Re: [Numpy-discussion] import overhead of numpy.testing

2013-08-11 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: Would there be some sort of way to detect that numpy.testing wasn't explicitly imported and issue a deprecation warning? Say, move the code into numpy._testing, import in into the namespace as testing, but then have the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Releaseplan for 1.8?

2013-08-11 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Till Stensitzki mail.t...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, there already a plan to release 1.8? I would like to play around with gufuncs. No fixed plan I think, but there aren't a lot of blockers: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?milestone=1page=1state=open. Main issue

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Releaseplan for 1.8?

2013-08-11 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Till Stensitzki mail.t...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, there already a plan to release 1.8? I would like to play around with gufuncs. No fixed plan I think, but there aren't a lot of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] import overhead of numpy.testing

2013-08-11 Thread Benjamin Root
On Aug 11, 2013 5:02 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: Would there be some sort of way to detect that numpy.testing wasn't explicitly imported and issue a deprecation warning? Say, move the code into

Re: [Numpy-discussion] import overhead of numpy.testing

2013-08-11 Thread Andrew Dalke
On Aug 11, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: The idea would be that within numpy (and we should fix SciPy as well), we would always import numpy._testing as testing, and not import testing.py ourselves. The problem is the existing code out there which does: import numpy as np ...

Re: [Numpy-discussion] import overhead of numpy.testing

2013-08-11 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: On Aug 11, 2013 5:02 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: Would there be some sort of way to detect that numpy.testing wasn't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Nanmean review

2013-08-11 Thread Arnaldo Russo
Congratulations!! I have been waiting for a long time to see a nanmean function inside numpy. I never looked inside this function, but I'm happy seeing this discussion on github! Cheers, Arnaldo. --- *Arnaldo D'Amaral Pereira Granja Russo* Lab. de Estudos dos Oceanos e Clima Instituto de

Re: [Numpy-discussion] import overhead of numpy.testing

2013-08-11 Thread Benjamin Root
On Aug 11, 2013 4:37 PM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote: On Aug 11, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: The idea would be that within numpy (and we should fix SciPy as well), we would always import numpy._testing as testing, and not import testing.py ourselves. The problem