t; On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jarrod Millman <mill...@berkeley.edu>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Assuming that sounds good, my tentative next steps are:
>> >&g
Hi Chuck,
A few more bits of advice from a local ...
Oakland airport is smaller and closer, so I try to use it when I can.
But SFO probably has more options and isn't too far away.
I prefer Hotel Shattuck Plaza to Hotel Durant. Shattuck is close to
BART. So you can get on the BART at either
, so the farthest you probably need to travel is from
the hotel to BIDS and back.
Best regards,
Jarrod
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Jarrod Millman <mill...@berkeley.edu>
&g
+1
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I think NumPy 1.16 would be a good time to drop Python 3.4 support. We will
> want to do that anyway once we drop 2.7 so that we will only be using recent
> Windows compilers, and with Python 3.7 due at the end of the
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> For Scipy, we converted the examples in the documentation to Python 3,
>> and have essentially ignored Python 2 compatibility. So far, I remember
>> no complaints about it.
+1
Jarrod
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a
>>> bigger surface
I am happy to announce the third **release candidate** for NetworkX
2.3! NetworkX is a Python package for the creation, manipulation, and
study of the structure, dynamics, and functions of complex networks.
This release supports Python 3.5-3.7 (i.e., this is our first **Python
3 only** release).
Sounds good!
Jarrod
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:53 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:20 PM Jarrod Millman wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> I just finished doing that for NetworkX and would be happy to start a
>> PR for NumPy
Hi Chuck,
I just finished doing that for NetworkX and would be happy to start a
PR for NumPy tomorrow (assuming there are no objections).
Best regards,
Jarrod
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:53 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Just want to propose cleaning up the Python 2.7 compatibility
t; > > > > Although
> > > > > PyPy is maybe not a big priority.
> > > > >
> > > > > We don't have to support 3.6 and I don't care if we do. Until
> > > > > this
> > > > > discussion my assumption was we would probably
for old version of Python and NumPy too
soon.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 6:44 PM Jarrod Millman wrote:
>
> NetworkX is currently planning to support 3.6 for our coming 2.6
> release (dec 2020) and 3.0 release (early 2021). We had originally
> thought about following NEP 29. But I assumed
NetworkX is currently planning to support 3.6 for our coming 2.6
release (dec 2020) and 3.0 release (early 2021). We had originally
thought about following NEP 29. But I assumed it had been abandoned,
since neither NumPy nor SciPy dropped Python 3.6 on Jun 23, 2020.
NetworkX is likely to
12 matches
Mail list logo
