On 14 Jun 2013 09:18, Arink Verma arinkve...@gmail.com wrote:
You're looking for the ProfilerStart/ProfilerStop functions, the
former takes a filename to write the profiler to (like ls.prof or
x-plus-x.prof):
http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@scipy.org/msg41451.html
I
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:06 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/13 10:36 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas
aldcr...@head.cfa.harvard.edu
On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never guess what it is doing
from the name
That suggests np.fromvalues.
But more important than the name I think
is allowing broadcasting of the values,
based on NumPy's broadcasting rules.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río
jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Sounds like a doc bug. (Probably someone being over-careful -- the
default for many operations in numpy is that it's undefined whether
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Phil Hodge ho...@stsci.edu wrote:
I would interpret np.filled as a test, asking whether the array is
filled. If the function is supposed to do something related to
assigning values, the name should be a verb.
That's a plausible convention, but it's not the
On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never guess what it is
doing from the name
That suggests np.fromvalues.
But more important than the name I think
is allowing broadcasting of the values,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never guess what it is
doing from the name
That suggests np.fromvalues.
But more
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Personally I think that overloading np.empty is horribly ugly, will
continue confusing newbies and everyone else indefinitely, and I'm
100% convinced that we'll regret
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never
On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
But more important than the name I think
is allowing broadcasting of the values,
based on NumPy's broadcasting rules.
Broadcasting a scalar is then a special case,
even if it is the case that has dominated this thread.
On 6/14/2013 1:18 PM, Eric
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Personally I think that overloading np.empty is horribly ugly, will
continue confusing newbies and
On 2013/06/14 7:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Personally I think that overloading np.empty is horribly ugly, will
continue confusing newbies and everyone else indefinitely, and
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Despite heroic efforts on the part
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Jaffe a.h.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/06/2013 22:11, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
The binaries will still be built against python.org Python, so there
shouldn't be an
A nice summary of the discussions from a year ago is here:
http://www.numpy.org/NA-overview.html
It provides food for thought.
Eric
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Dear Numpy Users,
I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
order special polynomial, where special could refer to Hermite,
Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
polynomials, but I couldn't find a convenience function that gives me
a polynomial
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:59:03PM -0400, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Numpy Users,
I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
order special polynomial, where special could refer to Hermite,
Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
polynomials,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Kumar Appaiah a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.inwrote:
Dear Numpy Users,
I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
order special polynomial, where special could refer to Hermite,
Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:07:57PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
order special polynomial, where special could refer to Hermite,
Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
polynomials,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:29:11AM -0400, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I now see that the polynomial structure is intended to be rich, as
opposed to the naïve function that I proposed. In the least, though,
the documentation could reflect the example you gave me. I could send
a patch that adds an
20 matches
Mail list logo
