RE: Re: [Nuke-users] LogC again

2011-08-20 Thread Adrian Baltowski
Always when you mean about movs from Alexa remember that in Nuke 6.2 and 6.3 there is no actual 'raw' functionality in movReader. In older versions of Nuke (up to 6.1 32bit) when you activate raw button, movReader get values from Quictime's PixelBuffer and copy them directly, without any

Re: [SPAM] Re: [Nuke-users] LogC again

2011-08-19 Thread Kevin Wheatley
Gary Jaeger wrote: I see that the read node still clamps values when doing colorspace transforms. Why is that? Technical limitation or bug? If your talking about clipping at 0.0, this is a feature of the DD::Image::LUT class, I assume the read/write nodes use this to do the conversions. If

Re: [SPAM] Re: [Nuke-users] LogC again

2011-08-19 Thread Jonathan Egstad
If your talking about clipping at 0.0, this is a feature of the DD::Image::LUT class, I assume the read/write nodes use this to do the conversions. If there was a way to work around this it would be good as quite a few log-lin conversions map 0.0 linear to a negative value, clipping them

Re: [Nuke-users] LogC again

2011-08-18 Thread Gary Jaeger
By the way this could have been avoided if I weren't in the habit of using colorspace nodes instead of changing the read node. I see that the read node still clamps values when doing colorspace transforms. Why is that? Technical limitation or bug? . . . . . . . . . . . . Gary Jaeger // Core

Re: [Nuke-users] LogC again

2011-08-16 Thread Francois Lord
I mean, it looks like your viewer is set to linear. On 16/08/2011 15:32, Francois Lord wrote: Is your viewer set to sRGB/REC709? I took your image and applied a colorspace conversion from linear to REC709 only on the Nuke part of it. Both images became nearly identical. On 16/08/2011 13:10,

Re: [Nuke-users] LogC again

2011-08-16 Thread Gary Jaeger
Viewer lut is set. Tried both sRGB and Rec709. I've already set the LogC footage to AlexsaLogC. So I have a Colorspace node in AlexaV3LogC, out Linear. So in your case that would be AlexaLogC Linear, then Linear Rec709, then viewing in Rec709? Isn't that doubling up the Rec709 part since you're