On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> > Right now we are trying to balance difficult things: stable releases
> with experimental development.
>
> Perhaps a more formal "development release" system could help here.
> II
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
> the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised that no one
> has objected already. What would a fork solve? To paraphrase the
> regexp saying: after for
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> That is an excellent thought.
>
> We could make the odd numbered releases "experimental" and the even-numbered
> as stable.
>
> That makes some sense. What do others think?
I think the concern with that is manpower: it effectively requ
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> I'm starting to think that a fork might be the best solution to the present
> problem.
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised that no one
has objecte
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ralf Gommers <
>> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Cha
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> That is an excellent thought.
>
> We could make the odd numbered releases "experimental" and the
> even-numbered as stable.
>
> That makes some sense.What do others think?
>
>
I'm starting to think that a fork might be the best solution
That is an excellent thought.
We could make the odd numbered releases "experimental" and the even-numbered as
stable.
That makes some sense.What do others think?
-Travis
On Apr 23, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> Righ
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Right now we are trying to balance difficult things: stable releases with
> experimental development.
Perhaps a more formal "development release" system could help here.
IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things: the latest release (and pas
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>>> Linux: Technically, everything you say is true. In practice, good luck
>>> convincing Linus or a subsystem maintainer to accept your patch when
>>> other people are raising substantive complaints. Here's an email I
>>> googled up
Thank you very much for contributing this description.It is very helpful to
see how people use numpy.ma in the wild.
-Travis
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
> Travis et al,
>
> This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
> if there is a better thr
>
>> Linux: Technically, everything you say is true. In practice, good luck
>> convincing Linus or a subsystem maintainer to accept your patch when
>> other people are raising substantive complaints. Here's an email I
>> googled up in a few moments, in which Linus yells at people for trying
>> to
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
> Travis et al,
>
> This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
> if there is a better thread or place to share this information. I've
> been meaning to participate in the discussion for a long time and
> never
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
> >> master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 relea
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Right, this part is specifically about ABI compatibility, not API
>> compatibility -- segfaults would only occur for extension libraries
>> that were compiled against one version of
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Right, this part is specifically about ABI compatibility, not API
> compatibility -- segfaults would only occur for extension libraries
> that were compiled against one version of numpy and then used with a
> different version.
Which make
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
>> master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
>> is, we don't actually have cons
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>> Linux is Linus' private tree. Everything that goes in is his decision,
>> everything that stays out is his decision. Of course, he delegates much of
>> the work to people
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:42 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
> >> >>
> >>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word "consensus"
>> come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
>> dissolved itself in favor of g
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
>> >>
>> >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
> >>
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib
> >> promises a list of functions that does not app
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word "consensus"
> come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
> dissolved itself in favor of governance "directly by the consensus of
> the people active in gl
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Dave Fugate wrote:
> Thanks Ralf! I'm interested in unattended/silent installations.
>
>
I'm afraid that that doesn't work. NSIS installers provide the /S option
for silent installs, but it requires some changes to the install script
that we apparently didn't mak
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
> master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
> is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to
> give our users what they wa
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ralf Gommers <
> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ral
Thanks Ralf! I'm interested in unattended/silent installations.
My best,
Dave
---
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:48:36 +0200
From: Ralf Gommers
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Command-line options for (Windows)
NumPy Installer?
To: Discussio
26 matches
Mail list logo
