On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Nils Becker n.bec...@amolf.nl wrote:
Hi,
what about the normed=True bug in numpy.histogram? It was discussed here
a while ago, and fixed (although i did not find it on the tracker), but
the message
aanlktikwbsrxq0ynf3u3jo3ekrikszmwqy30pnsfg...@mail.gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
On 10/ 6/10 12:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Hi,
Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
Any Python versions:
- #1605
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just asking,
Should I backport some bugs that were corrected in 2.0 for numpy.ma ? I
don't have any particular in mind, but I'm sure there
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Pierre GM
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:48:14 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
[clip]
Ok I remember, Pareto is actually Lomax or Pareto second kind, and
should be renamed. The proposal was to rename the current pareto to
pareto2 and create a new pareto
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:48:14 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
[clip]
Ok I remember, Pareto is actually Lomax or Pareto second kind, and
should be renamed. The proposal was
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:28:01 -0400, josef.pktd wrote:
[clip]
I think I clarified the doc string enough that user that read the
docstring don't get confused anymore.
http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.random.mtrand.RandomState.pareto/
At least the first part is explicit about it, the notes
On 10/ 8/10 03:43 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
On 10/ 6/10 12:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Hi,
Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
Any Python
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:34:46 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
[clip]
A 1.5.1 release soon would be good. All the issues above are already
committed, is there anything else that needs to go in? If not, I think
an RC by the end of next week (10/17) and release by the end of the
month should be possible.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release?
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:09:37 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
[clip]
No, I just wanted to include the Laguerre and Hermite polynomials and
add a domain keyword to the linspace method of the polynomial template.
But I don't think these are pressing needs.
It's a minor release, so I think we need to
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli
On 10/07/2010 08:45 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com mailto:ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Charles R
Just asking,
Should I backport some bugs that were corrected in 2.0 for numpy.ma ? I don't
have any particular in mind, but I'm sure there must be some...
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just asking,
Should I backport some bugs that were corrected in 2.0 for numpy.ma ? I
don't have any particular in mind, but I'm sure there must be some...
That would be helpful. Please backport any bug fixes that you
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that this is a good idea to have this minor release with as few
changes as possible. This allows us to clearly state everything has moved to
git and localize any problems that users should not have related to the
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:06:55 + (UTC)
Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:34:46 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
[clip]
A 1.5.1 release soon would be good. All the issues above
are already
committed, is there anything else that needs to go in?
If not, I think
an RC by the
Hi,
what about the normed=True bug in numpy.histogram? It was discussed here
a while ago, and fixed (although i did not find it on the tracker), but
the message
aanlktikwbsrxq0ynf3u3jo3ekrikszmwqy30pnsfg...@mail.gmail.com
suggests it just missed 1.5.0? I don't have 1.5 installed, so I can't
On 10/ 6/10 12:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Hi,
Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
Any Python versions:
- #1605 (Cython vs. PEP-3118 issue: raising exceptions with active
cython buffers caused
Hi,
Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
Any Python versions:
- #1605 (Cython vs. PEP-3118 issue: raising exceptions with active
cython buffers caused undefined behavior. Breaks Sage.)
- #1617 (Ensure
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
Any Python versions:
- #1605 (Cython vs. PEP-3118 issue: raising exceptions with active
25 matches
Mail list logo
