Re: [Numpy-discussion] test errors on deprecation/runtime warnings

2012-02-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
2012/2/17 Stéfan van der Walt > Hi Ralf > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > Last week we merged https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/201, which > causes > > DeprecationWarning's and RuntimeWarning's to be converted to errors if &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposed Roadmap Overview

2012-02-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Mark Wiebe and I have been discussing off and on (as well as talking with > Charles) a good way forward to balance two competing desires: > >* addition of new features that are needed in NumPy >* improving the code-base gen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposed Roadmap Overview

2012-02-19 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > All kidding aside, is your concern that when Mark starts this that no one > will be able to contribute until he is done? I can tell you right now that > won't be the case as I will be trying to flesh out issues with datetime64 > with him.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposed Roadmap Overview

2012-02-19 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:16 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, David Cournapeau >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Charles R Harris

Re: [Numpy-discussion] How a transition to C++ could work

2012-02-19 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Sturla Molden wrote: > Den 19.02.2012 16:45, skrev Adam Klein: > > > > Just to add, with respect to acceptable compilation times, a judicious > > choice of C++ features is critical. > > > > I use Python to avoid recompiling my code all the time. I don't > recompil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ABI status of Master

2012-02-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Hey all, > > >From what I can tell, the master branch is still ABI compatible with > NumPy 1.7. Is that true? > > I'd like to relabel the version of the master branch to 1.8.Does > anyone see any problems with that? > Before we branc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing pre-compiled f2py extensions on OSX

2012-02-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Mark Bakker wrote: > Two short questions: > > 1. When I distribute pre-compiled f2py extensions for OSX, it seems that > the users need gfortran installed, else it cannot find libgfortran.3.dylib. > Is there a way to link that file with the extension? > You can l

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problem Building Numpy with Python 2.7.1 and OS X 10.7.3

2012-02-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Patrick Armstrong wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm having a problem building NumPy on Python 2.7.1 and OS X 10.7.3. Here > is my build log: > > https://gist.github.com/1895377 > > Does anyone have any idea what might be happening? I get a very similar > error when compi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] distributing pre-compiled f2py extensions on OSX

2012-02-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Mark Bakker wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Ralf. > Can you point me a bit in the right direction. > Scipy is pretty big. > All Fortran sources in Scipy are wrapped with f2py, and can be compiled with gfortran the way you want. As a simple example, have a look at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problem Building Numpy with Python 2.7.1 and OS X 10.7.3

2012-02-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
ed it with clang. > > The issue #1500 (scipy) may help here. > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1500 > > > On 25.02.2012, at 14:14, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Since you're using pip, I assume that gcc-4.2 is llvm-gcc. As a first > step, I suggest using plain gcc

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 0.10.1 released

2012-02-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, I am pleased to announce the availability of SciPy 0.10.1. This is a maintenance release, with no new features compared to 0.10.0. Sources and binaries can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/scipy/0.10.1/, release notes are copied below. Enjoy, The SciPy developers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack License

2012-02-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > I just received word that NumPy has a license to use TeamCity and > YouTrack for NumPy development. > > YouTrack is a really nice issue tracker: > http://www.jetbrains.com/youtrack/ > > TeamCity is a really nice Continuous Integration syst

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Moving to gcc 4.* for win32 installers ?

2012-02-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:54 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ralf Gommers < > ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problem Building Numpy with Python 2.7.1 and OS X 10.7.3

2012-02-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Patrick Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > On 2012-02-25, at 5:14 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Since you're using pip, I assume that gcc-4.2 is llvm-gcc. As a first > step, I suggest using plain gcc and not using pip (so just "python setup.py

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Possible roadmap addendum: building better text file readers

2012-02-29 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Erin Sheldon wrote: > Excerpts from Nathaniel Smith's message of Wed Feb 29 13:17:53 -0500 2012: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Erin Sheldon > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Nathaniel Smith's message of Tue Feb 28 17:22:16 -0500 > 2012: > > >> > Even for binary,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Cygwin compile: fatal error: fenv/fenv.c:

2012-02-29 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Matt Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > I am getting the following error when running `python setup.py install` > for Numpy in Cygwin. This error happens on the latest as well as > the maintenance branched for 1.5 and 1.6. > This should fix it: http://projects.scipy.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Cygwin compile: fatal error: fenv/fenv.c

2012-02-29 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Matt Miller wrote: > More reading of the thread linked solved the issue. To reiterate, add > numpy/ and change .c to .h in line 590 of ieee754.c.src. > > Ex: > > elif defined(__CYGWIN__) >include "numpy/fenv/fenv.h" > endif > Thanks for confirming. Fixed i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Floating point "close" function?

2012-03-03 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Joe Kington wrote: > Is there a numpy function for testing floating point equality that returns > a boolean array? > > I'm aware of np.allclose, but I need a boolean array. Properly handling > NaN's and Inf's (as allclose does) would be a nice bonus. > > I wrote

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Floating point "close" function?

2012-03-03 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 13:59, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Joe Kington wrote: > >> > >> Is there a numpy function for testing floating point equality that >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data again

2012-03-03 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been thinking a lot about the masked array implementation lately. > I finally had the time to look hard at what has been done and now am of the > opinion that I do not think that 1.7 can be released with the current state >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test errors on deprecation/runtime warnings

2012-03-04 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > 2012/2/17 Stéfan van der Walt > >> Hi Ralf >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > Last week we merged https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/201, which >> ca

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Missing data again

2012-03-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Travis, > > Thanks for bringing this back up. > > Have you looked at the summary from the last thread? > https://github.com/njsmith/numpy/wiki/NA-discussion-statu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bus error for Debian / SPARC on current trunk

2012-03-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > I've pushed a bugfix to github, can you confirm that the crash goes away > on > > your test box? Thanks for tracking that down, the stack trace was very > > helpful. Since x86 mach

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Memory leak in numpy

2012-03-09 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, FRENK Andreas wrote: > Dear Community, > > > > I have an issue with numpy consuming more and more memory. > > According to ticket: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1427 > > > > This is a known issue. It should be fixed in 2.0.0.dev-9451260. What does > this

Re: [Numpy-discussion] addition, multiplication of a polynomial and np.{float, int}

2012-03-09 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote: > Hi Charles, > Le 07/03/2012 18:00, Charles R Harris a écrit : > > > > That's a good idea, I'll take care of it. Note the caveat about the > > coefficients going in the opposite direction. > Great ! In the mean time I changed a bit the root p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Commit PR 229 breaks build

2012-03-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > On my machines anyway. > > Running from numpy source directory. > non-existing path in 'numpy/distutils': 'site.cfg' > F2PY Version 2 > numpy/core/setup_common.py:86: MismatchCAPIWarning: API mismatch detected

Re: [Numpy-discussion] unique along axis?

2012-03-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > I see unique does not take an axis arg. > > Suggested way to apply unique to each column of a 2d array? > A for-loop? I'm guessing that there isn't an axis keyword because the number of unique elements per column may not be the same, so you

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Build error on OSX from commit 72c6fbd

2012-03-17 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > As of commit 72c6fbd, I am getting the appended build error on OSX > 10.6.8. I couldn't immediately see what might have caused the > problem. > I can't reproduce it, but it should be fixed by https://github.com/rgommers/numpy/commit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trouble building NumPy on PPC64

2012-03-20 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Andreas H. wrote: > Hi all, > > I have troube installing numpy in a virtual environment on a SuSE > Enterprise 11 server (ppc64). > > Here is what I did: > >curl -O https://raw.github.com/pypa/virtualenv/master/virtualenv.py >python virtualenv.py --distrib

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpydoc.traitsdoc error

2012-03-24 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Brad Buran wrote: > Not sure if this is the appropriate place to report the issue, but > I've been getting the following error when trying to build my docs > using Sphinx 1.1.3: > > File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\numpydoc\numpydoc.py", line 36, > in mangle_d

[Numpy-discussion] label NA and datetime as experimental

2012-03-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi, We decided to label both NA and datetime APIs as experimental for the 1.7.0 release. I made a PR that does this, please review: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/240 Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.sci

[Numpy-discussion] empty chararrays (ticket 1948)

2012-03-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi, In ticket 1948 a backwards compatibility issue with chararray is reported. Indexing a chararray with [] or a bool array of False used to return [] in numpy 1.2.1 (consistent with ndarray behavior), but now returns an empty string. Unfortunately this changed behavior has been present for the 1.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7 blockers

2012-03-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > There several problems with numpy master that need to be fixed before a > release can be considered. > >1. Datetime on windows with mingw. >2. Bus error on SPARC, ticket #2076. >3. NA a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7 blockers

2012-03-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Ralf Gommers < > ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] empty chararrays (ticket 1948)

2012-03-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ralf Gommers < > ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In ticket 1948 a backwards compatibility issue with chararray is >> reported. Indexing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpydoc.traitsdoc error

2012-03-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
ng list. Ralf > > Brad > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Brad Buran wrote: > >> > >> Not sure if this is the appropriate place to report the issue, but > >> I've

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7 blockers

2012-03-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > There several problems with numpy master that need to be fixed before a > release can be considered. > >1. Datetime on windows with mingw. >2. Bus error on SPARC, ticket #2076. >3. NA a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] label NA and datetime as experimental

2012-03-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Richard Hattersley > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> My team are currently experimenting with extending datetime to allow >> alternative, non-physical calendars (e.g. 360-day used by climate >> modellers). Once

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7 blockers

2012-03-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Testsuite fails with Python 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 (Debian)

2012-03-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > I've reported http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2085 and Ralf > asked for bringing that up here: is anyone able to replicate the > problem described in that ticket? > > The debian bug tracking the problem is: > http://bugs.debia

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Style for pad implementation in 'pad' namespace or functions under np.lib

2012-03-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Tim Cera wrote: > I have been developing a set of pad functions to pad arrays in different > ways. Really close to having it accepted into numpy, but I want to revisit > an implementation issue that I have become worried about. Should these > functions be collec

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Testsuite fails with Python 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 (Debian)

2012-04-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hi Ralf > sorry for the late reply. > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 22:29, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Sandro Tosi > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Testsuite fails with Python 2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 (Debian)

2012-04-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:32, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > Thanks. Can you explain what happens when running the tests? I don't > > understand why the log says "Fatal Python error...Aborted" and then it > &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > The idea is to allow people to test-out YouTrack for a few weeks and get > to know it while we migrate bugs to it. it looks like it is > straightforward to export the data out of YouTrack should we eventually > decide to use something e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac configuration tweak

2012-04-03 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Sorry, I saw the cross-posting to the NumPy list and wondered if we were > on the same page. > > I don't know of any plans to migrate SciPy Trac at this time: perhaps > later. > > At this time maybe, but I was assuming that if the Numpy m

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-03 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Maggie Mari wrote: > On 4/1/12 6:02 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > The interface looks good, but to get a feeling for how this would > > really work out I think admin rights are necessary. Then we can try > > out the command window (mass editing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bitwise operations and unsigned types

2012-04-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Travis Oliphant >> wrote: >> > That is an interesting point of view. I could see that point of >> view. >> > But, was this discussed as a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] empty chararrays (ticket 1948)

2012-04-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Keyword argument support for vectorize.

2012-04-08 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Michael McNeil Forbes < michael.for...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I added a simple enhancement patch to provide vectorize with simple > keyword argument support. (I added a new kwvectorize decorator, but > suspect this could/should easily be rolled into the exist

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-10 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Here some first impressions. > > > > The good: > > - It's responsive! > > - It remembers my preferences (view type, # of issues per page, etc.) > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bitwise operations and unsigned types

2012-04-10 Thread Ralf Gommers
hich > would help people figure out their code. > > Please speak up if you have another point of view? > I've opened http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2101 so we remember to do this before the 1.7 release. Ralf > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > On 4/10/12 2:40 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > >> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> > Here some first impressions. >> > >&g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andreas H. wrote: > Have you guys actually thought about JIRA? Atlassian offers free licences > for open source projects ... > Yes, http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/48224/match=jira Ralf ___ N

Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed

2012-04-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: >> >>> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7 blockers

2012-04-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > There several problems with numpy master that need to be fixed before a > release can be considered. > >1. Datetime on windows with mingw. > > Opened http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2108

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7 blockers

2012-04-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Charles R Harris > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> There

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removing masked arrays for 1.7? (Was 1.7 blockers)

2012-04-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
ional attributes on the > NumPy data-structure be included for long-term release. > > Best, > > -Travis > > > > > > On Mar 25, 2012, at 6:27 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removing masked arrays for 1.7? (Was 1.7 blockers)

2012-04-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Fernando Perez wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > That's the first time I've heard this. Until now, we have talked a lot > about > > adding bitmasks and API changes, not about complete removal. M

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-21 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Given the amount of new stuff coming in 1.7 and the slip in it's schedule, > I wonder if it would be worth putting out a 1.6.2 release with fixes for > einsum, ticket 1578, perhaps some others. My reasoning is that the fall >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Command-line options for (Windows) NumPy Installer?

2012-04-21 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Dave Fugate wrote: > Hi, is there any documentation available on exactly which command line > options are available from NumPy’s ‘superpack’ installers on Windows? > E.g., http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/install.html mentions an > “/arch” flag, but I’m not s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ralf Gommers < > ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP mask code and the 1.7 release

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in > master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it > is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to > give our users what they wa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Command-line options for (Windows) NumPy Installer?

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
hat we apparently didn't make. I opened http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2112 for this. Ralf > > --- > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:48:36 +0200 > From: Ralf Gommers > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Command-line options fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti: > >> > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib > >> promises a list of functions that does not app

Re: [Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:42 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > >> > Hi,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP mask code and the 1.7 release

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > >> We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What is consensus anyway

2012-04-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: > > Right now we are trying to balance difficult things: stable releases > with experimental development. > > Perhaps a more formal "development release" system could help here. > II

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What is consensus anyway

2012-04-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:37 AM, srean wrote: > > On something else that was brought up: I do not consider myself > competent/prepared enough to take on development, but it is not the > case that I have _never_ felt the temptation. What I have found > intimidating and styming is the perceived pol

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What is consensus anyway

2012-04-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralf Gommers > > >> Perhaps a more formal "development release" system could help here. > >> IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things: > > > This is a good idea -

[Numpy-discussion] 1.6.2 release - backports and MSVC testing help

2012-04-30 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2, see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have a look at those PRs to see and comment on what's proposed to go into 1.6.2. I also have a request for help with testing: can someone who uses M

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.6.2 release - backports and MSVC testing help

2012-04-30 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2, > > see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.6.2 release - backports and MSVC testing help

2012-05-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
weeks after that. Cheers, Ralf > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 22:16, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2, > see > > PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issue Tracking

2012-05-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > >> >> On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >> >> On 4/30/12 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> >> We have been doing some investigation of various a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issue Tracking

2012-05-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > 01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: > [clip] > > At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want > > to solve: > > 1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have) > > No

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1

2012-05-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of NumPy 1.6.2. This is a maintenance release. Due to the delay of the NumPy 1.7.0, this release contains far more fixes than a regular NumPy bugfix release. It also includes a number of documentation and build improveme

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy doc for percentile function

2012-05-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Pierre Haessig > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking for the entry point in Numpy doc for the percentile function. >> I'm assuming it should sit in routines.statistics but do not see it : >> http://docs.scipy.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issue Tracking

2012-05-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ralf Gommers < > ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> > &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is NumpyDotNet (aka numpy-refactor) likely to be merged into the mainline?

2012-05-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Seth Nickell wrote: > With a little work, I think numpy/scipy could be very useful to those > of us who have to program on .NET for one reason or another, but > 64-bit is currently not supported (at least, not as released). > > I'm considering working out 64-bit su

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issue Tracking

2012-05-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > On May 5, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extension types repository

2012-05-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > +1 > > Travis > > -- > Travis Oliphant > (on a mobile) > 512-826-7480 > > > On May 5, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > All, > > Tom Aldcroft volunteered to bring quaternions into numpy. The proposal is > to set up a separat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to run NumPy's tests with coverage?

2012-05-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure out how to run NumPy's tests with coverage enabled > (i.e. > numpy.test(coverage=True) ). I can run the tests successfully like this: > This seems to have been broken somewhere along the way. If you remove the argum

Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to run NumPy's tests with coverage?

2012-05-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:25 AM, wrote: > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm trying to figure out how to run NumPy'

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Documentation roles in the numpy/scipy documentation editor

2012-05-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Tim Cera wrote: > I think we should change the roles established for the Numpy/Scipy > documentation editors because they do not work as intended. > > For reference they are described here: > http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/Front%20Page/ > > Basically there aren't that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue)

2012-05-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:26 PM, T J wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > >>> > >>> 11.05.2012 17:54, Frédéric Bastien kirjoitti: > >>> > In The

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1

2012-05-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > On 06.05.2012, at 8:16AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote: > > > All tests for 1.6.2rc1 pass on > > Mac OS X 10.7.3 > > python 2.7.2 > > gcc 4.2 (Apple) > > Passing as well on 10.6 x86_64 and on 10.5.8 ppc with

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1

2012-05-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Paul Anton Letnes < > paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm getting a couple of errors when testing. System: >> Arch Linux (updated today) >> Python 3.2.3 >> gcc 4.7.0 >> (Anything else

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1

2012-05-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate > of > > NumPy 1.6.2. This is a maintena

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1

2012-05-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Paul Anton Letnes < > paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm getting a couple of errors when testing. System: >> Arch Linux (updated today) >> Python 3.2.3 >> gcc 4.7.0 >> (Anything else

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1

2012-05-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Paul Anton Letnes < paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Charles R Harris > > wrote: > >> > >> >

[Numpy-discussion] Debian/Ubuntu patch help (was: ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1)

2012-05-15 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm pleased to annou

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Debian/Ubuntu patch help (was: ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1)

2012-05-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, if there's anyone wants to have a look at the above issue this > > week, > >that would be great. > > > If there's a patch by this weekend I can create a second RC, so we can > > still have the final rel

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should arr.diagonal() return a copy or a view? (1.7 compatibility issue)

2012-05-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add the > > flag for people that want to use it. > > > > Why? > > > > 1) There is probably >10k script

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Debian/Ubuntu patch help (was: ANN: NumPy 1.6.2 release candidate 1)

2012-05-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor > > wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, if there's anyone wants

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Debian/Ubuntu patch help

2012-05-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 05/16/2012 09:01 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Julian Taylor > > mailto:jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com>> > > wrote: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [numpy.testing] re-import when using coverage

2012-05-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Fabrice Silva wrote: > > maybe it's this > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/49785/focus=49787 > Thanks for your reply, Not sure it is the same trouble, I'll have a > deeper look at that thread... > > Both coverage=True and coverage=Fals

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [numpy.testing] re-import when using coverage

2012-05-17 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Fabrice Silva wrote: > Le mercredi 16 mai 2012 à 22:58 +0200, Ralf Gommers a écrit : > > > Both coverage=True and coverage=False work with your attached package. > > But it seems you attached an old version, because test_a.py doesn't >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [numpy.testing] re-import when using coverage

2012-05-17 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Fabrice Silva wrote: > Nautilus and file-roller are *** on me... > I hope this one is good. > Thanks for being patient :) > That was the right tar file. The issue was the one Josef was pointing too (cover-inclusive), which has already been fixed in https://github

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >