Joris De Ridder wrote: > On 30 Jan 2008, at 00:32, Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > > >> Matthew Brett wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>>>>>> median moved mediandim0 >>>>>>> implementation of medianwithaxis or similar, with same call >>>>>>> signature as mean. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> But - for the median function change - do we agree that this should >>> be >>> changed? I think it is a significant wart in the numpy API, and has >>> caught quite a few people... >>> >>> >> I'm fine with a median API change for 1.1. >> >> We can add the axis keyword for 1.0.5 as long as the default stays the >> same. We can also add the other keywords as well if appropriate >> defaults can be determined. >> > > Do you mean creating a median(a, axis=0) for 1.0.5, and changing it to > median(a,axis=None) for 1.1? (Modulo other keywords). >
Yes. That is the approach I prefer. -Travis _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
