On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Joe Kington joferking...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've recently put together a pull request that adds an `axis` kwarg to
`numpy.unique` so that `unique`can easily be used to find unique
rows/columns/sub-arrays/etc of a larger array.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Cera, Tim t...@cerazone.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Juan Luis Cano juanlu...@gmail.com
wrote:
As now master is open for 1.9, following the discussion opened here
I think a H is feature creep and too specialized
What's .H of a int a str a bool ?
It's just .T and a view, so you cannot rely that conj() makes a copy
if you don't work with complex.
.T is just a reshape function and has **nothing** to do with matrix algebra.
x = np.arange(12).reshape(3,4)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
...
There's lots of uses for A.H to be a conjugating-view, e.g., np.dot(A.H,
A) can be done on-the-fly by BLAS at no extra cost, and so on. These are
currently not possible with pure NumPy without a copy,
python 3.3
I have a bug because we have a check for a .data attribute, that is
not supposed to be available for a string.
(Pdb) dir(data)
['T', '__abs__', '__add__', '__and__', '__array__',
'__array_interface__', '__array_priority__', '__array_struct__',
'__array_wrap__', '__bool__',
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
23.07.2013 19:22, Charles R Harris kirjoitti:
[clip]
Grepping in my code, I find a lot of things like
dfx = van.dot((ax2 - ax1).flat)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 07/23/2013 07:53 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
I'm trying to understand the state of this discussion.
I believe that propoents of adding a .H attribute have
primarily emphasized
- readability (and general
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:14 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 13:52 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try to summarize. To begin with, the environment of the nan functions
is rather special.
1) if the array is of not of inexact type,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try to summarize. To begin with, the environment of the nan functions
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:44 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
I can see where you are getting at, but I would have to disagree. First of
all, when a comparison between two mis-shaped arrays occur, you get back a
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
I also don't like that idea, but I'm not able to come to a good reasoning
like Benjamin.
I don't see advantage to this change and the reason isn't good enough to
justify breaking the interface I think.
But I don't
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 8:01 PM, David Schaich dascha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I recently adopted python, and am in the process of replacing my old
analysis tools. For simple (e.g., linear) interpolations and
extrapolations, in the past I used gnuplot. Today I set up the
equivalent with
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
full and filledwith and filled_with all seem OK to me.
same here, filled_with_like might
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
How about `np.inited` ? `full` doesn't sound quite right to me. Although I
expect
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
It looks like we've gotten a bit confused and need to untangle
something. There's a PR to add new functions 'np.filled' and
'np.filled_like':
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2875
And there was a discussion
Is there a change in the behavior of boolean slicing in current master?
If not I have to find another candidate in numpy master.
(py27d) E:\Josef\testing\tox\py27d\Scriptspython
Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 18:30:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Type help, copyright, credits or
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:30 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a change in the behavior of boolean slicing in current master?
Yes, but I think this is probably a bug in statsmodel. I would expect
you
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 12:52 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:30 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/13 10:36 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas
aldcr...@head.cfa.harvard.edu mailto:aldcr...@head.cfa.harvard.edu
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Eric Firing
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 12/06/2013 14:29, Robert Kern wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
There where the additional proposal (mostly neglected on the original
thread) to add the 'fill'
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 7:31 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 08:52 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything to require a numpy array with a minimum numeric dtype?
To avoid lower
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Moroney, Catherine M (398D)
catherine.m.moro...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hello,
I've got two arrays of the same shape that I read in from a file, and I'm
trying to
difference them. Very simple stuff, but I'm getting weird answers.
Here is the code:
counts1 =
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Moroney, Catherine M (398D)
catherine.m.moro...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I thought it must be something simple like that. When I
convert
the arrays to numpy.int32 things behave normally.
Another question though: a numpy.all() on the
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:19 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05/29/2013 06:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Question about namespace
why is there bool and bool_ ?
np.bool(True) + np.bool(True)
2
np.bool_(True) + np.bool_(True)
True
type(np.bool(True))
type 'bool'
type(np.bool_(True))
type 'numpy.bool_'
I didn't pay attention to the trailing underline in Pauli's original example
Josef
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 00:48 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 7 Jun 2013 21:58, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting observation, (while lurking on a pull request)
np.add.reduce(np.arange(5)3)
3
Is there anything to require a numpy array with a minimum numeric dtype?
To avoid lower precision calculations and be upwards compatible, something like
x = np.asarray(x, =np.float64)
that converts ints, bool and lower precision to float64 but leaves
higher precision float and complex double
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Question about namespace
why is there bool and bool_ ?
np.bool(True) + np.bool(True)
2
np.bool_(True) + np.bool_(True)
True
type(np.bool(True))
type
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 08:52 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything to require a numpy array with a minimum numeric dtype?
To avoid lower precision calculations and be upwards compatible, something
Interesting observation, (while lurking on a pull request)
np.add.reduce(np.arange(5)3)
3
np.add((np.arange(5)3), (np.arange(5)3))
array([ True, True, True, False, False], dtype=bool)
I often use summing of an array of boolean but didn't know the second behavior
Josef
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On 7 Jun 2013 21:58, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting observation, (while lurking on a pull request)
np.add.reduce(np.arange(5)3)
3
np.add((np.arange(5)3), (np.arange(5)3))
array([ True, True, True, False,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:08 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On 7 Jun 2013 21:58, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting observation, (while lurking on a pull request)
np.add.reduce(np.arange(5)3)
3
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Hi,
the current numpy master has deprecated non-integers for the use of
indexing (not-fancy yet). However I think this should be moved further
down in the numpy machinery which means that the conversion utils
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05/29/2013 06:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
There is a PR adding quickselect to numpy as a function
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
There is a PR adding quickselect to numpy as a function `partition`.
Comments on name and exposure in the numpy API are welcome.
I think the name is fine. It's possible to get used to it.
One possible
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/24/13, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Joe Piccoli joe13...@comcast.net wrote:
Hello,
** **
I've been trying to install NumPy to run with Eclipse on Windows Vista.
After installing (I thought) NumPy I was seeing:
** **
ImportError: Error importing numpy: you should not try to import
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
li...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Wed, 01 May 2013, Sebastian Berg wrote:
btw -- is there something like panda's vbench for numpy? i.e. where
it would be possible to track/visualize such performance
improvements/hits?
Sorry if it seemed
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ralf Gommers
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
HI,
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko li...@onerussian.com
wrote:
On Wed, 01 May 2013, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
not sure there is anything to fix here. Third-party code relying on a
certain
Is there a available function to convert an int to binary
representation as sequence of 0 and 1?
binary_repr produces strings and is not vectorized
np.binary_repr(5)
'101'
np.binary_repr(5, width=4)
'0101'
np.binary_repr(np.arange(5), width=4)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 11:15 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a available function to convert an int to binary
representation as sequence of 0 and 1?
Maybe unpackbits/packbits? It only supports the
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/13, josef.p...@gmail.com josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a available function to convert an int to binary
representation as sequence of 0 and 1?
binary_repr produces strings and is not
the new documentation
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1589706/iterating-over-arbitrary-dimension-of-numpy-array
second answer, 1st answer is what I usually use
search term [numpy] iterate over axis
Josef
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Andrew Giessel
andrew_gies...@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
I respect this opinion. However (and maybe this is legacy), while reading
through the numeric.py source file, I was surprised at how
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 23:33 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 12:13 -0500, Jonathan Helmus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 12:13 -0500, Jonathan Helmus wrote:
Back in December it was pointed out on the scipy-user list[1] that
numpy has a percentile function which has similar functionality to
scipy's
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Paul Ivanov pivanov314 at gmail.com writes:
[clip]
In a related note - it should be made clear who the core
committers are, at this point. The github organization lists the
following eight:
charris
cournape
njsmith
pv
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Steve Waterbury water...@pangalactic.us wrote:
On 04/07/2013 05:30 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Steve Waterbury
water...@pangalactic.us wrote:
On 04/07/2013 05:02 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:06
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Dave Hirschfeld
dave.hirschf...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com writes:
Hi All,There is a PR that adds some blas and lapack functions to numpy. I'm
thinking that if that PR is merged it would be good to move all of the blas
and
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:54 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Before you answer that -- does anyone see a use case for the 'A' and
'K' flags that can't be reasonably easily accomplished with .view() or
Catching up with numpy 1.6
'No' means: I don't think it makes sense given the current behavior of numpy
with respect to functions that are designed to return views
(and copy memory only if there is no way to make a view)
One objective of functions that create views is *not* to change the
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for the compliment, it's more
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is like observing that if I say go North then it's ambiguous
about whether I want you to drive or walk, and concluding that we need
new
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is like observing that if I say go North then it's ambiguous
about whether I
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 14:04 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:37 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two separate ideas needed to understand ordering in ravel and
reshape:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pierre Haessig pierre.haes...@crans.org
wrote:
Hi Sudheer,
Le 14/03/2013 10:18, Sudheer Joseph a écrit :
Dear Numpy/Scipy experts,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Siu Kwan Lam s...@continuum.io wrote:
My
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Robert Kern
Please post inline so we have the context.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:40 AM, David Pine djp...@gmail.com wrote:
Chuck,
Thanks for the quick reply.
1. I see your point about zero weights but the code in its current form
doesn't take into account zero weights in counting the degrees of
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, David Pine djp...@gmail.com wrote:
Pauli, Josef, Chuck,
I read over the discussion on curve_fit. I believe I now understand what
people are trying to do when they write about scaling the weighting and/or
covariance matrix. And I agree that what polyfit does
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm hoping this discussion will return to the drawing the line question.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:33 PM, eat e.antero.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Huh,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:33 PM, eat e.antero.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Huh,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jaakko Luttinen
jaakko.lutti...@aalto.fi wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if anyone could help me in finding a memory leak problem
with NumPy. My project is quite massive and I haven't been able to
construct a simple example which would reproduce the problem..
I
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki mail.t...@gmx.de
wrote:
First, sorry that i didnt search for an old thread, but because i
disagree
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki mail.t...@gmx.de
wrote:
First, sorry
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki mail.t...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
to
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi everybody,
(just coming from a discussion on the performance of Matplotlib's
(x)corr function which uses np.correlate)
There have been already many discussions on how to compute
(cross-)correlations of
I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of
interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to
take.
I thought that's very useful, but didn't make a note.
Now, I have no idea where I saw this (I thought numpy), and I cannot
find it anywhere.
any clues?
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 13:08 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of
interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to
take.
I
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:08 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of
interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to
take.
I thought that's
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 1/27/2013 11:40 AM, olli.wal...@elisanet.fi wrote:
Hi,
if I want to have a painless Python installation build against Intel MKL on
Windows, one obvious choice is to just buy the EPD package. However,
as I already do
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Matthieu Brucher
matthieu.bruc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Actually, this behavior is already present in other languages, so I'm -1 on
additional verbosity.
Of course a += b is not the same as a = a + b. The first one modifies the
object a, the second one creates
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Jim Vickroy jim.vick...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 1/16/2013 11:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 16 Jan 2013 17:54, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
a = np.random.random_integers(0, 5, size=5)
b
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:24 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Jim Vickroy jim.vick...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 1/16/2013 11:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On 16 Jan 2013 17:54,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, eat e.antero.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In a recent thread
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/52772 it was
proposed that .fill(.) should return self as an alternative for a trivial
two-liner.
I'm raising now the question: what if all
201 - 300 of 1192 matches
Mail list logo
