Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.5 almost ready

2008-03-21 Thread Matthieu Brucher
I confirm that the reference count is consistent when trying the exemple
given in the first post of the ticket (Ubuntu 7.10, gcc 4.1.3, Python 2.5.1
).

Matthieu

2008/3/21, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   to, 2008-03-20 kello 21:09 +0100, Matthieu Brucher kirjoitti:
   Well, it is not completely solved. With the patch, the reference count
keeps on raising, but as it is for Python scalars, it is not a
problem, but the underlying problem in Py_DECREF will show up
eventually and it will need to be solved. But I'm afraid I'm not
intimate enough with the mecanisms of Numpys arrays to solve it.
 
   I wrote a second patch that I think fixes the problem, and it seems to
   work at least for the testcases I tried.


 Excellent!

 Thanks so much,


 --
 Jarrod Millman
 Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs
 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley
 phone: 510.643.4014
 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/
 ___

 Numpy-discussion mailing list
 Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
 http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion




-- 
French PhD student
Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.5 almost ready

2008-03-21 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
Thank you, Pauli.  Tested and applied in r4899.

Regards
Stéfan

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  to, 2008-03-20 kello 21:09 +0100, Matthieu Brucher kirjoitti:

  Well, it is not completely solved. With the patch, the reference count
   keeps on raising, but as it is for Python scalars, it is not a
   problem, but the underlying problem in Py_DECREF will show up
   eventually and it will need to be solved. But I'm afraid I'm not
   intimate enough with the mecanisms of Numpys arrays to solve it.

  I wrote a second patch that I think fixes the problem, and it seems to
  work at least for the testcases I tried.

  --
  Pauli Virtanen
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.5 almost ready

2008-03-20 Thread Pauli Virtanen

ke, 2008-03-19 kello 11:53 -0700, Jarrod Millman kirjoitti:
 Hello,
 
 Thanks to everyone who has been working on getting the 1.0.5 release
 of NumPy out the door.  Since my last email at least 12 bug tickets
 have been closed.  There are a few remaining issues with the trunk,
 but we are fasting approaching a release.

Ticket #633 is likely mostly solved now. There's a patch fixing bugs in
object array refcounting at http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/633

-- 
Pauli Virtanen



signature.asc
Description: Digitaalisesti allekirjoitettu viestin osa
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.5 almost ready

2008-03-20 Thread Matthieu Brucher
Well, it is not completely solved. With the patch, the reference count keeps
on raising, but as it is for Python scalars, it is not a problem, but the
underlying problem in Py_DECREF will show up eventually and it will need to
be solved. But I'm afraid I'm not intimate enough with the mecanisms of
Numpys arrays to solve it.

Matthieu

2008/3/20, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 ke, 2008-03-19 kello 11:53 -0700, Jarrod Millman kirjoitti:

  Hello,
 
  Thanks to everyone who has been working on getting the 1.0.5 release
  of NumPy out the door.  Since my last email at least 12 bug tickets
  have been closed.  There are a few remaining issues with the trunk,
  but we are fasting approaching a release.


 Ticket #633 is likely mostly solved now. There's a patch fixing bugs in
 object array refcounting at http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/633

 --

 Pauli Virtanen


 ___
 Numpy-discussion mailing list
 Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
 http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion





-- 
French PhD student
Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.5 almost ready

2008-03-20 Thread Pauli Virtanen

to, 2008-03-20 kello 21:09 +0100, Matthieu Brucher kirjoitti:
 Well, it is not completely solved. With the patch, the reference count
 keeps on raising, but as it is for Python scalars, it is not a
 problem, but the underlying problem in Py_DECREF will show up
 eventually and it will need to be solved. But I'm afraid I'm not
 intimate enough with the mecanisms of Numpys arrays to solve it.

I wrote a second patch that I think fixes the problem, and it seems to
work at least for the testcases I tried.

-- 
Pauli Virtanen



signature.asc
Description: Digitaalisesti allekirjoitettu viestin osa
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.5 almost ready

2008-03-19 Thread Jarrod Millman
Hello,

Thanks to everyone who has been working on getting the 1.0.5 release
of NumPy out the door.  Since my last email at least 12 bug tickets
have been closed.  There are a few remaining issues with the trunk,
but we are fasting approaching a release.

One additional issue that I would like to see more progress made on
before tagging the next release is improved documentation especially
of the new maskedarray implementation.  I know that Pierre has spent a
lot of time developing the new implementation and has other pressing
issues, so ideally others will be able to pitch in.  Given that I want
to get the release out ASAP, I have decided to have a Doc Day this
Friday, March 21st.  I will send out an official announcement later
tonight.

This release promises to bring a number of important improvements and
should represent a very stable and mature release in the 1.0 series of
NumPy.  After this release I hope to start planning for the a new
major development series leading to a 1.1 release.  So if you have any
time to help close tickets or improve documentation, please take the
time over the next few days to do so.

Thanks,

-- 
Jarrod Millman
Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs
10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley
phone: 510.643.4014
http://cirl.berkeley.edu/
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion