On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> I'd be tempted to replace that unreadable link with
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/scipy/ and not care about
> pip/easy_install scanning that page. Binary installers don't work anyway and
> source bundles are on pypi already, s
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:34 PM, wrote:
> My first stop is always pypi to find the link to binaries.
>
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scipy
> however the direct download link points to 0.11
>
Grrr. IIRC that's because you have to link a page on SF which has the
actual binaries, and that link ha
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 23.10.2013 23:24, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti:
> > 23.10.2013 22:50, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
> > [clip]
> >> This makes me think: apparently there is an offical "scipy stack" --
> >> and I even found it with a quick google:
> >>
> >> http://w
My first stop is always pypi to find the link to binaries.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scipy
however the direct download link points to 0.11
Josef
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy
Folks,
After some more discussion here and on the pull request I submitted
earlier, here is anew pull request -- I think conforms to what folks
suggested, but still makes it a lot easier for folks to find the
stand-alone installers if that's what they are looking for.
https://github.com/scipy/sci
23.10.2013 23:24, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti:
> 23.10.2013 22:50, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> This makes me think: apparently there is an offical "scipy stack" --
>> and I even found it with a quick google:
>>
>> http://www.scipy.org/stackspec.html
>
> If you click "More information..." on t
23.10.2013 22:50, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
[clip]
> This makes me think: apparently there is an offical "scipy stack" --
> and I even found it with a quick google:
>
> http://www.scipy.org/stackspec.html
If you click "More information..." on the front page, or "About Scipy"
in the sidebar, it take
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> I am arguing that whether it's a good idea or not, according to us, is
> not going affect the guys and gals in Group 2, and that, unless we
> want to lose or discourage those people, we'll always need to support
> (and give mind- and page-s
23.10.2013 21:06, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti:
> 23.10.2013 17:51, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> But it sounds like the real problem is with the surrounding
>> pages--that's the page you find when you try to figure out how to get
>> numpy--if that page is about the stack, it shoul
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 23.10.2013 20:10, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> There's no need to prefer one group over the other - we just need to
>> make sure that both groups have instructions and binaries they can
>> recognize as being for their case. As
23.10.2013 17:51, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal kirjoitti:
[clip]
> But it sounds like the real problem is with the surrounding
> pages--that's the page you find when you try to figure out how to get
> numpy--if that page is about the stack, it should not be linked to
> directly from the numpy.org pa
23.10.2013 20:10, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
[clip]
> There's no need to prefer one group over the other - we just need to
> make sure that both groups have instructions and binaries they can
> recognize as being for their case. As in:
>
> (Group 1): The easiest way to get
> (Group 2): You can
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:16 AM, jim vickroy wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 8:51 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
>
> Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> but the layout of that page is on
> purpose. scipy.org is split into two parts: (a) a SciPy Stack part, and
> (b)
> a numpy & scipy library part. You'r
On 10/23/2013 8:51 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
Ralf Gommers wrote:
but the layout of that page is on
purpose. scipy.org is split into two parts: (a) a SciPy Stack part, and
(b)
a numpy & scipy library part. You're looking at the stack part, and the
preferred method to install that
Ralf Gommers wrote:
but the layout of that page is on
purpose. scipy.org is split into two parts: (a) a SciPy Stack part, and
(b)
a numpy & scipy library part. You're looking at the stack part, and the
preferred method to install that stack is a Python distribution.
OK,
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>> > You can argue with the exact wording,
>>
>> I won't argue, I'll suggest an alternative in a pull request...
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy.org
>
> Agreed that numpy.org is not in great shape. Volunteers welcome I'd say.
I just did a pull request to update the "Getting Numpy" link -- but
yes, it needs more than that...someday.
-Chris
--
Christop
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > You can argue with the exact wording,
>
> I won't argue, I'll suggest an alternative in a pull request...
>
> > but the layout of that page is on
> > purpose. scipy.org is split into
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
> > (off to do a pull request)
>
> Done.
>
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/pull/30
>
Thanks Chris!
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
Num
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> By the way:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
>
> > If you google "numpy" you get the numpy.org page as the first hit
> >
> > If you go to numpy.org, there is a "geting numpy" link, that takes you
> to:
> >
> > http:
By the way:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> If you google "numpy" you get the numpy.org page as the first hit
>
> If you go to numpy.org, there is a "geting numpy" link, that takes you to:
>
> http://www.scipy.org/install.html
The www.numpy.org page could perhaps use some
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> (off to do a pull request)
Done.
https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/pull/30
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R(206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> You can argue with the exact wording,
I won't argue, I'll suggest an alternative in a pull request...
> but the layout of that page is on
> purpose. scipy.org is split into two parts: (a) a SciPy Stack part, and (b)
> a numpy & scipy library
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > 22.10.2013 06:29, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
> >> If you go to numpy.org, and try to figure out how to install numpy,
> >> you are most likely to end up here:
> >>
> >> http://www.scipy
On 10/22/2013 09:28 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> 22.10.2013 06:29, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
>>> If you go to numpy.org, and try to figure out how to install numpy,
>>> you are most likely to end up here:
>>>
>>> http://www.scipy.org/install.htm
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 22.10.2013 06:29, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
>> If you go to numpy.org, and try to figure out how to install numpy,
>> you are most likely to end up here:
>>
>> http://www.scipy.org/install.html
>>
>> where there is no mention of the binaries b
22.10.2013 06:29, Chris Barker kirjoitti:
> If you go to numpy.org, and try to figure out how to install numpy,
> you are most likely to end up here:
>
> http://www.scipy.org/install.html
>
> where there is no mention of the binaries built by the numpy project
> itself, either Windows or Mac.
Th
If you go to numpy.org, and try to figure out how to install numpy,
you are most likely to end up here:
http://www.scipy.org/install.html
where there is no mention of the binaries built by the numpy project
itself, either Windows or Mac.
There probably should be.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barke
28 matches
Mail list logo