Hi All,
I'm thinking of making the 1.8.x branch next Sunday. Any complaints,
thoughts?
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking of making the 1.8.x branch next Sunday. Any complaints, thoughts?
Thanks, Chuck. Are there any specific PRs up for review that should
be incorporated into 1.8?
Stéfan
I don't see any that *have* to go in, but there are a few that could be
included. The most significant is probably the inplace fancy indexing if it
is ready. The nanmean etc. functions are not committed yet, but I think
they are ready. If the Polynomial import fixes show up, they can go in.
There
I would like to have the ufunc overrides in 1.8 if it is possible.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't see any that *have* to go in, but there are a few that could be
included. The most significant is probably the inplace fancy indexing
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Blake Griffith blake.a.griff...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would like to have the ufunc overrides in 1.8 if it is possible.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see any that *have* to go in, but there are a
I think it is nearly complete. Although there are some recent changes that
need review.
I still need to go back and make changes to the original NEP noting the
differences in final implementation.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of making the 1.8.x branch next Sunday. Any complaints,
thoughts?
First thought: thanks a lot for doing this.
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of making the 1.8.x branch next Sunday. Any complaints,
thoughts?
First thought: thanks a lot for
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm thinking of making the
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand the discussion on timezones in
datetime64, but I have the impression that those who do think it needs
an urgent decision and some action for the short term. Is that right,
datetimers?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris B - are you the point man on this one? What do you think?
Only the point man in the sense that I'm poking at people to try to
get what I want ;-)
But see my other note.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand the discussion on timezones in
datetime64, but I have the impression that those who do
15 matches
Mail list logo