Ok, so I've looked a bit into it tonight:
- used mingw-w64 4.8.1 (32 bits host)
- openblas binaries available on the official website (seem to be built
with mingw w64)
- used -static-libgcc, -static-libstdc++ and -static-libgfortran
- building numpy went ok, test suite almost passes, nothing
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:22 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so I've looked a bit into it tonight:
- used mingw-w64 4.8.1 (32 bits host)
- openblas binaries available on the official website (seem to be built
with mingw w64)
- used -static-libgcc, -static-libstdc++ and
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:22 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, so I've looked a bit into it tonight:
- used mingw-w64 4.8.1 (32 bits host)
- openblas binaries available on the official website (seem to be built
with mingw w64)
- used -static-libgcc, -static-libstdc++ and
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Why not just release numpy 1.8 with the old and terrible system? As
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of
which
binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which
binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe
32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
64
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of
which
binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For
On Sep 15, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which
binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe
[byte]
For Mac there is first the question of OS X versions,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
New summary
1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC,
linked with MKL
These should be good for both windows
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
New summary
1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2,
New summary
1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC, linked
with MKL
These should be good for both windows 7 and window 8.
For Mac there is first the question of OS X versions, (10.5?), 10.6,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
New summary
32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC, linked with
MKL
These should be good for both windows 7 and window 8.
In article 8e95a257-3f06-43b7-8407-95916d284...@mac.com,
William Ray Wing w...@mac.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which
binary builds so put up
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
New summary
32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Why not just release numpy 1.8 with the old and terrible system? As
you know I'm 110% in favor of getting rid of it, but 1.8 is ready to
go and 1.9 is coming soon enough, and the old and terrible system does
work right
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:31 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R
On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
16.09.2013 16:31, William Ray Wing kirjoitti:
[clip]
If you will forgive an observation from a Mac user and (amateur) developer.
I have twice tried to build Numpy from source and both times failed.
The problem was that I couldn't
In article
cabl7cqg5vv_vnp0hbdx+ys6gt0npwqehth3mwb6j65ow9+1...@mail.gmail.com,
Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
New summary
1. 32 bit windows,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Why not just release numpy 1.8 with the old and terrible system? As
you know I'm 110% in favor of getting rid of it, but 1.8 is ready to
go and
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Russell E. Owen ro...@uw.edu wrote:
In article
cabl7cqg5vv_vnp0hbdx+ys6gt0npwqehth3mwb6j65ow9+1...@mail.gmail.com,
Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Another question is, can we start distributing wheels yet?
yes, yes, yes -- though maybe not for the beta testing.
wheels will never catch on , or even get debugged if none of us use them.
-Chris
--
Christopher
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:31 AM, William Ray Wing w...@mac.com wrote:
If you will forgive an observation from a Mac user and (amateur)
developer. I have twice tried to build Numpy from source and both times
failed. The problem was that I couldn't find a single comprehensive set of
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.comwrote:
Doing that right is important not just for SciPy but for any
other downstream package including C code compiled
against the NumPy C API (and the people doing this
probably will only have access to free compilers).
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:31 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which
binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe
1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC, linked
with MKL
, September 15, 2013 6:04 PM
To: numpy-discussion
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which
binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe
1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Shahrokh Mortazavi
smor...@exchange.microsoft.com wrote:
hi chuck,
this is shahrokh mortazavi from microsoft (proj lead on PTVS
http://pytools.codeplex.com .
1. 1st - thank you and everyone else involved for helping creating,
maintain deliver these
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of which
binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe
32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC
64
31 matches
Mail list logo
