Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bug with mafromtxt

2009-01-26 Thread Pierre GM
On Jan 24, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Ryan May wrote: Ok, thanks. I've dug a little further, and it seems like the problem is that a column of all missing values ends up as a column of all None's. When you create a (masked) array from a list of None's, you end up with an object array. On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bug with mafromtxt

2009-01-26 Thread Ryan May
Pierre GM wrote: On Jan 24, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Ryan May wrote: Ok, thanks. I've dug a little further, and it seems like the problem is that a column of all missing values ends up as a column of all None's. When you create a (masked) array from a list of None's, you end up with an object

[Numpy-discussion] Bug with mafromtxt

2009-01-24 Thread Ryan May
Pierre, I've found what I consider to be a bug in the new mafromtxt (though apparently it existed in earlier versions as well). If you have an entire column of data in a file that contains only masked data, and try to get mafromtxt to automatically choose the dtype, the dtype gets selected to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bug with mafromtxt

2009-01-24 Thread Pierre GM
Ryan, Thanks for reporting. An idea would be to force the dtype of the masked column to the largest dtype of the other columns (in your example, that would be int). I'll try to see how easily it can be done early next week. Meanwhile, you can always give an explicit dtype at creation. On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bug with mafromtxt

2009-01-24 Thread Ryan May
Pierre GM wrote: Ryan, Thanks for reporting. An idea would be to force the dtype of the masked column to the largest dtype of the other columns (in your example, that would be int). I'll try to see how easily it can be done early next week. Meanwhile, you can always give an explicit