Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
An IronPython compatible version of NumPy would be great.Of course
it could be done by using C# to write NumPy, but I'm not sure that this
would really be any less work than creating a glue layer that allowed
most (or all) C-Python extensions to work with
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Giles Thomas wrote:
Hi,
At Resolver Systems, we have a product that is written in IronPython -
the .NET Python implementation - and allows users to use that language
to script a spreadsheet-like interface. Because they're using
IronPython, they can access
An IronPython compatible version of NumPy would be great.Of course
it could be done by using C# to write NumPy, but I'm not sure that this
would really be any less work than creating a glue layer that allowed
most (or all) C-Python extensions to work with IronPython.
I'm curious
What are people's opinions about the value of NumPy and SciPy on the
CLR?
As someone who uses Numpy/Scipy almost exclusively on Linux workstations
or on clusters (in coordination with lots of C code), I wouldn't value
NumPy and SciPy on the CLR at all.
I am kind of curious, though, to see
On 10/26/07, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An IronPython compatible version of NumPy would be great.Of course
it could be done by using C# to write NumPy, but I'm not sure that this
would really be any less work than creating a glue layer that allowed
most (or all)
What are people's opinions about the value of NumPy and SciPy on
the CLR?
If anything, wouldn't the big win (if it's a win at all) be to get
NumPy/SciPy working on top of the JVM (as T. Hochber tried)? This way
it's pretty much universally portable.
I know Jython isn't as up to speed as
We've created a Google Group to discuss this project, and if anyone's
interested in contributing or advising, you're very welcome to sign up:
http://groups.google.com/group/c-extensions-for-ironpython/
My replies to everyone's comments below:
David Cournapeau wrote:
Giles, maybe you could
Hello
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Giles Thomas wrote:
* Would it be better to try for some kind of binary compatibility,
where we'd write some kind of glue that sat between the existing
C extension .pyd files and the IronPython engine? Our gut feeling
is that this would be much
Giles Thomas wrote:
Hi,
At Resolver Systems, we have a product that is written in IronPython -
the .NET Python implementation - and allows users to use that language
to script a spreadsheet-like interface. Because they're using
IronPython, they can access their existing .NET objects and
Is there a C# - C (or, I guess, really a .net - C ) binding
mechanism? Like JNI for Java?
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/ORR(206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206)
Christopher Barker wrote:
Is there a C# - C (or, I guess, really a .net - C ) binding
mechanism? Like JNI for Java?
I don't know much about the whole .Net thing (CLR, in this case), but
there is the p-invoke mechanism for that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_Invocation_Services
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
