Re: [Nuke-users] Same operation on multiple inputs

2011-11-22 Thread Thomas Volkmann
Thanks Holger, exactly what we've been looking for... Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:22:31 +0100 Von: Holger Hummel|Celluloid VFX hol...@celluloid-vfx.com An: Nuke user discussion nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk Betreff: Re: [Nuke-users] Same operation

Re: [Nuke-users] Same operation on multiple inputs

2011-11-22 Thread Howard Jones
I saw that but couldn't see the difference between copy cloning some nodes and using a multipaste tool (mines from Diogo). Seemed a long way around to do the same thing. I'll let Diogo share this code if he wants.   Howard From: Thomas Volkmann

Re: [Nuke-users] ??? redguard1.glow ???

2011-11-22 Thread Howard Jones
Hi I'm not sure this gets to the nut of another issue where the channels get upset, but on a related gizmo contamination question could anyone confirm if they have this in Frank's edgeExtend?  Blur {   channels {rgba.red rgba.green rgba.blue rgba.alpha} instead of   Blur {   channels rgba

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke - 3d Tracking integration

2011-11-22 Thread Peter Hartwig
PFTrack all the way! On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Siva Sankar shiv.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, which 3d tracking software can integrate well in nuke?? Boujou, Syntheyes or anyother?? usually we used to track in boujou and importing it into nuke, the problem is I am not able to

AW: [Nuke-users] Nuke - 3d Tracking integration

2011-11-22 Thread Thorsten Kaufmann
Syntheyes works great too. And you could of course use the build in tracker in NukeX Thorsten Kaufmann Head of Production MACKEVISION Medien Design GmbH, Stuttgart Forststrasse 7 70174 Stuttgart Tel: +49 (0) 711-933048-0 Fax: +49 (0) 711-933048-90

Re: [Nuke-users] Same operation on multiple inputs

2011-11-22 Thread Diogo Girondi
Hi Howard, I don't know which code you're talking about but feel free to share as you please :) cheers, diogo On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Howard Jones mrhowardjo...@yahoo.comwrote: I saw that but couldn't see the difference between copy cloning some nodes and using a multipaste tool

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke - 3d Tracking integration

2011-11-22 Thread Deke Kincaid
You should be able to turn on point selection in the upper right corner of the viewer and then snap cards to those points that way. -deke On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 05:30, Siva Sankar shiv.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, which 3d tracking software can integrate well in nuke?? Boujou,

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke - 3d Tracking integration

2011-11-22 Thread James Etherington
3D Equalizer is very good and you can always export your .fbx with a camera and geo (card or cube or whatever to use as line up) On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Deke Kincaid dekekinc...@gmail.com wrote: You should be able to turn on point selection in the upper right corner of the viewer and

RE: [Nuke-users] Nuke - 3d Tracking integration

2011-11-22 Thread Mahesh Kumar
hi shivakumar pftrack and syntheyes is very good for nuke ... thanks Mahesh Kumar.BSr.Compositor UNIFI MEDIA STUDIOS From: dekekinc...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:11:20 -0800 Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke - 3d Tracking integration To: nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk You should be

[Nuke-users] gizmo from sparkle node

2011-11-22 Thread mylo
Hi i have a question i would like to make a Gizmo out of the sparkle node in nuke.But just two parameters ( chromatic aboration and shift ) to use this as a filter. the problem is, that this is a image genarator. i always have the sparkle on the top of the picture. can i just extract these two

Re: [Nuke-users] nuke camera to LW

2011-11-22 Thread Frank Rueter
Cameras in Nuke don't have a resolution On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:33 AM, JKehler wrote: Hi all. I want to output my nuke camera to Lightwave. I have tried outputting via a write geo node and exporting an .fbx, however the resulting camera in LW has a 640x480 resolution while my nuke

Re: [Nuke-users] shared toolsets

2011-11-22 Thread Paul Raeburn
Hi Peter, I would think that if there was an existing sub-dir in the NUKE path then it would be available to all users, but if the user had their own identically named sub-dir then it would come up as [user] . Meaning that you would respect the NUKE_PATH order of loading as to where was

Re: [Nuke-users] shared toolsets

2011-11-22 Thread Ben Roberts
hi guys, that would certainly suite our workflow too. we are manually copying these to a global location, but the way paul describes the idea seems pretty solid for the way we would see it working too ... ben On 23/11/11 14:35, Paul Raeburn wrote: Hi Peter, I would think that if there was