On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On
I'm not sure what the conclusion actually was from this long thread.
But, in trying to update the 1.7.x branch, I ended up in a very odd state with
respect to the github pages. I used git filter-branch to try and get rid of
empty commits that were showing up for some reason. However, this
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
I'm not sure what the conclusion actually was from this long thread.
But, in trying to update the 1.7.x branch, I ended up in a very odd state
with respect to the github pages. I used git filter-branch to try and get
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
I'm not sure what the conclusion actually was from this long thread.
But, in trying to update the 1.7.x branch, I ended up in a
On Jul 19, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I'm not sure what the conclusion actually was from this long thread.
But, in trying to update the 1.7.x branch, I ended up in a very odd state
with respect
Hi,
* Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com [2012-07-19]:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
I'm not sure what the conclusion actually was from this long thread.
But,
Thanks for the review. I think it will be safe as well. Ondrej is traveling
to Prague at the moment. When he arrives, let's here what he has to say and
then move forward.
-Travis
On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray)
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Travis and I agree that it would
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM,
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
Hi All,
Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current
1.7.x
branch and branch again after a code freeze. That
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root
ben.r...@ou.edujavascript:;
wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com javascript:;
Hi,
* Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com [2012-07-12]:
Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current 1.7.x
branch and branch again after a code freeze. That way we can avoid the pain
and potential errors of backports. It is considered bad form to mess with
Hi All,
Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current 1.7.x
branch and branch again after a code freeze. That way we can avoid the pain
and potential errors of backports. It is considered bad form to mess with
public repositories that way, so another option would be to
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current 1.7.x
branch and branch again after a code freeze. That way we can avoid the pain
and potential errors of backports. It is
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current
1.7.x
branch and branch again after a code
17 matches
Mail list logo
