Re: [Numpy-discussion] performance of numpy.array()

2015-04-29 Thread Nick Papior Andersen
You could try and install your own numpy to check whether that resolves the problem. 2015-04-29 17:40 GMT+02:00 simona bellavista afy...@gmail.com: on cluster A 1.9.0 and on cluster B 1.8.2 2015-04-29 17:18 GMT+02:00 Nick Papior Andersen nickpap...@gmail.com: Compile it yourself to know

Re: [Numpy-discussion] performance of numpy.array()

2015-04-29 Thread Nick Papior Andersen
Compile it yourself to know the limitations/benefits of the dependency libraries. Otherwise, have you checked which versions of numpy they are, i.e. are they the same version? 2015-04-29 17:05 GMT+02:00 simona bellavista afy...@gmail.com: I work on two distinct scientific clusters. I have run

[Numpy-discussion] PR, extended site.cfg capabilities

2015-02-24 Thread Nick Papior Andersen
Dear all, I have initiated a PR-5597 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/5597, which enables the reading of new flags from the site.cfg file. @rgommers requested that I posted some information on this site, possibly somebody could test it on their setup. So the PR basically enables reading these

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PR, extended site.cfg capabilities

2015-02-24 Thread Nick Papior Andersen
2015-02-24 14:31 GMT+01:00 Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com: On 02/24/2015 02:16 PM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote: Dear all, I have initiated a PR-5597 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/5597, which enables the reading of new flags from the site.cfg file. @rgommers requested

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PR, extended site.cfg capabilities

2015-02-24 Thread Nick Papior Andersen
2015-02-24 14:56 GMT+01:00 Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com: On 02/24/2015 02:31 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: On 02/24/2015 02:16 PM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote: Dear all, I have initiated a PR-5597 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/5597, which enables the reading of new flags