Robert Kern wrote:
Chris Barker wrote:
What if your objects were nested sequences, and you wanted to partly
flatten them -- which would you flatten?
I'm pretty sure that that is exactly the ambiguity that the depth option
resolves. Can you give me an example where it's still ambiguous with
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
I don't think it is time to move wholesale to something like Mercurial
or bzr. I would prefer it if all of the Enthought-hosted projects
moved to the (new) system at once, which is not going to happen in the
short term (but long term of course it's an open
Christopher Barker wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Chris Barker wrote:
What if your objects were nested sequences, and you wanted to partly
flatten them -- which would you flatten?
I'm pretty sure that that is exactly the ambiguity that the depth option
resolves. Can you give me an example where
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/MergeProgram
This is a bit puzzling. I understand better merging isn't the only
reason to choose DVCS, but the above page basically says that
Mercurial just uses whatever external merge program it can find. So
the file-level merging sounds like it
Bill Baxter wrote:
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/MergeProgram
This is a bit puzzling. I understand better merging isn't the only
reason to choose DVCS, but the above page basically says that
Mercurial just uses whatever external merge program it can find. So
the
Robert Kern wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/MergeProgram
This is a bit puzzling. I understand better merging isn't the only
reason to choose DVCS, but the above page basically says that
Mercurial just uses whatever external merge program it can
David Cournapeau wrote:
Does good merging only depends on the above ? Martin Pool, one of the
bzr programmer, wrote this article two years ago:
http://sourcefrog.net/weblog/software/vc/derivatives.html
which I found both enlightening and easy to follow.
My terminology was
On Jan 6, 2008 6:38 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/MergeProgram
This is a bit puzzling. I understand better merging isn't the only
reason to choose DVCS, but the above page basically says that
Mercurial just
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 6:38 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/MergeProgram
This is a bit puzzling. I understand better merging isn't the only
reason to choose DVCS, but the above page basically says that
Robert Kern wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
It seems that PyArray_FromAny does not accept a generator?
Seems like this would be useful.
It's difficult to do all the magical interpretation that PyArray_FromAny()
does with a iterator of unknown length. In Python, we have fromiter()
which will
I've been playing around with Hg on windows for an hour or so now. My
overall impression is that the installation process isn't quite there
yet.
The basic binary installer goes very smoothly, and after that I was
able to open up a prompt and type hg commands right away. But going
through the
On Jan 7, 2008 1:32 AM, Bill Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been playing around with Hg on windows for an hour or so now. My
overall impression is that the installation process isn't quite there
yet.
The basic binary installer goes very smoothly, and after that I was
able to open up a
David Cournapeau cournape at gmail.com writes:
The open solaris project documented their choice, too:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/history/
Contrary to mozilla, solaris is using hg as the main VCS.
Mozilla will be using mercurial (hg) too, but decided to do the full
In numpy book, it says:
fromiter (iter or gen, dtype=None)
but that's not true:
Help on built-in function fromiter in module numpy.core.multiarray:
fromiter(...)
fromiter(iterable, dtype, count=-1)
dtype is required
___
Numpy-discussion mailing
On Jan 7, 2008 1:49 AM, Rafael Villar Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Cournapeau cournape at gmail.com writes:
The open solaris project documented their choice, too:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/history/
Contrary to mozilla, solaris is using hg as the main
*) After running the binary installer, apparently you're supposed to
go edit some .ini file to specify your username. It seems it will
work ok even if you don't set your username, but since it is
apparently highly recommended, the installer just should ask you as
part of the install
I also have been playing with Hg on Windows apropos discussions on the
list. I plan to move repositories at my lab to Hg. I second everything
Bill Baxter has said. I plan to use Hg myself and to continue exploring
its use but TortoiseHg is not yet at the level of ease of use that
TortoiseSVN is
On Jan 7, 2008 1:32 AM, Bill Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been playing around with Hg on windows for an hour or so now. My
overall impression is that the installation process isn't quite there
yet.
The basic binary installer goes very smoothly, and after that I was
able to open up a
David Cournapeau wrote:
[...]
To be frank, I did not realize that mercurial was that popular (which
makes it more of an argument than I initially thought: I assumed -
wrongly it seems - that both had a similar user-base)
David,
One reason that they apparently do not is that mercurial has been
Did you look at TourtiseHg?
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Robert Kern wrote:
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
I don't think it is time to move wholesale to something like Mercurial
or bzr. I would prefer it if all of the Enthought-hosted projects
moved to the (new) system at once, which is not going to happen in the
short term (but long term of
On Jan 7, 2008 2:30 AM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to what the trade-offs are. It mentions batteries included binary
distributions as one solution without giving any link.
FIY, it seems you can find it here (I have not tried it):
http://qct.sourceforge.net/Mercurial-BI.html
Hi all,
below is the full text of the announcement, which has also been posted here:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days8
Many thanks to Enthought for the generous support they've offered! We
really look forward to this meeting being a great opportunity for
collaboration between the Scipy and Sage
23 matches
Mail list logo
