On 30 Oct 2014 03:58, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
We cannot bundle NumPy or SciPy binaries with FFTW due to GPL [*], but
as I understand it we already have permission from Intel to bundle
binary wheels linked with MKL. Accelerate is a system library, so that
does not
On 30/10/14 03:58, Sturla Molden wrote:
MKL has an API compatible with FFTW, so FFTW and MKL can be supported
with the same C code.
Compatible with big caveats:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/522278
Henry
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
[*] Actually, we could, but the binaries would be tainted with a viral
license.
And binaries linked with MKL are tainted by a proprietary license... They
have very similar effects,
The MKL license is proprietary but not viral.
Sturla
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
[*] Actually, we could, but the binaries would be tainted with a viral
license.
And binaries linked with MKL are tainted by a proprietary license... They
have very similar
On 30 Oct 2014 11:12, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
[*] Actually, we could, but the binaries would be tainted with a viral
license.
And binaries linked with MKL are tainted by a proprietary license...
They
have very similar effects,
I think that numpy.fft should be left there in its current state
(although perhaps as deprecated). Now scipy.fft should have a good generic
algorithm as default, and easily allow for different implementations to be
accessed through the same interface.
I also agree with the above. But I want to
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014 11:12, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
[*] Actually, we could, but the binaries would be tainted with a viral
license.
And binaries linked with MKL
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014 11:12, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
[*] Actually, we could, but the
