does it better. And it's cheaper than
I am, too. J
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http
Just a quick FYI Trend sent out a bad DAT version 4.995 around 10AM EST
today (2/12/08). If you are running Trend and have an issue you need to roll
back to 4.993. Problems experienced include extremely high disk I/O load and
network problems.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
I'm using, in my home office, a Lexmark 5470, for which I paid $75 on sale
at Christmas. But I only use it for scanning and faxing - I'm very low usage
on paper.
I've not needed tech support, I would expect, to use Ben's word, for it to
be non-existent.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange
About one and a half full-timers.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 175 servers
Here's an open-ended question
If, after the first time you've installed it, go back to Windows Update and
tell it to check for updates again, it'll stop.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lemonidis (NTL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
http://swinc.com/resources/free.asp
dequeue.exe?
If that isn't what you want, please be a little more descriptive.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008
How good are your backups and how good are you at restoring them?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 1:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Actually, assuming you dot your I's and cross your T's, that sounds like it
should work.
Having the drivers loaded on the image you create is important.
What does answers on a postcard mean?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message
Hmmm. I did throw a reboot in there too. Sorry that I forgot to mention it.
I did the reboot and then the rescan.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008
I can't keep up with all the threads you've got going right now - but as
long as your drivers are cool, the image should be cool, and you should be
cool.
Where cool means good on this side of the pond. ;-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
Speaking of same:
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/blogs/mowgreen/index.php?showentry=1240
Apparently it's only an issue with x64.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
You didn't say what server OS version - but the diskshadow tool in Server 2008
can help you with this.
From: Steph Balog [validemai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Shadow Copy Management
Is there any
that depends to a certain degree how you are going to do it.
for example, using OpenDSObject() would just fail if the passed username and
password aren't proper.
but a strict answer to your question is read i believe.
From: Kennedy, Jim
That article should be taken out and SHOT. Microsoft doesn't change it because
it's easier for PSS to say install WINS than it is to explain how to properly
configure short name resolution.
This is the key paragraph - throw the rest of it away:
Exchange 2003 uses Windows name resolution APIs
.
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Disabling NETBIOS
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote:
That article should be taken out and SHOT. Microsoft doesn't
Absolutely.
JUst FYI, if you ask me 'how', I'll point you at technet/msdn. :-)
From: Sam Cayze [sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BITS question
Curious, can other Apps use BITS?
there?!?! IMO they should be using it.
:)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BITS question
Absolutely.
JUst FYI, if you ask me 'how', I'll point you at technet
Yes, and they take a damn long time to transfer too.
Best practice for pagefile size on 64-bit Exchange Servers is RAM + 15 MB.
And page file space is only loosely correlated to paging out. I've got a
great presentation on this topic that was made in a closed forum by Mark
Russinovich (of
at 4:57 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote:
Yes, and they take a damn long time to transfer too.
Best practice for pagefile size on 64-bit Exchange Servers is RAM + 15 MB.
And page file space is only loosely correlated to paging out. I've got
I find that truly unexpected and shocking.
If I were to guess - he was ready to move on.
From: Ken Schaefer [...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 8:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Steve Riley - good bye and good luck
release number (i.e 7.0), and is still within the 6.x cycle.
--
ME2
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote:
what you commonly see in the non-public presentations is why something is the
way it is and some discussions about
It's a wrapping issue. Lyris doesn't know how to properly expand an OWA
RTF'ed MIME reply.
But guess what - I'm using OWA 2010 and it works fine because they went to
straight HTML email... :-)
From: Tim Vander Kooi [tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Thursday,
but you are neither blond nor a bimbo! :-)
From: Free, Bob [r...@pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 1:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email rejecting
I'll venture :-)
Winmail.dat attached by OWA that Lyris doesn't like
Bring it on MBS
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 3:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS
Yes, and they take a damn long time to transfer too.
Best practice for pagefile size
why powershell?
adfind -default -f ((objectcategory=user)(objectclass=person))
samaccountname memberof -csv -nodn
(and believe me, if I thought that PowerShell was the best tool for the job, I
would tell you.)
adfind is available at http://www.joeware.nethttp://www.joeware.net/
It could be written...but it would be expensive in terms of processing
resources.
From: James Rankin [kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AD groups search to find out where group is all applied in
One of my clients has something called Varonis that tracks security changes
to file systems. They like it because it allows them (among the security
changes) to see when a user has, for example, picked up a folder and moved it
under another folder.
I do AD and Exchange for them, I'm not
Using vssadmin list shadows or diskshadow list shadows all provides you
output that can be easily parsed via PowerShell to get you the creation dates.
Then, you can use either of those two utilities to delete the shadow copies.
From: Steph Balog
Not when I took it.
From: Brumbaugh, Luke [luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT:70-640 Test
Was most of this test, Certificate services and Federation? That’s most of
the questions in
on the test's objective domain.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
Monitoring Exchange w/OpsMgr now available http://snurl.com/45ppf
From: Brumbaugh, Luke [luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com]
Sent
mgmt = dip $sh1T$
sr. mgmt = dip $sh1T$ + dumb $sh1T$
(having been sr. mgmt twice in my career, I'm qualified to say that.)
From: Andy Shook [andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT-RE:
There is always a PEAPing Tim VK around here...
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 17,5 mill Hard Drive
Two PEAPing Tom's in my Windows...
--
ME2
On Wed, May 27,
1 / 5.6 = 17%; pretty average for a SIS factor.
Compression of content will more than make up for it.
Wherever possible, E14 will compress content prior to storing it into the
mailbox database. The cost of doing this is far less than the cost of the extra
I/O.
As Brian notes - JBOD containing
The general plan here is to improve performance when you have large mailboxes.
Most, but not all (granted) folks would say that it's OK to use more disk
space if that effectively removes a key performance blocker.
SIS was designed and implemented when Exchange supported a SINGLE database and
regression testing, and which bean counters wanted culled? I'm
shocked... :-)
Cheers
Ken
From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, 1 June 2009 1:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Amusing
The general plan here
You said it yourself: use CALL.
CALL /?
for more information.
From: Joseph L. Casale [jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 1:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Dos Nested FOR Loops
Hey guys,
how comes this doesn't execute the
Google sells HARD toward select medium-sized businesses.
They go in and talk about backups and infrastructure and expensive
administrators and how, with a Google solution, you don't have to have any of
those.
That speaks to management where in counts - in the PL statement.
That's why I said
That's pretty good.
You can (i.e., the royal you, the OP) do what you want with OpsMgr. If an
e-mail didn't get sent - generate an alert. It's pretty easy.
But if you don't have OpsMgr - well, forget my idea. :-P
From: Jacob [ja...@excaliburfilms.com]
Sent:
Someone else mentioned it, but I'm using (more and more, but not exclusively)
Polymon.
It's pretty darned good. Especially for free!
From: Erik Goldoff [egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: server
I wrote a five-part series on my blog on using PowerShell for accessing
different database platforms.
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/01/07/multi-platform-database-access-with-powershell.aspx
Using those routines, it should be trivial to adapt to PostgresSQL.
As I did then, I still will now - respectfully disagree.
There are use cases that newsid addresses which sysprep does not.
In the best of all possible worlds, sysprep is the right answer.But I often
don't live in the best of all possible worlds.
From:
There is a machine SID which is unique to a machine, that is generated during
installation. That never changes. There is also a domain SID that is generated
when a machine joins a domain (for the computer account).
From: John Hornbuckle
No, it shouldn't. The generalize process should generate a unique SID for
every non-cloned installation.
From: Joe Heaton [jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewSID
Could be...that would do it?
...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 2:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewSID
Is there a problem with having duplicate machine SIDs, so long as the domain
SIDs are unique?
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday
Why do you think Win7 is any different?
It has the same security model as Vista.
It has the same driver model as Vista.
Vista RTM had challenges. Modern Vista really doesn't.
Win7 may be marginally faster than Vista (I see a slightly snappier GUI - but I
don't see any compute intensive tasks
Not true.
The entire SMTP session is available to administrators with Exchange.
GMail doesn't make that information available to ANYone.
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 5:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:
I would do the test in a script that executes immediately before your
diskshadow execution.
Use VSSADMIN LIST SHADOWS to look at the existing shadows. With PowerShell,
parsing the messy output is a snap. Again using VSSADMIN, delete the bad
shadowcopies.
Alternately, you could run something
Camtasia - which isn't free but does like a gazillion things. (Note: there is a
CamStudio which is free, but has much less feature content)
I also use Debut Video Capture Software of which there is a free version.
From: Eric Wittersheim
So do Quest, Lucid8, and AppAssure.
(Note: I've reviewed software from all of these companies for compensation, in
the past.)
And shockingly, it only takes a few thousand lines of MAPI code to do it for
yourself. :-)
(For a mount-able database. Being able to do it with a database that will
I did get it taken care of, didn't I?
Haven't you looked at the change in behavior as of about UR6/7 to sp1?
Or am I mis-remembering the specific issue we discussed?
From: Joseph L. Casale [jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:26 PM
It WILL work with Exchange 2007, given the caveat of ANSI PSTs vs Unicode
PSTs.
However, it is not supported.
And don't get me started on thatI can write 500 or so lines of C++ MAPI
that will do the same thing as ExMerge (well, just for the export piece) and
that IS supported, but ExMerge
hey - they need SOME reason to get you to upgrade.
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Google Mail
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
Unless it's SQL Express.
But there is now a SQL Server Web Edition that is approximately equivalent to
SQL Server Workgroup.
From: Joe Heaton [jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Licensing
Eh, the main changes in Vista (and Server 2008, and Win7 and Server 2008 R2,
etc. etc.) were to provide the programmer with more control and fewer
limitations.
For example, you no longer have an effective 300 MB limit on the size of event
logs, as you did pre-Vista.
For example, you can have
I've deployed 3 commercial solutions in this space: Quest, NetWrix, and NetPro
(purchased by Quest last year). I'm pretty sure the NetWrix and NetPro
solutions didnt' REQUIRE a domain, but I can't currently access them to verify.
I could develop something for you in a few days probably,
With the current administration?
I doubt it.
(Darn it, I broke my general rule to stay out of political discussions.)
From: Kurt Buff [kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 7:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Meanwhile, in the
Interesting.
I've got literally thousands of HP printers running the UPD (v5).
From: Phil Brutsche [p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bleep'n window server 2008 terminal server
Tried it.
SBS assumes - for good reason - that you've followed their procedures and their
wizards and their setup lists for configuring your server.
IF you do that, you won't get that message. You can also go through the
console and specify that you've already done that to suppress the message.
boys boys boys...
relativistic time is still only a hypothesis. while it apparently describes
certain events that occur in the universe, until a human object is accelerated
to relativistic speeds, decelerates, and then returns to earth (with or without
an additional relativistic interval
The Sunbelt Exchange list is the highest volume list around. There are also
several Yahoo Lists that have volume and good folks. MSExchange.org also runs
an Exchange list.
Outside of those, you have the Microsoft forums.
Now, most of the issues you report are SBS issues. And yep, they can be
RDP in Vista (and above) and Server 2008 (and above) provide the capability of
TLS-encrypting the RDP sessions - built in.
The updated RDP client is available for XP/2003 via Microsoft Update.
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July
And you've now re-invented Remote Web Workplace, available in SBS 2003 and
EBS/SBS 2008...
From: mikeMitchell [its.m...@analogy.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 2:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Services question
I set up a TS
NTOP and WireShark are good choices...but don't forget Microsoft's Network
Monitor 3.3. I think it has the best protocol analyzer's available. And it's
free.
From: Cameron Cooper [ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:46 AM
To: NT System Admin
I would start with web analytics software so you can determine which
transactions are specifically at issue, concurrent with that - what does
perfmon have to say?
From: Andy Shook [andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:44 PM
To: NT System Admin
ah, i misunderstood.
that capability is there - it's part of network access control; but i've
never deployed it and i know next to nothing about it, i'm afraid.
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:28 PM
To: NT System
Shookie-pooh.
From: Webster [carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Terminal Services question
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Subject
My advice to you (and all other readers) - don't depend on default behavior.
Specify all available parameters.
From: Oliver Marshall [oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Import-mailbox duplicate
Oh?
And what fully-featured Email/PIM do you find to be more stable than Outlook?
From: David Lum [david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Gmail
So has Outlook….
From: Sherry Abercrombie
admin
for many years, many versions. (Exchange admin as well but I can't say
Exchange didn't go down, but I hear 2010 is real good.)
Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com 7/7/2009 7:35 PM
Oh?
And what fully-featured Email/PIM do you find to be more stable than Outlook
A power user is an admin who hasn't bothered to make themselves an admin - yet.
From: Stephen Wimberly [riverside...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.
Actually to install FireFox,
Most of my customers are SMBs. I've walked away from a LOT of business over the
years, primarily for the reason you mentioned.
I won't work for a company that refuses to take even the most basic steps to
take care of themselves. They can find someone that charges half my rate and
spends three
IANAL/B/S (lawyer/barrister/soliciter) - and as far as I know, no one else here
is either. I can make some guesses on how I would pursue this, but there is
more information required than you state in your email.
http://microsoft.com/licensing - you'll find telephone numbers for your
locality,
That is PRECISELY why I recommended he called Microsoft Licensing and document
the call.
As long as Microsoft has given you a documentable answer, you are freed from
penalties. That doesn't mean if they change their mind you don't have to
true up, but you've given a reasonable effort to find
I've used ObserveIT and was happy with it.
Obligatory Disclaimer: Because I'm an Exchange MVP I received a free license to
ObserveIT.
From: James Hill [james.h...@superamart.com.au]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
As of Exchange 2007 and above, installing Outlook on an Exchange server _IS_
supported and in some scenarios is actually required.
I can't think of any reason why you should not install Outlook on a DC, other
than a DC should be pristine.
From: Ben Scott
My experience with XServers is several years out of date, but the last time I
got involved in a project using them, the directory was buggy, prone to
crashing, and had to be manually resynchronized with AD at least once a day (or
whenever new users were added, new computers were added, or
By default, the first one that you install in a domain is the license server.
You should be able to point the second one to itself as a license server.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=specify+terminal+services+license+server
:-)
(Couldn't resist.)
From: Eldridge, Dave
That is correct. Using OWA is, in fact, the easiest way to tell which rules are
server-side and which are client-side.
From: Evan Brastow [ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
It's been possible to install DHCP into a Windows Failover Cluster for years.
Windows 2008 R2, due Real Soon Now, also provides multiple-server replication
and failover.
From: Eric E Eskam [ees...@usgs.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:04 PM
To: NT System
Did you install RU8?
There were changes in the backpressure algorithm.
Also, ensure that the disks where all the roles are sitting have AT LEAST 10 GB
free. If you made an install where you have a small C and didn't go through
the process of relocating mail.que and the log files, well, that
didn't windows 2008/iis 7 add native support for sftp?
(goes away and googles)
Oh. It's FTPS not SFTP.
Never mind...
From: Don Kuhlman [drkuhl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Scriptable SFTP
-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scriptable SFTP client for Windows
didn't windows 2008/iis 7 add native support for sftp?
(goes away and googles)
Oh. It's FTPS not SFTP.
Never mind
so, disallow NDRs on the receive connector.
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 07
I have massive amounts of garbage, the queues are filled with undeliverables
SharePoint, like Exchange 2007 and above, care very very little about what is
present in the bindings for the website.
Instead, they execute an extension that links into IIS based on their internal
configuration to decide whether a particular URL applies to them or not.
SharePoint Admin
troll.
From: Boris Elieff [beli...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What does it take to get off this mailing list?
I've been blocking this for years. I would like this email address permanently
removed.
you can manipulate these to whereever/whatever you want. they must be valid,
insofar as DNS is concerned - but exchange doesn't care.
From: Ken Schaefer [...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Oh pshaw.
It's been fine since Vista sp1.
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: [HUMOR] xkcd: Estimation
I suspect today's xkcd comic, titled Estimation, may resonate with
some
That particular bug has been fixed.
It works just fine for email, just as the Outlook Connector does for
Hotmail/Livemail/etc.
But it doesn't provide any collaborative functionality, as far as I can see.
From: Richard Stovall
I was head of IT for a telecom company until sometime in 1999. I can assure you
- if we did NOT have those sky may fall teams to update thousands upon
thousands of lines of COBOL code - the sky would've fallen, at least for that
company.
We found many issues that required addressing.
I doubt
notified me an update was available.
--
Mike Gill
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Google Apps Outlook sync plugin
That particular bug has been fixed.
It works just fine
retarded suit? H...
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote:
I was head of IT for a telecom company until sometime in 1999. I can assure you
- if we did NOT have those sky may fall teams to update thousands upon
As long as they aren't SBS.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 4:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2 Domains on same subnet?
I have a network where I'm doing
Xcacls will do it (although depending on what OS you are running you might want
to download the update from Microsoft downloads).
However, icacls has an easier syntax (which is less powerful but should meet
your needs in this case). Take a look at it.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant
Yes, this is true.
At least as of today - their UCC certificates are LESS than the published price
on GoDaddy.com itself.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent
Diskpart.exe
Select volume 1
Assign letter=Z
Quit
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 5:01 PM
To: NT System Admin
601 - 700 of 3233 matches
Mail list logo
