On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:44 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
I just added a warning alerting concerned users (r8674), so this takes care
of the bug fix and Nils wish to avoid a silent change in behavior. These two
changes could be included in 1.5 if Ralf feels this is worthwhile.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:44 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.comwrote:
I just added a warning alerting concerned users (r8674), so this takes
care of the bug fix and Nils wish to avoid a silent change in
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:13 PM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:44 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.comwrote:
I just added a warning alerting concerned users (r8674),
Thanks for the feedback,
As far as I understand it, the proposition is to keep histogram as it is for
1.5, then in 2.0, deprecate normed=True but keep the buggy behavior, while
adding a density keyword that fixes the bug. In a later release, we could
then get rid of normed. While the bug won't be
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback,
As far as I understand it, the proposition is to keep histogram as it is
for 1.5, then in 2.0, deprecate normed=True but keep the buggy behavior,
while adding a density keyword that fixes the
On 08/30/2010 09:19 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com
mailto:david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback,
As far as I understand it, the proposition is to keep histogram as
it is for 1.5, then in 2.0, deprecate
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/30/2010 09:19 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback,
As far as I understand it, the proposition is to keep histogram as it is
I tend to agree with Josef here,
To me, bincount and digitize are the low-level functions, and histogram
contains a bit more functionality since its used so often and for many use
cases. My guess is that if we removed the normalization, it could annoy a
lot of people and would quickly appear on
I think (a corrected) density histogram is core functionality for
unequal bin lengths.
The graph with raw count in the case of unequal bin sizes would be
quite misleading when plotted and interpreted on the real line and not
on discrete points (shaded areas instead of vertical lines). And
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/30/2010 09:19 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the feedback,
As
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/30/2010 09:19 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 AM,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/30/2010
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:44 PM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:12, Zbyszek Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:43:26PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
? ?On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
? ?wrote:
? ? ?On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:32, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:32 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Nils and Joseph,
Thanks for the bug report, this is now fixed in SVN (r8672).
Ralph. is this something that you want to see backported in 1.5 ?
From the other replies to your mail I gather your bug fix is still going
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:32 AM, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Nils and Joseph,
Thanks for the bug report, this is now fixed in SVN (r8672).
Ralph. is this something that you want to see backported
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Nils Becker n.bec...@amolf.nl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:12, Zbyszek Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:43:26PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
? ?On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
? ?wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:43:26PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:32, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nils and Joseph,
Thanks for the bug report,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:12, Zbyszek Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:43:26PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:32, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com
Nils and Joseph,
Thanks for the bug report, this is now fixed in SVN (r8672).
Ralph. is this something that you want to see backported in 1.5 ?
Regards,
David
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:49 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Nils Becker n.bec...@amolf.nl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:32, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Nils and Joseph,
Thanks for the bug report, this is now fixed in SVN (r8672).
While we're at it, can we change the name of the argument? normed
has caused so much confusion over the years. We could deprecate
normed=True in
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:32, David Huard david.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Nils and Joseph,
Thanks for the bug report, this is now fixed in SVN (r8672).
While we're at it, can we change the name of the argument? normed
Hi,
I found what looks like a bug in histogram, when the option normed=True
is used together with non-uniform bins.
Consider this example:
import numpy as np
data = np.array([1, 2, 3, 4])
bins = np.array([.5, 1.5, 4.5])
bin_widths = np.diff(bins)
(counts, dummy) = np.histogram(data, bins)
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Nils Becker n.bec...@amolf.nl wrote:
Hi,
I found what looks like a bug in histogram, when the option normed=True
is used together with non-uniform bins.
Consider this example:
import numpy as np
data = np.array([1, 2, 3, 4])
bins = np.array([.5, 1.5,
Hi again,
first a correction: I posted
I believe np.histogram(data, bins, normed=True) effectively does :
np.histogram(data, bins, normed=False) / (bins[-1] - bins[0]).
However, it _should_ do
np.histogram(data, bins, normed=False) / bins_widths
but there is a normalization missing; it
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Nils Becker n.bec...@amolf.nl wrote:
Hi again,
first a correction: I posted
I believe np.histogram(data, bins, normed=True) effectively does :
np.histogram(data, bins, normed=False) / (bins[-1] - bins[0]).
However, it _should_ do
np.histogram(data, bins,
26 matches
Mail list logo
