Re: [Nuke-users] Hide Transform overlay inside a gizmo

Dear Darrenjust a little nicer nowscript attached Kind Regards-adam burnIn_slate_v003.nk Description: Binary data On 10 Feb 2017, at 9:19 AM, Darren Coombes wrote:Cheers, thanks Adam. Will check it out.. Check out some of my work…www.vimeo.com/darrencoombes/reel2017Mob:  

Re: [Nuke-users] bokeh usage

Yes, and even if you have the additional bg samples behind your defocused foreground bokeh is not using them. Am 09.02.2017 um 19:04 schrieb Nathan Rusch: This isn't too surprising. Your original deep data has discrete color samples for each deep sample in places where objects overlap, but

Re: [Nuke-users] Hide Transform overlay inside a gizmo

Cheers, thanks Adam. Will check it out.. Check out some of my work… www.vimeo.com/darrencoombes/reel2017 Mob: +61 418 631 079 IMDB: www.imdb.com/name/nm3719099/ Instagram: @7secondstoblack Instagram: @durwood0781 Skype:

Re: [Nuke-users] bokeh usage

I've seen ppl fixing the halo by extending the edges first. Hacky, but works... Gabor On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Gabor L. Toth wrote: > Hi Nathan, thanks for the clarification! But then what is the preferred > workflow with this plugin? I assume many companies are using

Re: [Nuke-users] bokeh usage

Hi Nathan, thanks for the clarification! But then what is the preferred workflow with this plugin? I assume many companies are using with deep input. We can't keep the comping fully in deep until the defocus node, we are putting together the passes before, with all kind of color corrections and

Re: [Nuke-users] bokeh usage

This isn't too surprising. Your original deep data has discrete color samples for each deep sample in places where objects overlap, but your flattened color data has no "samples" to speak of. Thus, when you apply your DeepRecolor, Nuke has to basically take each pixel and spread its value out

[Nuke-users] "Other" Preference tab greyed out

I have a few tabs in the “other” section in the nuke preferences and they are all greyed out. Anyone knows what it’s due to? Permissions on my .nuke directory seems fine. Thanks___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk,

Re: [Nuke-users] bokeh usage

Hm, used to work for me so far. The only thing that comes to my mind is that the two are not lining up perfectly before the recolor. Maybe different formats due to overscan rendering? "Gabor L. Toth" wrote: >Hi, thanks for your reply! Unfortunately I tried it already, but

Re: [Nuke-users] bokeh usage

Hi, do you have the 'target input alpha' checkbox on the DeepRecolor node checked? Turning this option on might solve your problem. Kind regards, Michael "Gabor L. Toth" wrote: >Hi, > >we are testing peregrine's bokeh in our pipeline. I would like to use >deep >input for

[Nuke-users] bokeh usage

Hi, we are testing peregrine's bokeh in our pipeline. I would like to use deep input for perfect defocus. With connecting the original deep read to the node's deep input it works perfectly indeed. But when I do a deep recolor, putting the comped rgba data to deep branch, it produces a little halo