Re: [Numpy-discussion] float32 is not a float ?

2008-04-11 Thread Anne Archibald
On 10/04/2008, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you want the isreal function, but it will also return true for complex with 0 imaginary part. Hmm... the various iswhatever functions seem to be lacking in coverage. Maybe we should fix that. icomplexobj is designed to solve

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making NumPy accessible to everyone (or no-one) (was Numpy-discussion Digest, Vol 19, Issue 44)

2008-04-11 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Lou Pecora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I use np= number of points, too. But you all might want to use something else. That's the point of the flexibility of import ... as I would recommend against using np as a variable name. Variable names should be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] vander() docstring

2008-04-11 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Freitag 11 April 2008, Robert Kern wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out it matches the matlab definition. Maybe we just need another function: vandermonde -1 It's needless duplication. Agree. Let's just live with Matlab's

Re: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY future

2008-04-11 Thread Fernando Perez
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pearu Peterson wrote: Use Google Code. Pros: it provides necessary infrastructure to develop software projects and I am used to it. Cons: in my experience Google Code has been too many times broken (at least three

Re: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY future

2008-04-11 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:48:21AM -0700, Andrew Straw wrote: Another option: the IPython people have been using launchpad.net ( https://launchpad.net/ipython ) -- it supports bzr. I'm not sure how happy they are with it, but I think happy enough to stick with it rather than attempt to get