And, additionally setting the environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
start with /data/home/u0038151/lib instead of ending with it, it picks
up my own gsl, and gives the error message
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dot2 $ python -c import dot
Traceback (most recent call last):
File string, line 1, in
# dot extension module
_test = Extension(_test,
[test_wrap.c,
test.c],
include_dirs = [numpy_include,'/data/home/
u0038151/include'],
library_dirs = ['/data/home/u0038151/lib']
)
#
Frank Lagor wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I previously had a problem with installing numpy on a cluster of mine,
but it seemed to be resolved. The installation was successful and the
numpy code ran well. Unfortunately, this was not the case when I
tried to run parallel code. The other processors
Giovanni Samaey wrote:
changing the library path and explicitly adding libraries =['gsl',
'gslcblas'] did the trick !
one other suggestion:
if you want this to run any other machine, you might want to build gsl
as a static lib, so it will get linked directly into your extension, and
your
Hi Everyone,
I previously had a problem with installing numpy on a cluster of mine, but
it seemed to be resolved. The installation was successful and the numpy code
ran well. Unfortunately, this was not the case when I tried to run parallel
code. The other processors have difficulty finding a
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:07 PM, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Lagor wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I previously had a problem with installing numpy on a cluster of mine,
but it seemed to be resolved. The installation was successful and the
numpy code ran well. Unfortunately,
Hi,
I've translated it on my blog (http://matt.eifelle.com/) and published
it this morning.
Matthieu
2008/10/30 Anthony Floyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Chris,
Matthieu Brucher wrote:
If you can
follow a French tutorial, you can go on
Thanks,
changing the library path and explicitly adding libraries =['gsl',
'gslcblas'] did the trick !
Thank you so much !
Giovanni
On 04 Nov 2008, at 12:09, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
The issue with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH would come up in any case. You have
to put your gsl library folder before
Matthieu Brucher wrote:
I've translated it on my blog (http://matt.eifelle.com/) and published
it this morning.
Thanks, that's a very helpful article!
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/ORR(206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand
Hi Matthieu,
thank you for your prompt reply.
On 04 Nov 2008, at 11:24, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
# dot extension module
_test = Extension(_test,
[test_wrap.c,
test.c],
include_dirs = [numpy_include,'/data/home/
u0038151/include'],
Dear all,
I am unsure about the correct place to put this question -- If this
isn't the correct list, please let me know which place is more
appropriate.
I am trying to build an extension module in python that calls a C
routine that depends on the GNU Scientific Library.
I am using swig to
The issue with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH would come up in any case. You have
to put your gsl library folder before the system one if you want your
gsl library to be used.
For the cblas issue, it seems from Google you have to link against a
CBLAS library as well to use the GSL (for instance blas or
T J [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/04/08 12:59 AM
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:46 AM, T J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since these are all in the standard locations, I am building without a
site.cfg. Here is the beginning info:
Apparently, this is not enough. Only if I also set the ATLAS
environment
Hi everyone,
thanks for all the feedback. Last call on this one. If nobody
objects to the language that's written here:
https://cirl.berkeley.edu/fperez/static/numpy-pep225/
in a couple of days I'll toss this over to python-dev. At that point
it will be up to Guido and that team to decide
Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi everyone,
thanks for all the feedback. Last call on this one. If nobody
objects to the language that's written here:
https://cirl.berkeley.edu/fperez/static/numpy-pep225/
one small typo: in the Why just go one step? section, you have the phrase:
and it is
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one small typo: in the Why just go one step? section, you have the phrase:
and it is thus wortwhile solving the general problem
wortwhile should be worthwhile.
Thanks, fixed.
I've posted a message about this to sage-devel, as they
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding some new ufuncs. Some possibilities are
- expadd(a,b) = exp(a) + exp(b) -- For numbers stored as logs:
- absdiff(a,b) = abs(a - b) -- Useful for forming norms
- absmax(a,b) = max(abs(a), abs(b))
- absadd(a,b) = abs(a) + abs(b) -- Useful for L_1 norm and
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
2008/11/5 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding some new ufuncs. Some possibilities are
expadd(a,b) = exp(a) + exp(b) -- For numbers stored as logs:
Surely this should be
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/5 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding some new ufuncs. Some possibilities are
expadd(a,b) = exp(a) + exp(b) -- For numbers stored as logs:
Surely this should be
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:05 PM, T J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/5 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding some new ufuncs. Some possibilities are
expadd(a,b) = exp(a) + exp(b) --
On 05/11/2008, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:05 PM, T J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/5 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of adding some
Charles R Harris wrote:
Hmm... but I'm thinking one has to be clever here because the main
reason I heard for using logs was that normal floating point numbers
had insufficient range. So maybe something like
logadd(a,b) = a + log(1 + exp(b - a))
where a b ?
Yes, that's the idea. AFAIK,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 05/11/2008, Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:05 PM, T J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/5
23 matches
Mail list logo
