On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
>>> > wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> i know that the array object is a
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jaakko Luttinen
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering if anyone could help me in finding a memory leak problem
> with NumPy. My project is quite massive and I haven't been able to
> construct a simple example which would reproduce the problem..
>
> I have an iterative a
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
>>> to see the abs method added, especially do
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pierre Haessig
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> (just coming from a discussion on the performance of Matplotlib's
> (x)corr function which uses np.correlate)
>
> There have been already many discussions on how to compute
> (cross-)correlations of time-series in Python (l
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:08 PM, wrote:
>>
>> I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of
>> interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to
>> take.
>> I thought that's very useful, but didn't m
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 13:08 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of
>> interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to
>> take.
>> I thought that's very use
I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of
interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to
take.
I thought that's very useful, but didn't make a note.
Now, I have no idea where I saw this (I thought numpy), and I cannot
find it anywhere.
any clues?
Th
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see there is no Windows 64 bit installer for the 1.7 rc1.
related:
Is there any chance to get newer mingw or mingw-w64 support "soonish"?
Josef
>
> Is there any prospect of a 64 bit installer for the full release?
>
> Can I help?
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 1/27/2013 11:40 AM, olli.wal...@elisanet.fi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if I want to have a painless Python installation build against Intel MKL on
>> Windows, one obvious choice is to just buy the EPD package. However,
>> as I already do have
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:24 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/16/2013 11:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 Jan 2013 17:54, wrote:
>>> > >>> a = np.random.random_integers(0, 5,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>>
>> On 1/16/2013 11:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On 16 Jan 2013 17:54, wrote:
>> > >>> a = np.random.random_integers(0, 5, size=5)
>> > >>> b = a.sort()
>> > >>> b
>> > >>> a
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Matthieu Brucher
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Actually, this behavior is already present in other languages, so I'm -1 on
> additional verbosity.
> Of course a += b is not the same as a = a + b. The first one modifies the
> object a, the second one creates a new object and put
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Patrick Marsh
wrote:
> Thanks, everyone for chiming in. Now that I know this behavior exists, I
> can explicitly prevent it in my code. However, it would be nice if a warning
> or something was generated to alert users about the inconsistency between
> var += ...
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, eat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In a recent thread
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/52772 it was
> proposed that .fill(.) should return self as an alternative for a trivial
> two-liner.
>
> I'm raising now the question: what if all in-place operati
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
>> 2013/1/14 Matthew Brett :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Dave Hirschfeld
>>> wrote:
Robert Kern gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>> >
> >>> > One alternative
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
> 2013/1/14 Matthew Brett :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Dave Hirschfeld
>> wrote:
>>> Robert Kern gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > One alternative that does not expand the API with two-liners is to
>>>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> PR 2875 adds two new functions, that generalize zeros(), ones(),
> zeros_like(), ones_like(), by simply taking an arbitrary fill value:
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2875
> So
> np.ones((10, 10))
> is the same as
>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Till Stensitz wrote:
> Hi,
> i did some profiling and testing of my data-fitting code.
> One of its core parts is doing some linear least squares,
> until now i used np.linalg.lstsq. Most of time the size
> a is (250, 7) and of b is (250, 800).
My guess is that thi
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Question for everyone, is this really reasonable:
>
import numpy as np
from operator import index
index(np.array([[5]]))
> 5
int(np.array([[5]]))
> 5
[0,1,2,3][np.array([[2]])]
> 2
Not sure I understand the point
l
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:46 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:54 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM, wrote:
>>> np.__version__
'1.6.2'
>>> aa
array([1970-01-13 96:00:00, 1970-01-13 12
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:54 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> >>> np.__version__
>>> '1.6.2'
>>> >>> aa
>>> array([1970-01-13 96:00:00, 1970-01-13 120:00:00, 1970-01-13 144:00:00,
>>>1970-01-13
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:39 PM, wrote:
>>
>> >>> np.__version__
>> '1.6.2'
>> >>> aa
>> array([1970-01-13 96:00:00, 1970-01-13 120:00:00, 1970-01-13 144:00:00,
>>1970-01-13 168:00:00, 1970-01-13 192:00:00], dtype=datetime64[ns]
A followup on the previous thread on scalar speed.
operations with numpy scalars
I can *maybe* understand this
>>> np.array(2)[()] * [0.5, 1]
[0.5, 1, 0.5, 1]
but don't understand this
>>> np.array(2.+0.1j)[()] * [0.5, 1]
__main__:1: ComplexWarning: Casting complex values to real discards
the
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Raul Cota wrote:
>> I finally decided to track down the problem and I started by getting
>> Python 2.6 from source and profiling it in one of my cases. By far the
>> biggest bottleneck came out to be PyString
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 16:05 +0100, Daπid wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, wrote:
>> > Why don't operations on empty arrays not return empty arrays?
>>
>> Because functions like mean or std are expected to return a scalar.
>> Fun
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 22:58 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:45 PM, wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Olivier Dela
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:58 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:45 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
>>> > Current behavior looks sensible to me. I personally would prefer no
>>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:45 PM, wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
>> > Current behavior looks sensible to me. I personally would prefer no
>> > warning
>> > but I think it makes sense to have on
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
> Current behavior looks sensible to me. I personally would prefer no warning
> but I think it makes sense to have one as it can be helpful to detect issues
> faster.
I agree that nan should be the correct answer.
(I gave up trying to defi
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Warren Weckesser
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Phillip Feldman
> wrote:
>>
>> numpy.unique behaves as I would expect for small inputs like the
>> following:
>>
>> In [12]: x= [0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 2, 3]
>>
>> In [13]: unique(x, return_index=True)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:59 PM, klo uo wrote:
> Thanks for your reply
>
> I suppose, variable length signals are split on equal parts and dominant
> harmonic is extracted. Then scatter plot shows this pattern, which has some
> low correlation, but I can't abstract what could be concluded from gri
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:27 AM, David Warde-Farley
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:04 AM, wrote:
>
>> Fine, I didn't understand that part correctly.
>>
>> I have no opinion in that case.
>> (In statsmodels we only use copy the array method and through np.array().)
>
> Do you implement __copy
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48 PM, David Warde-Farley
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:39 PM, wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:58 PM, David Warde-Farley
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Sebastian Berg
>>> wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:48 -0400, David Warde-Farley wrote
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:58 PM, David Warde-Farley
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:48 -0400, David Warde-Farley wrote:
>
>> Don't worry about that failure on Travis... It happens randomly on at
>> the moment and its unrelated to anyth
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:33 PM, denis wrote:
> Folks,
>np.linalg.lstsq of a random-uniform A 50 x 32 with 3 columns all 0
> returns x[:3] 0 as expected,
> but 4 columns all 0 => huge x:
> lstsq (50, 32) with 4 columns all 0:
> [ -3.7e+09 -3.6e+13 -1.9e+13 -2.9e+12 7.3e-01 ...
>
> Thi
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Dan Goodman wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 18:17, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>> Do you mean scalars or arrays? For me set_printoptions only affects
>> arrays and not scalars. Both float32 and float64 arrays work as advertised:
>
> Yep, I mean scalars (although as Warren noted, it
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>> Eh, just installing numpy with "python setup.py install" uses plain
>> distutils, not setuptools. So there indeed isn't an entry in
>> easy-install.pth. Which some consider a feature
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ondřej Čertík
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Ondřej Čertík
wrote:
> On Tue,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Ondřej Čertík
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Ondřej Čertík
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 9:24 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first beta release of
>> NumPy 1.7.0b1.
>>
>> Sources and binary installers can be found at
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/f
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andrea Gavana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> once again, my apologies for a (possibly) very ignorant question,
> my google-fu is failing me... also because I am not sure of what
> exactly I should look for.
>
> My problem is relatively simple. Let's assume I have two Pyt
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Yi, Chuang wrote:
> Thank you Josef, df can be less than 1 as long as it is nonnegative:
>
> http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/stats/html/Chisquare.html
>
> Here is an example in R:
>
>> Z0<-rchisq(2,df=0.5,ncp =2)
>> Z0
> [1] 0.5056454 2.0427540
>
> T
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Yi, Chuang
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am a new user of Python. I have a couple of questions that would
>> appreciate your guidance!
>>
>>
>>
>> QQ Plot in Python: I could not find any functions in
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Yi, Chuang
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am a new user of Python. I have a couple of questions that would
> appreciate your guidance!
>
>
>
> QQ Plot in Python: I could not find any functions in either Numpy or Scipy
> to do QQ Plot of two vectors of data. For example
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10. aug. 2012, at 09:54, Mark Bakker wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am giving this a second try. Can anybody help me out?
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 10. aug. 2012, at 09:54, Mark Bakker wrote:
> >
> >> I am giving this a second try. Can anybody help me out?
> >>
> >> I think there is a problem with assigning a 1D
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>> It appears you're right!
nice idea:
https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc/blob/master/pymc/distributions.py#L1670
>>
>> http://pymc-devs.github.com/pymc/distributions.html?highlight=h
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> in recent work with a colleague, the need came up for a multivariate
>> hypergeometric sampler; I had a look in the numpy code and saw we have
>> the bivariate version, but not the mul
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in recent work with a colleague, the need came up for a multivariate
> hypergeometric sampler; I had a look in the numpy code and saw we have
> the bivariate version, but not the multivariate one.
>
> I had a look at the code in s
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:02 PM, T J wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, srean wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anecdotal data-point:
>> I have been happy with SO in general. It works for certain types of
>> queries very well. OTOH if the answer to the question is known only to
>> a few and he/she does not
just some statistics
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/numpy
769 followers, 2,850 questions tagged
a guess: average response time for regular usage question far less than an hour
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/scipy
446 followers, 991questions tagged
http://stackoverflow.co
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>> On 6/26/2012 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> For context, consider that for many years, the word "gr
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:53 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:25 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
You are still missing the point that there was already a choice
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:25 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> You are still missing the point that there was already a choice that was
>> made in the previous class --- made in Numeric actually.
>>
>> You made a change to that. It is the change that is 'gr
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> You are still missing the point that there was already a choice that was
> made in the previous class --- made in Numeric actually.
>
> You made a change to that. It is the change that is 'gratuitous'. The pain
> and unnecessary overhead
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:06 P
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2012, at 4:45 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to convert an array to string elements in numpy,
>> without knowing the string length?
>
> Not really. In the next release of NumPy you should be able to do.
>
Is there a way to convert an array to string elements in numpy,
without knowing the string length?
>>> arr2 = np.arange(8, 13)
>>> arr2.astype(str) # bad
array(['8', '9', '1', '1', '1'],
dtype='|S1')
>>> arr2.astype('S2')
array(['8', '9', '10', '11', '12'],
dtype='|S2')
>>> map(s
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 a
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/74b9f5eef8fac643bf9012dbb2ac6b4b19f46892
broke return_inverse for structured arrays, because of the use of mergesort
I'm using structured dtypes to get uniques and return_inverse by rows
>>> groups = np.random.randint(0,4,size=(10,2))
>>> groups_ = groups.vie
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Larsen, Brian A wrote:
>> This is the stack overflow discussion mentioned.
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9164269/can-you-tell-if-an-array-is-a-view-of-another
>>
>> I basically implemented the an
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Tim Cera wrote:
>>>
>> Docstrings are not stored in .rst files but in the numpy sources, so there
>> are some non-trivial technical and workflow details missing here. But
>> besides that, I think translating everything (even into a single language)
>> is a massive
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Fabrice Silva wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting into troubles when using numpy.testing with coverage. A
> minimal example package is atached to this email. Unpack and run:
>
> $ python -c "import mypackage; mypackage.test(verbose=10,coverage=False)"
> $ python -c "impor
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to figure out how to run NumPy's tests with coverage enabled
>> (i.e.
>> numpy.test(coverage=True) ). I can run the tests successfully like this:
>
>
> This seems
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>> I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not keyword/tag
>> based.
>
> Github issues does have full-text search, and up until now I haven't
> really had too many
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
>> to solve:
>> 1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
>
> Now that it comes too late: with some luck, I
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09, Bruno Santos wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I have a bit of code where I am using rpy2 to import R phyper so I can
>> perform an hypergeometric test. Unfortunately our cluster does not have a
>> functional insta
We are pleased to announce the release of statsmodels 0.4.0.
The big changes in this release are that most models can now be used
with Pandas dataframes, and that we dropped the scikits namespace.
Importing scikits.statsmodels is still possible but will be removed in
the future.
Pandas is now a re
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
>>> topics - too many
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
>
> Do you agree that Numpy has not been ver
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
>>> maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
>>>
>>> Compared to - say - Sympy?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm c
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>> Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
>
> Well, at least I think that an inquisitive query about someone's
> background, phrased like that, can be very easily mis
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
>>
>> a) All arrays should be implicitly masked, even if the mask isn't
>> initially allocated. The maskna keyword can then be removed, taking
>> with it the sense that there are two ki
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
>> >>
>> >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
>> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib
>> promises a list of functions that does not appear (at the moment, anyway).
>
> This doesn't seem to be
2012/4/2 Hongbin Zhang :
> Dear Python-users,
>
> I am currently very confused about the Scipy routine to obtain the
> eigenvectors of a complex matrix.
> In attached you find two files to diagonalize a 2X2 complex Hermitian
> matrix, however, on my computer,
>
> If I run python, I got:
>
> [[ 0.80
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
>> I am seeing some very strange behavior searching a unicode array. The
>> attached code outputs the following:
>> UNICODE
>> Is sorted: True
>> Search sorted by iteration, left: [0, 1, 2, 4,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
> I am seeing some very strange behavior searching a unicode array. The
> attached code outputs the following:
> UNICODE
> Is sorted: True
> Search sorted by iteration, left: [0, 1, 2, 4, 4, 6, 6, 8, 8, 10, 10,
> 12, 12, 13]
> Search sor
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Pierre Haessig
wrote:
> Le 27/03/2012 18:56, josef.p...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> similar to std, var, histogram, ... some functions from scipy.stats
>> are now in numpy.
> Ok, historical reasons then. Fair enough.
> Would a "See also: numpy.percentile" make sense in
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Pierre Haessig
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A quick question I've had in mind for some time but didn't find a solution :
> Is there a significant difference between "numpy.percentile" and
> "scipy.stats.scoreatpercentile" ?
>
> Of course the signatures are somewhat different,
What happened to any plans for GSOC?
http://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2012
Josef
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Ilan Schnell wrote:
> I just did a quick test across all supported EPD platforms:
> win-64: float96 No, float128 No
> win-32: float96 No, float128 No
> osx-64: float96 No, float128 Yes
> osx-32: float96 No, float128 Yes
> rh3-64: float96 No, float128 Yes
> rh3-32:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Many here have probably received the message from github about push/pull
> access being blocked until you have auditied your ssh keys. To generate a
> key fingerprint on fedora, I did the following:
>
> $charris@f16 ~$ ssh-keyge
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
> Le 5 mars 2012 14:29, Keith Goodman a écrit :
>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> > Keith Goodman wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Neal Becker
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> What is a simple, efficient way
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chao YUE wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Sorry this is not the good place to ask but I think there must be someone
> who has done this before.
> Is there any way to see the execution of python script line by line as the
> verbose model of shell script?
> this can be done ei
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Zayd YAKOUBI wrote:
> thank you very much,
> In fact, the functions of these two measures are for binary vectors, and I
> have not found their extension to real data such as: 0.7, 0.9, 1.7
> Knowing that I applied to this data and it worked well..
>
> Have an
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
> Sorry I can't help, but I'd just suggest to post this on the scipy mailing
> list as you may get more replies there.
>
> -=- Olivier
>
> Le 1 mars 2012 10:24, Pierre Barthelemy a écrit :
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> i am writing a program for d
(I got distracted by some numerical accuracy checks. np.polyfit looks
good in NIST test.)
Does numpy have something like this?
def lre(actual, desired):
'''calculate log relative error, number of correct significant digits
not an informative function name
Parameters
--
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 02/18/2012 08:52 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, February 18, 2012, Sturla Molden wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 17:12 skrev Ala
(on a ambiguous day, pessimistic or optimistic?)
Numpy is a monster written by a bunch of amateurs (engineers and
scientists), with a glacial pace of development.
If we want to make any progress to the world dominance of python in
science, we need to go professionally about it.
First we need to
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:29 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> Le 18 févr. 2012 00:58, "Charles R Harris" a
> écrit :
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think c++ has any significant advantage over c for high
>>> performance libraries. I am
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, February 16, 2012, John Hunter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Alan G Isaac
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/16/2012 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>>> > This has not been an encouraging episode in striving for con
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Warren Weckesser
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>>
>> Mark Wiebe and I have been discussing off and on (as well as talking with
>> Charles) a good way forward to balance two competing desires:
>>
>> * addition of new
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>> > If non-contributing users came along on the Cython list demanding that
>> > we set up a system to se
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:30 AM, wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Warren Weckesser
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Pierre Haessig
>>> wrote:
Le 16/02/2012 16:20, josef.p...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
301 - 400 of 1288 matches
Mail list logo
