Re: [Numpy-discussion] The process I intend to follow for any proposed changes to NumPy

Hi Travis, On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Hey all, > > I just wanted to clarify, that I am very excited about a few ideas I have > --- but I don't have time myself to engage in the community process to get > these changes into NumPy. However,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [RFC] should we argue for a matrix power operator, @@?

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Aron Ahmadia a...@ahmadia.net wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: The thread so far, it sounds like the consensus answer is meh, whatever.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] argsort speed

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM

Re: [Numpy-discussion] argsort speed

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: On 17.02.2014 15:18, Francesc Alted wrote: On 2/17/14, 1:08 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for False convention

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: I see, that makes sense. So to remember this, the rule is: Specify elements that you want to get masked using True in 'mask'. Yes

[Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for False convention

Hi, What is the rationale for using False in 'mask' for elements that should be included? http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/maskedarray.generic.html As opposed to using True for elements that should be included, which is what I was intuitively expecting when I started using the masked

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Masked arrays: Rationale for False convention

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote: On 2013/09/30 4:05 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.1 release

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote: Hi, A big thanks for that release. I also think it would be useful to do a release candidate about this. This release changed the behavior releated to python long and broke a test in Theano. Nothing important, but we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.1 release

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the final NumPy 1.7.1 release. Sources and binary installers can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/ Only three simple bugs were

Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 1970 issue

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Sebastian Berg sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote: On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 09:07 -0700, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Zachary Ploskey

Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 1970 issue

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com wrote: It would seem that before 1970 the dates do not include the time zone adjustment while after 1970 they do. This is the source of the extra 7 hours. In [21]: np.datetime64('1970-01-01 00') Out[21]:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] datetime64 1970 issue

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Bob Nnamtrop bob.nnamt...@gmail.com wrote: I am curious if others have noticed an issue with datetime64 at the beginning of 1970. First: In [144]: (np.datetime64('1970-01-01') - np.datetime64('1969-12-31')) Out[144]: numpy.timedelta64(1,'D') OK this look

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.1 release

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the final NumPy 1.7.1 release. Sources and binary installers can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/ Only three simple bugs were fixed since 1.7.1rc1 (#3166, #3179, #3187). I would like to thank everybody who

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.1rc1 release

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Yes. I created an issue here for them to test it: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/1809 Just to make sure. There doesn't seem to be any more problems, so I am releasing 1.7.1 now. Ondrej

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

Hi Matthew, On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ondrej, On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.1rc1 release

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of NumPy 1.7.1rc1. Sources and binary installers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.7.1

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: The Numpy 1.7.1 release process seems to have stalled. My apologies for that. What do we need to finish up to get it going again? I think it would be nice to shoot for a release maybe the weekend after next.

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.1rc1 release

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of NumPy 1.7.1rc1. Sources and binary installers can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1rc1/ Please test it and report any bugs. It fixes a few bugs, listed below. I would like to thank

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scheduling the 1.7.1 and 1.8 releases

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, There are now some 14 non-merge commits in the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7.1

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: When should we put out 1.7.1? Discuss ;)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] a question about freeze on numpy 1.7.0

Hi Gelin, On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Gelin Yan dynami...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All When I used numpy 1.7.0 with cx_freeze 4.3.1 on windows, I quickly found out even a simple import numpy may lead to program failed with following exception: AttributeError: 'module' object has no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Package: scipy-0.11.0-0.1.rc2.fc18 Tag: f18-updates-candidate Status: failed Built by: orion

Orion, On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: On 09/21/2012 11:41 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: Hi Orion, On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: This is a plea for some help. We've been having trouble getting scipy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to upload to pypi

Hi Robert, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have uploaded the NumPy 1.7.0 source distribution to pypi: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/numpy/1.7.0 I did

Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to upload to pypi

David, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have uploaded the NumPy 1.7.0 source distribution to pypi: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/numpy/1.7.0 I did it by uploading

[Numpy-discussion] How to upload to pypi

Hi, I have uploaded the NumPy 1.7.0 source distribution to pypi: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/numpy/1.7.0 I did it by uploading the file PKG-INFO from numpy-1.7.0.tar.gz. It said Error processing form. Form Failure; reset form submission about 3x times, but on the 4th try it went through. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: I think you will need a developer's license for MKL

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build? That doesn't sound like a good idea to me. I must say I'm a little

[Numpy-discussion] Modern Fortran vs NumPy syntax

Hi, I have recently setup a page about modern Fortran: http://fortran90.org/ and in particular, it has a long section with side by side syntax examples of Python/NumPy vs Fortran: http://fortran90.org/src/rosetta.html I would be very interested if some NumPy gurus would provide me feedback. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Modern Fortran vs NumPy syntax

Frédéric, On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote: Hi, I just read a paper[1] that compare python with numpy or pypy vs c++ and fortran from a code, memory and speed point of view. The python code was still better as you can't have list of ndarray in fortran

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: pandas 0.10.1 is released

Hi Wes, On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote: hi all, We've released pandas 0.10.1 which includes many bug fixes from 0.10.0 (including a number of issues with the new file parser, e.g. reading multiple files in separate threads), various performance

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0rc2 release

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of NumPy 1.7.0rc2. Sources and binary installers can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0rc2/ We have fixed all issues known to us since the 1.7.0rc1 release. Please test this release

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: [...] Can you clarify the people you think will get stuck? I think I'm right in saying that anyone with a C extension should be able to build them against numpy,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

Christoph, On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: [...] In order not to leave this discussion without a resolution: Christophe - would you allow us to distribute your numpy binaries for 1.7 from the numpy sourceforge page? Cheers, Matthew I am OK with

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Will numpy 1.7.0 final be binary compatible with the rc?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Will numpy 1.7.0 final be binary compatible with the rc?

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello all, Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compatible with the release candidate(s)? i.e. Would it be safe for me to release a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:57 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:28 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I see there is no Windows 64 bit installer for the 1.7 rc1. related:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:57 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:28 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 2/4/2013 12:59 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:57 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Travis failures with no errors

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I found these recent weird failures

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, no problem. For the part that needs to be built on 10.6 that is. Vincent's box still has 10.5, right? Yes. Ondrej ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: Ondřej, Vincent, and Ralf (and others..) Thank you so much for doing all this -- it's a great service to the MacPython community. Chris, thank you for your help as well! Ondrej

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building Numpy 1.6.2 for Python 3.3 on Windows

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, klo klo...@gmail.com wrote: Actually, this isn't over. It builds fine, but when I try to import numpy I get error: ... Sorry for the noise, after re-reading tracelog, I realized that I accidentally removed

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.commandlinefu.com/commands/view/2031/install-an-mpkg-from-the-command-line-on-osx This requires root access

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Ondřej Čertík

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Which exact Python do we need to use on Mac? Do we need to use the binary installer from python.org? Yes, the one from

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Currently the NumPy binaries are built using the pavement.py script, which uses the following Pythons: MPKG_PYTHON

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to install the dmg images without root access from the command line? I've never tried, but it looks like you can

[Numpy-discussion] Which Python to use for Mac binaries

Hi, Currently the NumPy binaries are built using the pavement.py script, which uses the following Pythons: MPKG_PYTHON = { 2.5: [/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/bin/python], 2.6: [/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/bin/python], 2.7:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] test failures when embedded (in matlab)

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Robin robi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, When using Numpy from an embedded Python (Python embedded in a Matlab mex function) I get a lot of test failures (see attached log). I am using CentOS 6.3, distribution packaged Python (2.6) and Numpy (1.4.1). Running

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0rc1 release

Hi Neal, On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Are release notes available? Yes. There are here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0rc1/ if you slide the page down a little bit (sf.net just shows the file README.txt). I am posting them

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0rc1 release

Hi Christoph, On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: Looks good so far. I tested numpy-MKL-1.7.0rc1.win-amd64-py2.7 with some packages that were compiled with numpy 1.6.x

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0rc1 release

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of NumPy 1.7.0rc1. Sources and binary installers can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0rc1/ We have fixed all issues known to us since the 1.7.0b2 release. The only remaining issue is a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Many failing doctests - release blocker? Enable for default test runs?

Hi Matthew, On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I noticed that enabling the doctests on the 1.7.x maintenance branch caused lots and lots of doctest failures. (np-devel)[mb312@blair ~/dev_trees]$ python -c 'import numpy as np;

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help with f2py

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Aronne Merrelli aronne.merre...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to run f2py and running into some trouble. Starting from http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/F2Py, and the very simple 'Wrapping Hermite Polynomial' example, I can get the pyf file created with no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Travis-CI stopped supporting Python 3.1, but added 3.3

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I noticed that the 3.1 tests are now failing. After clarification with the Travis guys: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/travis-ci

[Numpy-discussion] Travis-CI stopped supporting Python 3.1, but added 3.3

Hi, I noticed that the 3.1 tests are now failing. After clarification with the Travis guys: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/travis-ci/02iRu6kmwY8/discussion I've submitted a fix to our .travis.yml (and backported to 1.7): https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2850

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Travis failures with no errors

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I found these recent weird failures in Travis, but I can't find any problem with the log and all tests pass. Any ideas what is going on? https://travis-ci.org/numpy/numpy/jobs/3570123 https://travis-ci.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch

Hi Travis, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Hello all, There is a lot happening in my life right now and I am spread quite thin among the various projects that I take an interest in. In particular, I am thrilled to publicly announce on this

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Future of numpy (was: DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch)

Hi Matthew, On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, [Travis wrote...] My strong suggestion is that development discussions of the project continue on this list with consensus among the active participants being the goal for development. I don't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Future of numpy (was: DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch)

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthew, On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, [Travis wrote...] My strong suggestion is that development discussions of the project continue on this list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

the bug is still marked open? At least fixed in 1.7.x? On 15 Dec 2012 23:52, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, If you go to the issues for 1.7 and click high priority: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?labels=priority%3A+highmilestone=3state=open you will see 3 issues

[Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

Hi, If you go to the issues for 1.7 and click high priority: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?labels=priority%3A+highmilestone=3state=open you will see 3 issues as of right now. Two of those have PR attached. It's been a lot of work to get to this point and I'd like to thank all of you for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure in test_iterator.py at Travis

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: I only checked this build: https://secure.travis-ci.org/#!/certik/numpy/jobs/3656960 But that log clearly shows 'python setup.py install' being used instead of 'pip install'. How certain are you that your branch actually

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure in test_iterator.py at Travis

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: The top of the build log has the actual git command they used to check out the source - it's some clever GitHub thing that gives the same thing as pressing the green button would iirc. You could copy the commands from the

[Numpy-discussion] Travis failures with no errors

Hi, I found these recent weird failures in Travis, but I can't find any problem with the log and all tests pass. Any ideas what is going on? https://travis-ci.org/numpy/numpy/jobs/3570123 https://travis-ci.org/numpy/numpy/jobs/3539549 https://travis-ci.org/numpy/numpy/jobs/3369629 Ondrej

[Numpy-discussion] Failure in test_iterator.py at Travis

Hi, Another weird bug sometimes happen in numpy/core/tests/test_iterator.py, it looks like this: == FAIL: test_iterator.test_iter_array_cast -- Traceback (most

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure in test_iterator.py at Travis

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Another weird bug sometimes happen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Trac migration

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, For those whom it may concern: Since the Numpy Trac - Github migration is complete, I went ahead and added redirects projects.scipy.org/numpy/register - github.com/numpy/numpy/issues projects.scipy.org/numpy/newticket -

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Weird Travis-CI bugs in the release 1.7.x branch

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On 4 Dec 2012 02:27, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I started to work on the release again and noticed weird failures at Travis-CI: […] File /home/travis/virtualenv/python2.5/lib/python2.5/site

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Weird Travis-CI bugs in the release 1.7.x branch

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On 4 Dec 2012 02:27, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I started to work on the release again and noticed weird failures

[Numpy-discussion] Weird Travis-CI bugs in the release 1.7.x branch

Hi, I started to work on the release again and noticed weird failures at Travis-CI: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2782 The first commit (8a18fc7) should not trigger this failure: == FAIL:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7.0 release

Hi all, Having looked at the README.txt and INSTALL.txt files on the branch, I see no mention of which Python 3.x versions are supported: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/maintenance/1.7.x/README.txt https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/maintenance/1.7.x/INSTALL.txt Is NumPy 1.7

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should abs([nan]) be supported?

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: The framework for catching errors relies on hardware flags getting set and our C code making the right calls to detect those flags. This has

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7.0 release

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Gael Varoquaux gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:27:02PM -0800, Ondřej Čertík wrote: I successfully defended my Ph.D. thesis last Thursday, I just need to do some changes to it and submit it and I am done. Yey! Tag and release

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7.0 release

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Here is a list of issues that need to be fixed before the release: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?milestone=3state=open If anyone wants to help, we just need to get through them and submit a PR

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7.0 release

Hi, On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Hey all, Ondrej has been tied up finishing his PhD for the past several weeks. He is defending his work shortly and should be available to continue to help with the 1.7.0 release around the first of December.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7.0 release

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Hey all, Ondrej has been tied up finishing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making numpy sensible: backward compatibility please

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Gael Varoquaux gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:37:35PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: +1, I think we should endeavor to have a respectful and welcoming community. With a bit of humour now and then among the old timers,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0b2 release

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote: Hi, I tested this new beta on Theano and discovered an

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Package: scipy-0.11.0-0.1.rc2.fc18 Tag: f18-updates-candidate Status: failed Built by: orion

Hi Orion, On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: This is a plea for some help. We've been having trouble getting scipy to pass all of the tests in the Fedora 18 build with python 3.3 (although it seems to build okay in Fedora 19). Below are the logs of

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0b2 release

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second beta release of NumPy 1.7.0b2. Sources and binary installers can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0b2/ Please test this release and report any issues on the numpy-discussion mailing list. Since beta1,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0b2 release

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Richard Hattersley rhatters...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, [First of all - thanks to everyone involved in the 1.7 release. Especially Ondřej - it takes a lot of time energy to coordinate something like this.] Is there an up to date release schedule anywhere? The

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0b2 release

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Richard Hattersley rhatters...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, [First of all - thanks to everyone involved in the 1.7

[Numpy-discussion] Status of fixing bugs for the 1.7.0rc1 release

Hi, I've finally finished review of https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/439 which back-ports all the PRs from master into the release branch and pushed it in. Here is the current status of bugs for the 1.7.0 release: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/396 I believe that for example a lot

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Contiguity of result of astype changed - intentional?

Hi Matt, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Is this intended? Is there a performance reason to keep the same strides in 1.7.0? I believe that this could be because in 1.7.0, NumPy was changed so that copying does not always default to C-order but

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.7b1 API change cause big trouble

Hi Fred, On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote: Hi, I spent up to now 2 or 3 days making change to Theano to support numpy 1.7b1. But now, I just find an interface change that will need

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Mysterious test_pareto failure on Travis

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: The last two Travis builds of master have failed consistently with the same error: http://travis-ci.org/#!/numpy/numpy/builds It looks like a real failure -- we're getting the same error on every build variant, some sort

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Mysterious test_pareto failure on Travis

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: The last two Travis builds of master have failed consistently with the same error: http://travis-ci.org/#!/numpy/numpy/builds It looks like

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Mysterious test_pareto failure on Travis

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: The last two Travis builds of master have failed consistently

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Mysterious test_pareto failure on Travis

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Mysterious test_pareto failure on Travis

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:58 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0b1 release

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: If you could create issues at github: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues

[Numpy-discussion] Should abs([nan]) be supported?

Hi, When running the test suite, there are problems of this kind: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/394 which then causes for example the Debian buildbots tests to fail (https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/406). The problem is really simple: from numpy import array, abs, nan a =

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should abs([nan]) be supported?

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: There is an error context that controls how floating point signals are handled. There is a separate control for underflow, overflow, divide by zero, and invalid. IIRC, it was decided on this list a while ago to

[Numpy-discussion] How to debug reference counting errors

Hi, There is segfault reported here: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1588 I've managed to isolate the problem and even provide a simple patch, that fixes it here: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/398 however the patch simply doesn't decrease the proper reference, so it might leak.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] view of recarray issue

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Jay Bourque jay.bour...@continuum.io wrote: Ondrej, Sorry for the delay in getting back to this. I have some free time today to get this resolved if you haven't already fixed it. I haven't. If you can look at it, that would be absolutely awesome. If you don't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issues for 1.7.0

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am keeping track of all issues that need to be done for the 1.7.0 release here: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Temporary error accessing NumPy tickets

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Ondřej Čertík ondrej.certik at gmail.com writes: When I access tickets, for example: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2185 then sometimes I get: Trac detected an internal error: OperationalError: database is locked

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0b1 release

Hi Sandro, On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Hello, On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first beta release of NumPy 1.7.0b1. I've just uploaded it to Debian

  1   2   >