On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Sankarshan Mudkavi
smudk...@uwaterloo.cawrote:
Yes 2) is indeed what I was suggesting. My apologies for being unclear, I
was unsure of how much detail and technical information I should include in
the proposal.
well, you need to put enough in that it's clear
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Alexander Belopolsky ndar...@mac.comwrote:
I recall that it was at some point suggested that epoch be part of dtype.
I was not able to find the reasons for a rejection,
I don't think it was rejected, it just wasn't adopted by anyone to write a
NEP and write
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Alexander Belopolsky ndar...@mac.comwrote:
The difference comes down to I/O.
It is more than I/O. It is also about interoperability with Python's
datetime module.
Sorry -- I was using I/O to mean converting to/from datetime64 and other
types So that
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
But this brings up a good point -- having time zone handling fully
compatible ith datetime.datetime would have its advantages.
I don't know if everyone is aware of this, but Python stdlib has support
for fixed-offset
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
* I think there are more or less three options:
1) a) don't have any timezone handling at all -- all datetime64s are UTC.
Always
b) don't have any timezone handling at all -- all datetime64s are
naive
The documentation of numpy.unique
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.unique.html
does not seem to promise that return_index=True will always index the
*first* occurrence of each unique item, which I believe is the current behavior.
A promise would be nice.
Is it intended?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:49 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.comwrote:
The documentation of numpy.unique
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:49 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Alan G Isaac
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:49 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Charles R Harris
