Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy-1.11.0.dev0 windows wheels compiled with mingwpy available

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote: > On 23/10/15 02:14, Robert McGibbon wrote: > > The original goal was to get MS to pay for this, on the theory that > > they should be cleaning up their own messes, but after 6 months of > > back-and-forth we've pretty much

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ian Henriksen < insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:14 AM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> That would be quite useful I think. 32/64-bit issues are mostly >> orthogonal to p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop providing official win32 downloads (for now)

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ralf Gommers >> >> +1 from me. Despite the number of downloads still being high, I don't >> think there's too much value in these binaries anymore

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PR for complex np.interp, question about assert_almost_equal

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Peter Creasey < p.e.creasey...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I submitted a PR (#6872) for using complex numbers in np.lib.interp. > > The tests pass on my machine, but I see that the TravisCI builds are > giving assertion fails (on my own test) with python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Ian Henriksen < insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it >> would be easy to add win32? >> > > It'd be really easy to add 32 bit builds. The main reason I didn't was > because appveyor

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Just checking if someone has already registered numpy on appveyor. If not, > I intend to rename my personal account. Note that as AFAICT, someone has to > be the admin for appveyor, and that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: On Dec 20, 2015 12:23 PM, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.go

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop providing official win32 downloads (for now)

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Ian Henriksen < insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:27 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Dec 18, 2015 2:22 PM, "Ian Henriksen" < >> insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > An appveyor setup is a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop providing official win32 downloads (for now)

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm wondering what people think of the idea of us (= numpy) stopping >> providing our "official" win32 builds

Re: [Numpy-discussion] When to stop supporting Python 2.6?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > drop 2.6 > > I still don't understand why folks insist that they need to run a (very)) > old python on an old OS, but need the latest and greatest numpy. > > Chuck's list was pretty long and compelling. > > -CHB > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removiing 1.10.0 and 1.10.1 from sourceforge and pypi

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Nov 13, 2015 10:06 AM, "Charles R Harris" >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I think 1.10.0

Re: [Numpy-discussion] loadtxt and usecols

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > My personal rule for flexible inputs like that is that it should be > encouraged so long as it does not introduce ambiguity. Furthermore, > Allowing a scalar as an input doesn't add a congitive disconnect on the > user

Re: [Numpy-discussion] New behavior of allclose

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > This is to open a discussion of a change of behavior of `np.allclose`. > That function uses `isclose` in numpy 1.10 with the result that array > subtypes are preserved whereas before they were not.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] querying backend information

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Stefan Seefeld > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is there a way to query Numpy for information about backends (BLAS, > > LAPACK, etc.) that it was compiled against, including

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy style docstring support in Sphinx and PyCharm

Hi all, Just noticed this: http://sphinx-doc.org/latest/ext/napoleon.html http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/whatsnew/index.html#GDocstrings Slowly conquering the docstring world:) Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Warren Weckesser < >> warr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Warren Weckesser < warren.weckes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Apparently it is not well known that if you have a Python project >> source tree (e.g., a numpy checkout), then

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Warren Weckesser < > warren.weckes...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumFOCUS fiscal sponsorship agreement

Hi all, On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, there wasn't much feedback on this FSA, but I want to point out > that it's actually quite important for the project. > > Maybe everyone already thought about this when

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumFOCUS fiscal sponsorship agreement

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Oct 31, 2015 4:01 PM, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.co

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumFOCUS fiscal sponsorship agreement

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > >&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Commit rights for Jonathan J. Helmus

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Hi all, > > Jonathan J. Helmus (@jjhelmus) has been given commit rights -- let's all > welcome him aboard. > Welcome Jonathan! And thanks for tackling the numpy.ma backlog in the issue tracker - it can certainly use some

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumFOCUS fiscal sponsorship agreement

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks Nathaniel and everyone else who contributed for pushing forward > with formalizing Numpy governance and with this FSA. I'm quite excited > about both! > > Before I start comm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > please, pretty please, do not disable setup.py install or at least > keep providing a way for distribution (Debian in this case) to be able > to build/install numpy in a temporary location for packaging reasons. > pip is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > [...] > > I believe that this would also break both 'easy_install numpy', and > > attempts to install numpy via the setup_requires= argument to > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: Updating this list for comments made after I sent it and now that I've looked in more detail at what the less common commands do: > So if/when we accept the proposal in this thread, I'm thinking we shou

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:28 PM, wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Oct 27, 2015 6:08 AM, wrote: >> > >> [...] >> > >> > >> > What's the equivalent of >> > python setup.py build_ext

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

inters. Since there is a *ton* of > material online telling us *to use* python setup.py install, all the time, > it would be extremely helpful for the community if discussions such as this > one helped to bubble up the Right Way of doing Python packaging and > distribution. > > Tha

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Scipy 0.16.1 release

Hi all, I'm happy to announce the availability of the Scipy 0.16.1 release. This is a bugfix only release; it contains no new features compared to 0.16.0. The sources and binary installers can be found at: - Source tarballs: at https://github.com/scipy/scipy/releases and on PyPi. - OS

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.1 released.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> I'm actually not sure if anyone even uses the 32 bit builds at all :-) >> > There's a lot of 32 bit python use out there still, including

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumFOCUS fiscal sponsorship agreement

Hi, Thanks Nathaniel and everyone else who contributed for pushing forward with formalizing Numpy governance and with this FSA. I'm quite excited about both! Before I start commenting on the FSA, I'd like to point out that I'm both on the numpy steering committee and the NumFOCUS board. I don't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.10 and development version docs

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > Bokeh also uses TravisCI, and we automatically build deploy docs on "dev" > builds and releases, using encrypted Travis variables to store the > necessary credentials. In case any of that sounds useful, most of the

[Numpy-discussion] 1.10 and development version docs

Hi, I see that there are no docs for 1.10 on docs.scipy.org yet, and the development version docs are from Nov'14. Anyone with permissions want to look at rectifying that situation? Also, building development version docs on TravisCI after each merge would be useful (for Numpy and Scipy). A

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Oops - maybe post3 numpy file?

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 8, 2015 5:39 PM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Sebastian Berg sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote: On So, 2015-08-16 at 14:04 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, While waiting for Christoph to drop the other shoe on 1.10.0b1, I thought I'd try again to start a discussion on the 1.11 release. If we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems using add_npy_pkg_config

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Christian Engwer christian.eng...@uni-muenster.de wrote: Dear Ralf, I stared at it for a while, and can't figure it out despite you following the example in the add_npy_pkg_config docstring pretty much to the letter. When you see that the error is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems using add_npy_pkg_config

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Christian Engwer christian.eng...@uni-muenster.de wrote: Dear Ralf, I stared at it for a while, and can't figure it out despite you following the example

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Development workflow (not git tutorial)

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: 15.08.2015, 01:44, Chris Barker kirjoitti: [clip] numpy doesn't use namespace packages, so develop mode works there. The develop mode is mainly useful with a virtualenv. Otherwise, you install work-in-progress development

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems using add_npy_pkg_config

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Christian Engwer christian.eng...@uni-muenster.de wrote: This doesn't answer your question but: why? If you're not distributing a Python project, there is no reason to use distutils instead of a sane build system. Come on. We don't take it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems using add_npy_pkg_config

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Christian Engwer christian.eng...@uni-muenster.de wrote: Dear all, I'm trying to use the numpy distutils to install native C libraries. These are part of a larger roject and should be usable standalone. I managed to install headers and libs, but now I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems using add_npy_pkg_config

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Christian Engwer christian.eng...@uni-muenster.de wrote: Dear all, I'm trying to use

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy-vendor cythonize problem

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: I note that current numpy-vendor fails to cythonize in windows builds. Cython is installed, but I assume it needs to also be installed in each of the python versions in wine. Because the need to cythonize was

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.10.x is branched

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Numpy 1.10.x is branched. There is still some cleanup to do before the alpha release, but that should be coming in a couple of days. http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion Thanks

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: PyWavelets 0.3.0 release

and install PyWavelets are supported now. Authors === * Ankit Agrawal + * François Boulogne + * Ralf Gommers + * David Menéndez Hurtado + * Gregory R. Lee + * David McInnis + * Helder Oliveira + * Filip Wasilewski * Kai Wohlfahrt + A total of 9 people contributed to this release. People

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Scipy 0.16.0 release

Carey * George Castillo + * Alex Conley + * Liam Damewood + * Rupak Das + * Abraham Escalante + * Matthias Feurer + * Eric Firing + * Clark Fitzgerald * Chad Fulton * André Gaul * Andreea Georgescu + * Christoph Gohlke * Andrey Golovizin + * Ralf Gommers * J.J. Green + * Alex Griffing * Alexander

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Scipy 0.16.0 release candidate 1

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of Scipy 0.16.0. Please try it out and report any issues on the Github issue tracker or on the scipy-dev mailing list. This first RC is a source-only release. Sources and release notes can be found at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Readings about governance and decision making for F/OSS projects

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 4, 2015 1:47 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: If you have other links on this topic that you are think are interesting, please add them to the thread! As promised, here some links about fiscal sponsorship.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Honi Sanders h...@brandeis.edu wrote: I’m interested in listening in just to see what it’s like, but I have to leave after ~15 minutes because I have a meeting at 4:30. Is that too disruptive? Don't worry about it, just join as long as you can. Ralf

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jeff Reback jeffreb...@gmail.com wrote: you guys have an agenda? I'm guessing a subset of what's listed on https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/SciPy-2015-developer-meeting Would indeed be good to make a proper agenda, so we can prepare properly for the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarification sought on Scipy Numpy version requirements.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote: Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: I'm looking to change some numpy deprecations into errors as well as

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarification sought on Scipy Numpy version requirements.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Ralf

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarification sought on Scipy Numpy version requirements.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I'm looking to change some numpy deprecations into errors as well as remove some deprecated functions. The problem I see is that SciPy claims to support Numpy = 1.5 and Numpy 1.5 is really, really,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarification sought on Scipy Numpy version requirements.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:05 PM

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removal of Deprecated Keywords/functionality

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Honi Sanders h...@brandeis.edu wrote: OK. So I am in the midst of a pull request adding a “maxlag” mode to correlate ( https://github.com/numpy/numpy/compare/master...bringingheavendown:maxlag). Am I to understand that I no longer need to preserve the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarification sought on Scipy Numpy version requirements.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: That's code that was only introduced for 0.16.x; a ``git clean -xdf`` should fix this for you. Next obstacle: I think it'll

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarification sought on Scipy Numpy version requirements.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like Scipy 0.13.3 is OK against master apart from a bunch of runtime errors due to deprecation warnings, Note

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Verify your sourceforge windows installer downloads

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: Speaking from the matplotlib project, our binaries are substantial due to our suite of test images. Pypi worked with us on relaxing size constraints. Also, I think the new cheese shop/warehouse server they are using scales

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Backwards-incompatible improvements to numpy.random.RandomState

Isaac On 5/24/2015 4:59 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: the reasoning on this point is shaky. np.random.seed() is *very* widely used, and works fine for a test suite where each test that needs random numbers calls seed(...) and is run with nose. Can you explain why you need to touch the behavior

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Backwards-incompatible improvements to numpy.random.RandomState

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Antony Lee antony@berkeley.edu wrote: Hi, As mentioned in #1450: Patch with Ziggurat method for Normal distribution #5158: ENH: More efficient algorithm for unweighted random choice without replacement #5299: using `random.choice` to sample integers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Backwards-incompatible improvements to numpy.random.RandomState

. On May 24, 2015 2:03 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Antony Lee antony@berkeley.edu wrote: Hi, As mentioned in #1450: Patch with Ziggurat method for Normal distribution #5158: ENH: More efficient algorithm for unweighted random

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Scipy 0.16.0 beta release 2

Hi all, The second beta for Scipy 0.16.0 is now available. After beta 1 a couple of critical issues on Windows were solved, and there are now also 32-bit Windows binaries (along with the sources and release notes) available on https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/scipy/0.16.0b2/. Please

Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: There's the switch to OpenBLAS and building the right selection mechanism for which arch to use: http://article.gmane.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com

Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: Hi folks., I did a little intro to scipy session as part of a larger Python class the other day, and was dismayed to find that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, unfortunately we can't put MKL binaries on pypi because of the MKL license - see

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Scipy 0.16.0 beta 1 release

* Steven Byrnes * CJ Carey * George Castillo + * Alex Conley + * Liam Damewood + * Rupak Das + * Abraham Escalante + * Matthias Feurer + * Eric Firing + * Clark Fitzgerald * Chad Fulton * André Gaul * Andreea Georgescu + * Christoph Gohlke * Andrey Golovizin + * Ralf Gommers * J.J. Green + * Alex

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy vendor repo

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Done in the master branch of https://github.com/rgommers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy vendor repo

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 accepted students for Scipy/Numpy

Hi all, Google has just announced which students got accepted for this year's GSoC. For Scipy these are: - Nikolay Mayorov, Improve nonlinear least squares minimization functionality in SciPy mentors: Chuck Evgeni - Abraham Escalante, SciPy: scipy.stats improvements mentor: Ralf (Evgeni is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Automatic number of bins for numpy histograms

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Varun nayy...@gmail.com wrote: http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/nayyarv/matplotlib/blob/master/examples/sta tistics/A

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal)

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: To address in detail the list of Matthew you mention above: * implement orthogonal indexing as a method arr.sensible_index[...] That's

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal)

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote: On 2015/04/08 8:09 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote: That analogy fails because it suggests a private conversation. This list is extremely public. For example, I am just a user, and I am on it. I can tell you that as a long-time

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release again.

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10. Good idea. If you're going to do this, it may be helpful to create a new 1.10 milestone and keep but clean up the 1.10 blockers milestone so there

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: But, the real problem here is that we have two different array duck types that force everyone to write their code twice. This is a terrible state of affairs! (And exactly analogous to the problems caused by np.ndarray

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote: There was no break as large as this. In fact I would say this is even a larger change than any individual change we saw in the python 2 to 3 switch. Well, the impact of what Python3 did to everyone's string handling code caused

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephan, all, On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: It's great to see that this year there are a lot

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, It's great to see that this year there are a lot of students interested in doing a GSoC project with Numpy or Scipy. So far five proposals have been submitted, and it looks like several more are being

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Improve Numpy Datetime Functionality for Gsoc

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote: The most recent discussion about datetime64 was back in March and April of last year: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2014-March/thread.html#69554

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Improve Numpy Datetime Functionality for Gsoc

, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Saprative and Smruti, Sorry for the slow reply, I overlooked this thread. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/53805 and the discussion that followed (also linked from the ideas page) should give you some idea of what

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Improve Numpy Datetime Functionality for Gsoc

this list. You'll get the most feedback on this list, so please ask relevant technical questions here. If you have further questions on administrative questions that you prefer to not post in public, you can email me privately. Cheers, Ralf On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Improve Numpy Datetime Functionality for Gsoc

Hi Saprative and Smruti, Sorry for the slow reply, I overlooked this thread. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/53805 and the discussion that followed (also linked from the ideas page) should give you some idea of what is required. If you want to start working on a patch I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Asking proposal review/feedback for GSOC 15

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Oğuzhan Ünlü cengoguzhanu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nikolay, Thanks for pointing out that! It really helped. I think it looks better and easier to review now. I appreciate any comment/feedback. My proposal is at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC projects

Hi Lulu, welcome! On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Lulu Li c...@alum.mit.edu wrote: My apology if I am posting to the wrong mailing list. I am interested in NumPy project ideas for Google Summer of Code 2015 as posted here https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-project-ideas. In particular,

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

Hi all, It's great to see that this year there are a lot of students interested in doing a GSoC project with Numpy or Scipy. So far five proposals have been submitted, and it looks like several more are being prepared now. I'd like to give you a bit of advice as well as an idea of what's going to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: It's great to see that this year there are a lot of students interested in doing a GSoC project with Numpy or Scipy. So far five proposals have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Rewrite np.histogram in c?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Daniel da Silva var.mail.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Hope this isn't too off-topic: but it would be very nice if np.histogram and np.histogram2d supported masked arrays. Is this out of scope for outside the numpy.ma package? Right now it looks like there's no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Asking proposal review/feedback for GSOC 15

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Oğuzhan Ünlü cengoguzhanu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My name is Oğuzhan(You may use 'Oguzhan'). I submitted a proposal on the system with the title 'NumPy - Vector math library integration'. Ralf commented on my proposal and advised to ask for a feedback on

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Charles

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Introductory mail and GSoc Project Vector math library integration

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Dp Docs sdpa...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Daπid davidmen...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2015 at 16:51, Dp Docs sdpa...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote: There

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Time to start thinking about numpy 1.10. Sounds good. Do we have a volunteer for release manager already? At the moment there are 21 blockers and 93 PRs. it would be good if we could prioritize

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linalg.norm probems

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:11 PM,

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

Hi all, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, It's time to start preparing for this year's Google Summer of Code. There is actually one urgent thing to be done (before 19.00 UTC today), which is to get our ideas page in decent shape

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 prep - ideas page

Hi all, It's time to start preparing for this year's Google Summer of Code. There is actually one urgent thing to be done (before 19.00 UTC today), which is to get our ideas page in decent shape. It doesn't have to be final, but there has to be enough on there for the organizers to judge it. This

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Google Summer of Code and NumFOCUS

Hi Raniere, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Raniere Silva rani...@ime.unicamp.br wrote: Hi, NumFOCUS has promotes and supports the ongoing research and development of open-source computing tools including NumPy. This year NumFOCUS want to try be a Google Summer of Code umbrella

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Silent Broadcasting considered harmful

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote: So maybe the better way would be not to add warnings to braodcasting operations, but to overhaul the matrix class to make it more attractive for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] new mingw-w64 based numpy and scipy wheel (still experimental)

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for all your ideas. The next version will contain an augumented libopenblas.dll in both numpy and scipy. On the long term I would prefer an external openblas wheel package, if there is an agreement about this

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >