So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
On 29 Jun 2013 05:03, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
It looks like we've gotten a bit confused and need to untangle
something. There's a PR to add new functions
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
full and filledwith and filled_with all seem OK to me.
On a meta note - anything we can do to stop threads petering off? It
seems to happen rather often,
Cheers,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
full and filledwith and filled_with all seem OK to me.
same here, filled_with_like might
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
How about `np.inited` ? `full` doesn't sound quite right to me. Although I
expect once it comes into use everyone will get used to it.
snip
Chuck
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
How about `np.inited` ? `full` doesn't sound quite right to me. Although I
expect
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
No objection.
On 6/29/2013 3:00 PM, Nathaniel wrote:
any objections to np.full?
Still curious:
why isn't ``tile`` the right name?
(It already exists.)
import numpy as np
np.tile(3.0, (2,3))
array([[ 3., 3., 3.],
[ 3., 3., 3.]])
If someone explained this, sorry to
have missed it.
Alan
On 6/29/2013 3:00 PM, Nathaniel wrote:
any objections to np.full?
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
Still curious:
why isn't ``tile`` the right name?
(It already exists.)
import numpy as np
np.tile(3.0, (2,3))
array([[ 3., 3., 3.],
[ 3., 3., 3.]])
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/29/2013 3:00 PM, Nathaniel wrote:
any objections to np.full?
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
Still curious:
why isn't ``tile`` the right name?
(It already exists.)
import numpy as
and I don't see the problem with ``tile_like``.
On 6/29/2013 6:15 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
It makes no sense except in the scalar case.
I would think it makes sense in every case that
can be normally broadcast to the shape of the
paradigm array.
Anyway, I drop the suggestion.
Cheers,
Alan
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
