Re: [Nuke-users] PostageStamps - not moving upstream inputs

2015-04-14 Thread Frank Harrison
Hey guys, Yes I can see that's annoying and pending getting sign-off from our product designer I think I have a fix. One question, if inputs are hidden, do you want to *always* ignore upstream Nodes when CTRL+Dragging? For example another user does wants to see (not move) all Nodes

Re: [Nuke-users] PostageStamps - not moving upstream inputs

2015-04-14 Thread Yahoo
There are plenty of times I would want upstream nodes inc postage stamps' branches selected. In fact I'm not sure when I wouldn't. Mind you I use me own rolled version to select above, below, left and right (connected or all but not 'upstream') which would cover that scenario.(on nukepedia)

Re: [Nuke-users] ;-)

2015-04-14 Thread Ron Ganbar
Am I missing something? Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Gustaf Nilsson gus...@laserpanda.com wrote: set cut_paste_input [stack 0] version 8.0 v5

Re: [Nuke-users] ;-)

2015-04-14 Thread Martin Constable
Dodgy lines across the wheel when the mix luminance is activated and set to 1? On 14 Apr 2015, at 7:39 pm, Ron Ganbar ron...@gmail.com wrote: Am I missing something? Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url:

Re: [Nuke-users] ;-)

2015-04-14 Thread Ron Ganbar
Oh yeah. Only happens to me when the slider is not at 1 or 0 - but anything in between. Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Martin Constable

Re: [Nuke-users] ;-)

2015-04-14 Thread Martin Constable
Another funny thing: the entry for 'mix luminance’ is missing from the help page for that node, but present in most other node help pages. Also… it gets super grotty if you raise the value above 1 (e.g. 1000) On 14 Apr 2015, at 7:45 pm, Ron Ganbar ron...@gmail.com wrote: Oh yeah. Only

[Nuke-users] ;-)

2015-04-14 Thread Gustaf Nilsson
set cut_paste_input [stack 0] version 8.0 v5 ColorWheel { inputs 0 gamma 0.45 name ColorWheel1 selected true xpos 347 ypos -130 } Expression { expr1 g mix_luminance 1 name Expression7 selected true xpos 347 ypos -9 } -- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

[Nuke-users] motion vectors output spherical projection Nuke

2015-04-14 Thread Pat Wong
Hi I have a moving object n a scene which i want to output as a spherical map in the scanline render. however the motion vector pass seems to be screwy... NOT useable a t all, has Inf values if any at all. Has anybody encountered this. Or have a work around for this? I ideally would liek to use

Re: [Nuke-users] motion vectors output spherical projection Nuke

2015-04-14 Thread Ron Ganbar
You can output 6 regular 90 degrees cameras and connect them up with a spherical transform. Ron Ganbar email: ron...@gmail.com tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Pat Wong patwon...@gmail.com

Re: [Nuke-users] motion vectors output spherical projection Nuke

2015-04-14 Thread Pat Wong
Im not sure that would that match up to the same output as the spherical map in the scanline renderer... Kind Regards Patrick Wong 077961 35224 www.wahwahdigital.com On 14 April 2015 at 18:06, Ron Ganbar ron...@gmail.com wrote: You can output 6 regular 90 degrees cameras and connect them

[Nuke-users] still frames

2015-04-14 Thread godan urdaga
can anybody help me on how to export still frames from nuke studio? thanx ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] PostageStamps - not moving upstream inputs

2015-04-14 Thread Frank Rueter|OHUfx
sure would be nice. guess somebody should request it again to bump the priority On 14/04/15 2:28 pm, Aurélyen Daudet wrote: Hi there, I'm agree with the idea of just adding a new feature, something like Ctrl + Shift + Click, to ignore hidden inputs upstream. And keep what people are used

Re: [Nuke-users] motion vectors output spherical projection Nuke

2015-04-14 Thread Elias Ericsson Rydberg
A six pack of 90 degree cameras will give you the same output as a spherical camera. It's just breaking it up into six intermediate steps. Den 14 apr 2015 19:26 skrev Pat Wong patwon...@gmail.com: Im not sure that would that match up to the same output as the spherical map in the scanline

Re: [Nuke-users] PostageStamps - not moving upstream inputs

2015-04-14 Thread Frank Harrison
Hey Howard, On 14 April 2015 at 09:05, Yahoo mrhowardjo...@yahoo.com wrote: There are plenty of times I would want upstream nodes inc postage stamps' branches selected. In fact I'm not sure when I wouldn't. Even when the hide inputs Node option is set? Also If you're changing the code

Re: [Nuke-users] PostageStamps - not moving upstream inputs

2015-04-14 Thread Sean Falcon
Hi Frank, I would not want to always ignore the inputs. Would it be possible to add another modifier key to ignore inputs? Like Ctl + drag moves the inputs and something like shift+ctl drag ignores any hidden inputs while dragging? Both functions are very useful, so a quick additional key

[Nuke-users] Re-order favorites in pop up menus?

2015-04-14 Thread Nick Guth
Is there a way to re-order the favorites items in the left hand column? I can't figure out how without deleting and re-adding them. Thanks! ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/

Re: [Nuke-users] ;-)

2015-04-14 Thread Gustaf Nilsson
also fixed if you just put r in the red and b in the blue On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Martin Constable jackyoungbl...@me.com wrote: Another funny thing: the entry for 'mix luminance’ is missing from the help page for that node, but present in most other node help pages. Also… it gets

Re: [Nuke-users] PostageStamps - not moving upstream inputs

2015-04-14 Thread Aurélyen Daudet
Hi there, I'm agree with the idea of just adding a new feature, something like Ctrl + Shift + Click, to ignore hidden inputs upstream. And keep what people are used to, Ctrl + Click to select all upstream nodes, including hidden inputs. I think I would have needed this feature only a very few