Hi everyone,
I'm excited to announce the v0.2 release of Bokeh, an interactive web
plotting library for Python. The long-term vision for Bokeh is to
provide rich interactivity, using the full power of Javascript and
Canvas, to Python users who don't need to write any JS or learn
the DOM.
The ful
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> I'd be tempted to replace that unreadable link with
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/scipy/ and not care about
> pip/easy_install scanning that page. Binary installers don't work anyway and
> source bundles are on pypi already, s
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:34 PM, wrote:
> My first stop is always pypi to find the link to binaries.
>
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scipy
> however the direct download link points to 0.11
>
Grrr. IIRC that's because you have to link a page on SF which has the
actual binaries, and that link ha
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 23.10.2013 23:24, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti:
> > 23.10.2013 22:50, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
> > [clip]
> >> This makes me think: apparently there is an offical "scipy stack" --
> >> and I even found it with a quick google:
> >>
> >> http://w
My first stop is always pypi to find the link to binaries.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scipy
however the direct download link points to 0.11
Josef
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy
Folks,
After some more discussion here and on the pull request I submitted
earlier, here is anew pull request -- I think conforms to what folks
suggested, but still makes it a lot easier for folks to find the
stand-alone installers if that's what they are looking for.
https://github.com/scipy/sci
23.10.2013 23:24, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti:
> 23.10.2013 22:50, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> This makes me think: apparently there is an offical "scipy stack" --
>> and I even found it with a quick google:
>>
>> http://www.scipy.org/stackspec.html
>
> If you click "More information..." on t
23.10.2013 22:50, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
[clip]
> This makes me think: apparently there is an offical "scipy stack" --
> and I even found it with a quick google:
>
> http://www.scipy.org/stackspec.html
If you click "More information..." on the front page, or "About Scipy"
in the sidebar, it take
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> I am arguing that whether it's a good idea or not, according to us, is
> not going affect the guys and gals in Group 2, and that, unless we
> want to lose or discourage those people, we'll always need to support
> (and give mind- and page-s
I have a question about numpy profiling. When I run my script with -m
cProfile I see timings for lots of functions, but not for some like
np.exp(). How do I see these timings? I don't want to have to work around
it by writing a lot of functions like def mynumpyexp(A): return np.exp(A).
_
23.10.2013 21:06, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti:
> 23.10.2013 17:51, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> But it sounds like the real problem is with the surrounding
>> pages--that's the page you find when you try to figure out how to get
>> numpy--if that page is about the stack, it shoul
In Clawpack, we use numpy.distutils to handle compilation and wrapping of
Fortran source files via f2py. This generates a huge amount of output
(warnings generated by f2py in intermediate steps) that (it seems) can
safely be ignored. However, it's problematic to have pages of warnings fly
by when
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 23.10.2013 20:10, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> There's no need to prefer one group over the other - we just need to
>> make sure that both groups have instructions and binaries they can
>> recognize as being for their case. As
23.10.2013 17:51, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal kirjoitti:
[clip]
> But it sounds like the real problem is with the surrounding
> pages--that's the page you find when you try to figure out how to get
> numpy--if that page is about the stack, it should not be linked to
> directly from the numpy.org pa
23.10.2013 20:10, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
[clip]
> There's no need to prefer one group over the other - we just need to
> make sure that both groups have instructions and binaries they can
> recognize as being for their case. As in:
>
> (Group 1): The easiest way to get
> (Group 2): You can
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:16 AM, jim vickroy wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 8:51 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
>
> Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> but the layout of that page is on
> purpose. scipy.org is split into two parts: (a) a SciPy Stack part, and
> (b)
> a numpy & scipy library part. You'r
On 10/23/2013 8:51 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
Ralf Gommers wrote:
but the layout of that page is on
purpose. scipy.org is split into two parts: (a) a SciPy Stack part, and
(b)
a numpy & scipy library part. You're looking at the stack part, and the
preferred method to install that
Ralf Gommers wrote:
but the layout of that page is on
purpose. scipy.org is split into two parts: (a) a SciPy Stack part, and
(b)
a numpy & scipy library part. You're looking at the stack part, and the
preferred method to install that stack is a Python distribution.
OK,
18 matches
Mail list logo
