Re: [Nuke-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2011-07-20 Thread Ron Ganbar
Hi Nand, your invitation doesn't seem to appear in my linkedIn inbox. Also, do we know each other? Can I help in any way? Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ On 20 July 2011 06:05, Nand Kishor

Re: [Nuke-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2011-07-20 Thread Jonathan Skabla
Me neither, and I am not sure we have met too. Please let us know this is not spam -- Sincerely, Jonathan Skabla jonathanska...@gmail.com www.jonathanskabla.com 732-589-8805 ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk,

Re: [Nuke-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2011-07-20 Thread Ron Ganbar
Anyway, very odd to be sending a linkedIn connection email via the Nuke User forum. Probably a mistake. Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ On 20 July 2011 15:19, Jonathan Skabla

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Randy Little
Merry Xmas its fixed. The weird thing is that fixing was to turn off crop to format in the blur11 then turn it back on. ? So I don't know. strange. maybe it was holding onto the format from pre crop some how for whatever reason. set cut_paste_input [stack 0] version 6.2 v3 push

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Randy Little
Oh I also hooked and unhooked a constant at one point. Maybe sparkle needs an input size? Randy S. Little http://www.rslittle.com http://reel.rslittle.com On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 01:12, Randy Little randyslit...@gmail.com wrote: Merry Xmas its fixed. The weird thing is that fixing was to

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Ron Ganbar
Hi Randy, Still wrong on my end... :-( Played with Blur11 - didn't seem to make any difference. Thanks for trying. Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ On 20 July 2011 18:12, Randy Little

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Ron Ganbar
The Constant node doesn't seem to help me either. The problem started with some other image, not the Sparkle. I just used that so I'll have something to post here. Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url:

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Randy Little
did you try hooking and unhooking or leaving hooked a a black constant. Its 2 am I don't know what buttons I pushed to make it work. SORRY. BUT Randy S. Little http://www.rslittle.com http://reel.rslittle.com On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 01:16, Ron Ganbar ron...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Randy,

[Nuke-users] Rons sparkle

2011-07-20 Thread Randy Little
Weird the whole conversation is gone from my gmail. did you say something the chinese didn't like? try this script does it work? Randy S. Little http://www.rslittle.com http://reel.rslittle.com ronstar.nk Description: Binary data ___ Nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Ron Ganbar
Is the gamma (curve) all the way up on 5 and size on 2 and you're not getting a square? Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ On 20 July 2011 18:19, Randy Little randyslit...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Nuke-users] Rons sparkle

2011-07-20 Thread Ron Ganbar
I believe I kept my opinion of the Dalai Lama to myself for once, so I'm surprised. Anyway, In both versions you sent me, if you set the size to 2 and curve to 5, you get that square. Doesn't seem fixed. But thanks for trying. Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Randy Little
Its like the bbox is not resizing even though it shows it bigger right? it was working for a bit but now I can make it work again. I get what looks like the image hitting the bbox that exist if you turn off the crop Randy S. Little http://www.rslittle.com http://reel.rslittle.com On Thu,

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Ivan Busquets
Hi Ron, I think you're hitting a float precision limit there, or rather a limit introduced by the way most (all?) computer graphics software do filtering operations by sampling a square area. But I'll put a big question mark on the second assumption since I don't know the specifics. If you take

Re: [Nuke-users] Rons sparkle

2011-07-20 Thread Randy Little
its not. it worked then it stopped working which usually means my add brain did something and forgot. but see my other mail about the bbox looking like its not being obeyed down the pipe. right? Randy S. Little http://www.rslittle.com http://reel.rslittle.com On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Randy Little
The thing is ivan if you look at it it hits exactly the edge of what the bbox was before the crop. Is that just coincidence? Randy S. Little http://www.rslittle.com http://reel.rslittle.com On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 01:50, Ivan Busquets ivanbusqu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ron, I think you're

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread chris
yeah, strange.. the effect happens actually on any simple blur... looks like the gaussian blur is not really spreading uniformly, but more boxy. boosting the quality level doesn't help either. ironically, if you switch the filter to box it gets more like a circle. also, if i replicate the same

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread chris
got ivan's mail late, but i think he's spot on.. you can try with bigger bbox and ridiculous high quality level and it still is the same problem. if you really need such a high gamma, you could try blurring the image at different rotation, then rotate back. something like: set cut_paste_input

Re: [Nuke-users] Odd gamma behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Ivan Busquets
Actually, I think the reason it looks correct in 8 and 16 bit is because values hit 0 before they reach the edge of the square sampled area. Which would be the same as clamping some of the very low end in a float image. The problem is, in the case of a radial gradient like this one, that the

Re: [Nuke-users] Local File Auto-Cache Path

2011-07-20 Thread Frank Rueter
you should send feature requests like this to support rather than the mailing list ;) On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Steffen Dünner wrote: Hi! Just a quick question: is it possible to either enter multiple directories in the preferences' local file auto-cache path OR to at least make this

Re: [Nuke-users] Using 3D Connexion SP in Nuke

2011-07-20 Thread to...@elitevfx.com
Wow, sounds...intense..! Will stick to *not* use it then, lol. Thanks though Deke! Cheers! / Tobey 2011/7/8 Deke Kincaid dekekinc...@gmail.com Last I knew the 3d connexion can't simply be assigned to arbitrary key/mouse strokes. Instead you have to specially write support for your