On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:12, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is now!
Excellent work!
I've had no problem with using the
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 00:50, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is now! Add
import line_profiler
ip.expose_magic('lprun', line_profiler.magic_lprun)
to your ipy_user_conf.py .
Mmh, should we
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:12, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I could use some comments on the workflow. Does this look sensible
to everyone? How else would you like to use it?
Works for me. I would love to
Hey,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is now! Add
import line_profiler
ip.expose_magic('lprun', line_profiler.magic_lprun)
to your ipy_user_conf.py .
Mmh, should we ship this out of the box in ipython? The C dependency
is the only thing
Robert Kern wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 07:00, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Ah, found it. T_LONGLONG is a #define from structmember.h which is
used to describe the types of attributes. Apparently, this was not
added until Python 2.5. That particular member
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:09, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 07:00, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Ah, found it. T_LONGLONG is a #define from structmember.h which is
used to describe the types of attributes.
Robert Kern wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:09, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 07:00, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Ah, found it. T_LONGLONG is a #define from structmember.h which is
used to describe the types
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:26, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool, then I have another one:
$ ./kernprof.py -l pystone.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./kernprof.py, line 173, in ?
sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
File ./kernprof.py, line 138, in main
import
Robert Kern wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:26, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool, then I have another one:
$ ./kernprof.py -l pystone.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./kernprof.py, line 173, in ?
sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
File ./kernprof.py, line 138, in
Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:01, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
years!
I can't imagine
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It requires Cython and a C compiler to build. I'm still debating
myself about the desired workflow for using
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:33, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have Python 2.4.4
in pyconfig.h
#define HAVE_LONG_LONG 1
in pyport.h:
#ifdef HAVE_LONG_LONG
#ifndef PY_LONG_LONG
#define PY_LONG_LONG long long
#endif
#endif /* HAVE_LONG_LONG */
so it seems compatible with
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It requires Cython and a C compiler
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 18:29, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 18:09, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I am getting:
$ ./kernprof.py -l pystone.py
Wrote profile results to pystone.py.lprof
$ ./view_line_prof.py pystone.py.lprof
Timer unit:
Robert Kern wrote:
Ah, found it. T_LONGLONG is a #define from structmember.h which is
used to describe the types of attributes. Apparently, this was not
added until Python 2.5. That particular member didn't actually need to
be long long, so I've fixed that.
Great, I will try it after it
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 07:00, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Ah, found it. T_LONGLONG is a #define from structmember.h which is
used to describe the types of attributes. Apparently, this was not
added until Python 2.5. That particular member didn't actually need to
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 18:09, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
years!
I can't imagine I'm the only one
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It requires Cython and a C compiler to build. I'm still debating
myself about the desired workflow for using it, but for now, it only
profiles functions which you have registered with it. I have made
So the timing raises a lot. For obvious reasons, that's the overhead
of the profiler. But the problem is that then the timings just don't
fit, e.g. if I sum the total time spent in subfunctions, it doesn't
account for all the time printed on the respective line in the parent
function.
I
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:12, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It should be straightforward to make an ipython %magic, yes. There are
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:01, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
years!
I can't imagine I'm the only one who
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:03, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, back to work: Robert K., I noticed that if I profile some
function, I get results like this for example:
40 307246952 6.6 [x,w] = p_roots(n)
41 307224192 3.4
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:54:13PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
So here's what going on: I'm being clever (and possibly too clever).
Oh no. Robert K. is too clever. We knew that, right ;).
Gaël
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I could use some comments on the workflow. Does this look sensible
to everyone? How else would you like to use it?
Works for me. I would love to use it as a part of an ipython session.
Initially, I sprinkled som
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:12, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I could use some comments on the workflow. Does this look sensible
to everyone? How else would you like to use it?
Works for me. I would love to
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
years!
I can't imagine I'm the only one who profiles some hundred lines of
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 18:09, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
years!
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
years!
I can't imagine I'm the only one who profiles some hundred lines of code and
ends up with 90% of total time in the dot-function
For the time
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:27, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using the prun feature of Ipython which is very helpful.
I was wondering though if theres anything for Python that would allow
line-by-line profiling (ie a time for each line of code) like the
MATLAB profiler?
I don't
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have some Cython code that
does this. It needs a little bit more work, though. I'll try to push
it out soonish.
That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
years!
I can't imagine I'm the
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Arnar Flatberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have some Cython code that
does this. It needs a little bit more work, though. I'll try to push
it out soonish.
That would make me an extremely
The hotshot profiler used to do this, but I don't think it is really
supported anymore... I have not used it in a while, but agree that a
line-by-line profiler can be very nice.
Michael.
On Sep 15, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Robin wrote:
Hi,
I am using the prun feature of Ipython which is very
Michael McNeil Forbes wrote:
The hotshot profiler used to do this, but I don't think it is really
supported anymore... I have not used it in a while, but agree that a
line-by-line profiler can be very nice.
You can do it with kcachegrind, which is arguably more powerful, but it
is a bit
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 21:43, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael McNeil Forbes wrote:
The hotshot profiler used to do this, but I don't think it is really
supported anymore... I have not used it in a while, but agree that a
line-by-line profiler can be very nice.
You can do
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 21:43, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can do it with kcachegrind, which is arguably more powerful, but it
is a bit a pain to set up.
http://jcalderone.livejournal.com/21124.html
No, that's with cProfile, which doesn't
->
[Numpy-discussion] profiling line by line
numpy-discussion
-- Thread --
-- Date --
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734";
google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.mail-
37 matches
Mail list logo
