Timothy Hochberg wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 5:48 PM, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joris De Ridder wrote:
On 30 Jan 2008, at 00:32, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
median moved
On Jan 30, 2008 10:41 AM, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, we could start to do that (spit out a warning in 1.0.5). This
should definitely be done in 1.0.6
Perhaps we use axis=None to start with and then check for that and spit
out the warning (and change axis to 0). Thanks
This feature request has been repeatedly asked before (e.g. 6 months
ago). The relevant ticket (#558, although this only asks for axis
support) mentions a milestone 1.1. I would like to ask if it could be
moved somewhat higher on the priority list.
I provided some code for axis support
Hi,
median moved mediandim0
implementation of medianwithaxis or similar, with same call
signature as mean.
Deprecation warning for use of median, and return of mediandim0 for
now. Eventual move of median to return medianwithaxis.
This would confuse people even more, I'm afraid.
On Jan 29, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Joris De Ridder wrote:
This feature request has been repeatedly asked before (e.g. 6 months
ago). The relevant ticket (#558, although this only asks for axis
support) mentions a milestone 1.1. I would like to ask if it could be
moved somewhat higher on the
Considering that many of the statistical functions (mean, std, median)
must iterate over all the data and that people (or at least myself)
typically call them sequentially on the same data, it may make sense to
make a super-function with less repetition.
Instead of:
x_mean = np.mean(x)
x_median =
Andrew Straw wrote:
Considering that many of the statistical functions (mean, std, median)
must iterate over all the data and that people (or at least myself)
typically call them sequentially on the same data, it may make sense to
make a super-function with less repetition.
Hi,
median moved mediandim0
implementation of medianwithaxis or similar, with same call
signature as mean.
But - for the median function change - do we agree that this should be
changed? I think it is a significant wart in the numpy API, and has
caught quite a few people...
Matthew
Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
median moved mediandim0
implementation of medianwithaxis or similar, with same call
signature as mean.
But - for the median function change - do we agree that this should be
changed? I think it is a significant wart in the numpy API, and has
caught
On 30 Jan 2008, at 00:32, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
median moved mediandim0
implementation of medianwithaxis or similar, with same call
signature as mean.
But - for the median function change - do we agree that this should
be
changed? I think it is a
Joris De Ridder wrote:
On 30 Jan 2008, at 00:32, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
median moved mediandim0
implementation of medianwithaxis or similar, with same call
signature as mean.
But - for the median function change - do we agree
11 matches
Mail list logo
